Dynamics and significance of the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Journal
medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences
Titre abrégé: medRxiv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101767986
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Jul 2020
20 Jul 2020
Historique:
entrez:
4
8
2020
pubmed:
4
8
2020
medline:
4
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Characterizing the humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and developing accurate serologic assays are needed for diagnostic purposes and estimating population-level seroprevalence. We measured the kinetics of early antibody responses to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 in a cohort of 259 symptomatic North American patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 (up to 75 days after symptom onset) compared to antibody levels in 1548 individuals whose blood samples were obtained prior to the pandemic. Between 14-28 days from onset of symptoms, IgG, IgA, or IgM antibody responses to RBD were all accurate in identifying recently infected individuals, with 100% specificity and a sensitivity of 97%, 91%, and 81% respectively. Although the estimated median time to becoming seropositive was similar across isotypes, IgA and IgM antibodies against RBD were short-lived with most individuals estimated to become seronegative again by 51 and 47 days after symptom onset, respectively. IgG antibodies against RBD lasted longer and persisted through 75 days post-symptoms. IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 RBD were highly correlated with neutralizing antibodies targeting the S protein. No cross-reactivity of the SARS-CoV-2 RBD-targeted antibodies was observed with several known circulating coronaviruses, HKU1, OC 229 E, OC43, and NL63. Among symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 cases, RBD-targeted antibodies can be indicative of previous and recent infection. IgG antibodies are correlated with neutralizing antibodies and are possibly a correlate of protective immunity.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Characterizing the humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and developing accurate serologic assays are needed for diagnostic purposes and estimating population-level seroprevalence.
METHODS
METHODS
We measured the kinetics of early antibody responses to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 in a cohort of 259 symptomatic North American patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 (up to 75 days after symptom onset) compared to antibody levels in 1548 individuals whose blood samples were obtained prior to the pandemic.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Between 14-28 days from onset of symptoms, IgG, IgA, or IgM antibody responses to RBD were all accurate in identifying recently infected individuals, with 100% specificity and a sensitivity of 97%, 91%, and 81% respectively. Although the estimated median time to becoming seropositive was similar across isotypes, IgA and IgM antibodies against RBD were short-lived with most individuals estimated to become seronegative again by 51 and 47 days after symptom onset, respectively. IgG antibodies against RBD lasted longer and persisted through 75 days post-symptoms. IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 RBD were highly correlated with neutralizing antibodies targeting the S protein. No cross-reactivity of the SARS-CoV-2 RBD-targeted antibodies was observed with several known circulating coronaviruses, HKU1, OC 229 E, OC43, and NL63.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Among symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 cases, RBD-targeted antibodies can be indicative of previous and recent infection. IgG antibodies are correlated with neutralizing antibodies and are possibly a correlate of protective immunity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32743600
doi: 10.1101/2020.07.18.20155374
pmc: PMC7386524
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Preprint
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI146779
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : T32 AI007245
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM008313
Pays : United States
Références
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1194-1196
pubmed: 32074416
Public Health. 2020 May;182:170-172
pubmed: 32334183
Nat Commun. 2020 May 14;11(1):2511
pubmed: 32409714
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):778-785
pubmed: 32198501
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Oct;89(2):106-111
pubmed: 28821364
J Med Virol. 2021 Apr;93(4):2160-2167
pubmed: 33064340
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Aug 18;173(4):262-267
pubmed: 32422057
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 17;11(1):4704
pubmed: 32943637
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;20(7):809-815
pubmed: 32330439
Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 Jul;20(7):392-394
pubmed: 32514035
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1200-1204
pubmed: 32555424
Sci Immunol. 2020 May 19;5(47):
pubmed: 32430309
Science. 2020 Aug 14;369(6505):806-811
pubmed: 32434945
Science. 2020 Aug 14;369(6505):812-817
pubmed: 32434946