3D Printed frames to enable reuse and improve the fit of N95 and KN95 respirators.
3D printing
COVID-19
KN95 masks
N95 respirators
filtering face piece (FFP) respirator
mask frames
occupational health
pandemic response
personal protective equipment (PPE)
prototyping
Journal
medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences
Titre abrégé: medRxiv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101767986
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Jul 2020
26 Jul 2020
Historique:
entrez:
4
8
2020
pubmed:
4
8
2020
medline:
4
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In response to supply shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic, N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs or "masks"), which are typically single-use devices in healthcare settings, are routinely being used for prolonged periods and in some cases decontaminated under "reuse" and "extended use" policies. However, the reusability of N95 masks is often limited by degradation or breakage of elastic head bands and issues with mask fit after repeated use. The purpose of this study was to develop a frame for N95 masks, using readily available materials and 3D printing, which could replace defective or broken bands and improve fit. An iterative design process yielded a mask frame consisting of two 3D-printed side pieces, malleable wire links that users press against their face, and cut lengths of elastic material that go around the head to hold the frame and mask in place. Volunteers (n= 41; average BMI= 25.5), of whom 31 were women, underwent qualitative fit with and without mask frames and one or more of four different brands of FFRs conforming to US N95 or Chinese KN95 standards. Masks passed qualitative fit testing in the absence of a frame at rates varying from 48 - 92% (depending on mask model and tester). For individuals for whom a mask passed testing, 75-100% (average = 86%) also passed testing with a frame holding the mask in place. Among users for whom a mask failed in initial fit testing, 41% passed using a frame. Success varied with mask model and across individuals. The use of mask frames can prolong the lifespan of N95 and KN95 masks by serving as a substitute for broken or defective bands without adversely affecting fit. Frames also have the potential to improve fit for some individuals who cannot fit existing masks. Frames therefore represent a simple and inexpensive way of extending the life and utility of PPE in short supply. For clinicians and institutions interested in mask frames, designs and specifications are provided without restriction for use or modification. To ensure adequate performance in clinical settings, qualitative fit testing with user-specific masks and frames is required.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In response to supply shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic, N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs or "masks"), which are typically single-use devices in healthcare settings, are routinely being used for prolonged periods and in some cases decontaminated under "reuse" and "extended use" policies. However, the reusability of N95 masks is often limited by degradation or breakage of elastic head bands and issues with mask fit after repeated use. The purpose of this study was to develop a frame for N95 masks, using readily available materials and 3D printing, which could replace defective or broken bands and improve fit.
RESULTS
RESULTS
An iterative design process yielded a mask frame consisting of two 3D-printed side pieces, malleable wire links that users press against their face, and cut lengths of elastic material that go around the head to hold the frame and mask in place. Volunteers (n= 41; average BMI= 25.5), of whom 31 were women, underwent qualitative fit with and without mask frames and one or more of four different brands of FFRs conforming to US N95 or Chinese KN95 standards. Masks passed qualitative fit testing in the absence of a frame at rates varying from 48 - 92% (depending on mask model and tester). For individuals for whom a mask passed testing, 75-100% (average = 86%) also passed testing with a frame holding the mask in place. Among users for whom a mask failed in initial fit testing, 41% passed using a frame. Success varied with mask model and across individuals.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The use of mask frames can prolong the lifespan of N95 and KN95 masks by serving as a substitute for broken or defective bands without adversely affecting fit. Frames also have the potential to improve fit for some individuals who cannot fit existing masks. Frames therefore represent a simple and inexpensive way of extending the life and utility of PPE in short supply. For clinicians and institutions interested in mask frames, designs and specifications are provided without restriction for use or modification. To ensure adequate performance in clinical settings, qualitative fit testing with user-specific masks and frames is required.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32743606
doi: 10.1101/2020.07.20.20151019
pmc: PMC7386530
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Preprint
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM007753
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U54 CA225088
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : UpdateIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests A Mostaghimi is a consultant or has received honoraria from Pfizer, 3Derm, and hims and has equity in Lucid Dermatology and hims. He is an associate editor for JAMA Dermatology. Mostaghimi declares that none of these relationships are directly or indirectly related to the content of this manuscript.PK Sorger is a member of the SAB or Board of Directors of Applied Biomath, Glencoe Software and RareCyte Inc and has equity in these companies. In the last five years the Sorger lab has received research funding from Novartis and Merck. Sorger declares that none of these relationships are directly or indirectly related to the content of this manuscript.NR LeBoeuf is a consultant for or has received honoraria from the following companies: Seattle Genetics, Sanofi and Bayer.
Références
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Nov;41(11):1024-31
pubmed: 23932825
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0234851
pubmed: 32609741
J Virol Methods. 2015 Oct;223:13-8
pubmed: 26190637
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 27;12(11):e0188638
pubmed: 29176833
JAMA. 2020 Feb 24;:
pubmed: 32091533
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;31(10):1011-6
pubmed: 20731598
Am J Infect Control. 2009 Dec;37(10):e5-e16
pubmed: 20004810
3D Print Med. 2020 Apr 27;6(1):11
pubmed: 32337613
Int Endod J. 2020 May;53(5):723-725
pubmed: 32277770
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 3;19(1):491
pubmed: 31159777
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Sep;31(9):918-25
pubmed: 20658919
Int J Oral Sci. 2020 Mar 3;12(1):9
pubmed: 32127517
Am J Infect Control. 2008 May;36(4):298-300
pubmed: 18455051
JAMA. 2020 Feb 7;:
pubmed: 32031570
Ann Work Expo Health. 2019 Oct 11;63(8):930-936
pubmed: 31504129
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013;10(8):419-24
pubmed: 23767820
Am J Infect Control. 2012 May;40(4):375-80
pubmed: 21864945
JAMA. 2020 Jun 4;:
pubmed: 32496504