Ethnic variations in referrals to the Leicester memory and dementia assessment service, 2010 to 2017.
BAME
Dementia
diagnosis
primary care
referral
Journal
BJPsych open
ISSN: 2056-4724
Titre abrégé: BJPsych Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101667931
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Aug 2020
03 Aug 2020
Historique:
entrez:
4
8
2020
pubmed:
4
8
2020
medline:
4
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The incidence of dementia in Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) groups is increasing in the UK, with concern about underdiagnosis and late presentation. By reviewing referrals to memory clinics from Leicester City we examined whether the following differed by ethnicity: the proportion with a diagnosis of dementia, type of dementia and severity at presentation. We examined referrals between 2010 and 2017: all those whose ethnicity was recorded as Black (n = 131) and a random sample of 260 Asian and 259 White British referrals. Severity of dementia was assessed by record review. Odds ratios (ORs) were adjusted for general practice, age, gender and year of referral. A diagnosis of dementia was recorded in 193 (74.5%) White British, 96 (73.3%) Black and 160 (61.5%) Asian referrals. Compared with Asians, White British had twice the adjusted odds of a dementia diagnosis (OR = 1.99 (1.23-3.22). Of those with dementia, Alzheimer's disease was more common in White British (57.0%) than in Asian (43.8%) and Black referrals (51.0%): adjusted OR White British versus Asian 1.76 (1.11-2.77). Of those with dementia, the proportion with moderate/severe disease was highest in White British (66.8%), compared with 61.9% in Asian and 45.8% in Black groups. The adjusted OR for the White versus Black groups was 2.03 (1.10-3.72), with no significant difference between Asian and White British groups. Differences in confirmed dementia suggest general practitioners have a lower threshold for referral for possible dementia in some BAME groups. Unlike other centres, we found no evidence of greater severity at presentation in Asian and Black groups.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The incidence of dementia in Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) groups is increasing in the UK, with concern about underdiagnosis and late presentation.
AIMS
OBJECTIVE
By reviewing referrals to memory clinics from Leicester City we examined whether the following differed by ethnicity: the proportion with a diagnosis of dementia, type of dementia and severity at presentation.
METHOD
METHODS
We examined referrals between 2010 and 2017: all those whose ethnicity was recorded as Black (n = 131) and a random sample of 260 Asian and 259 White British referrals. Severity of dementia was assessed by record review. Odds ratios (ORs) were adjusted for general practice, age, gender and year of referral.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A diagnosis of dementia was recorded in 193 (74.5%) White British, 96 (73.3%) Black and 160 (61.5%) Asian referrals. Compared with Asians, White British had twice the adjusted odds of a dementia diagnosis (OR = 1.99 (1.23-3.22). Of those with dementia, Alzheimer's disease was more common in White British (57.0%) than in Asian (43.8%) and Black referrals (51.0%): adjusted OR White British versus Asian 1.76 (1.11-2.77). Of those with dementia, the proportion with moderate/severe disease was highest in White British (66.8%), compared with 61.9% in Asian and 45.8% in Black groups. The adjusted OR for the White versus Black groups was 2.03 (1.10-3.72), with no significant difference between Asian and White British groups.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Differences in confirmed dementia suggest general practitioners have a lower threshold for referral for possible dementia in some BAME groups. Unlike other centres, we found no evidence of greater severity at presentation in Asian and Black groups.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32744202
doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.69
pii: S2056472420000691
pmc: PMC7488308
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e83Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : PB-PG-0416-20019
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;26(1):12-20
pubmed: 21157846
BJPsych Bull. 2015 Aug;39(4):162-6
pubmed: 26755947
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;18(3):193-203
pubmed: 20224516
Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;41(1):33-42
pubmed: 21044979
BJPsych Bull. 2020 Aug;44(4):145-152
pubmed: 32066516
Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Aug 08;10:949-960
pubmed: 30123007
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;26(4):409-14
pubmed: 23454888
Int Psychogeriatr. 2011 Sep;23(7):1070-7
pubmed: 21349212
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 11;5(9):e007990
pubmed: 26362662
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;30(4):345-56
pubmed: 25503751
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;34(3):504-510
pubmed: 30675737
Neurology. 1993 Nov;43(11):2412-4
pubmed: 8232972
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;30(1):32-45
pubmed: 25132209