Is magnetic resonance imaging becoming the new computed tomography for cervical spine clearance? Trends in magnetic resonance imaging utilization at a Level I trauma center.
Adult
Cervical Vertebrae
/ diagnostic imaging
Emergency Service, Hospital
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Procedures and Techniques Utilization
Spinal Cord Injuries
/ diagnostic imaging
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
/ statistics & numerical data
Trauma Centers
United States
Unnecessary Procedures
Wounds, Nonpenetrating
/ diagnostic imaging
Journal
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
ISSN: 2163-0763
Titre abrégé: J Trauma Acute Care Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101570622
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
entrez:
4
8
2020
pubmed:
4
8
2020
medline:
28
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Increasing evidence supports the limited use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for cervical spine (C-spine) clearance following blunt trauma. We sought to characterize the utilization of MRI of the C-spine at a Level I trauma center. All blunt trauma patients undergoing a computed tomography (CT) of the C-spine between January 2009 and December 2018 were reviewed. The CT and MRI results, demographics, clinical presentation, subspecialty consultations, and interventions were recorded. The MRI results were considered clinically significant if they resulted in cervical thoracic orthosis/halo placement or surgical intervention. Linear regression models were utilized to identify trends. There were 9,101 patients that underwent a CT of the C-spine, with 513 (5.6%) being positive for an acute injury. MRI was obtained for 375 (4.1%) of patients. A linear increase in the proportion of patients undergoing an MRI was noted, from 0.9% in 2009 to 5.6% in 2018 (p < 0.01). Of the 513 patients with a positive CT, 290 (56.5%) had an MRI. In 40 (13.8%) of them, the CT demonstrated a minor injury. Clinically significant MRI findings were noted only in two (5.0%) of the 40 patients, and both had a neurologic deficit on initial examination. Of the 8,588 patients with a negative CT, 85 (1.0%) underwent an MRI. Of those, 9 (10.6%) had a clinically significant MRI with all but one presenting with a neurological deficit. MRI is increasingly utilized for C-spine clearance following blunt trauma. MRI was exceedingly unlikely to demonstrate a clinically significant finding in the absence of a neurological deficit, when the CT was negative or included minor injuries. Trauma centers are encouraged to constantly evaluate their own practices and intervene with education and collaboration to limit the excessive use of unnecessary resources. Therapeutic/Care Management Study, Level III or IV. Diagnostic test, level IV.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Increasing evidence supports the limited use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for cervical spine (C-spine) clearance following blunt trauma. We sought to characterize the utilization of MRI of the C-spine at a Level I trauma center.
METHODS
All blunt trauma patients undergoing a computed tomography (CT) of the C-spine between January 2009 and December 2018 were reviewed. The CT and MRI results, demographics, clinical presentation, subspecialty consultations, and interventions were recorded. The MRI results were considered clinically significant if they resulted in cervical thoracic orthosis/halo placement or surgical intervention. Linear regression models were utilized to identify trends.
RESULTS
There were 9,101 patients that underwent a CT of the C-spine, with 513 (5.6%) being positive for an acute injury. MRI was obtained for 375 (4.1%) of patients. A linear increase in the proportion of patients undergoing an MRI was noted, from 0.9% in 2009 to 5.6% in 2018 (p < 0.01). Of the 513 patients with a positive CT, 290 (56.5%) had an MRI. In 40 (13.8%) of them, the CT demonstrated a minor injury. Clinically significant MRI findings were noted only in two (5.0%) of the 40 patients, and both had a neurologic deficit on initial examination. Of the 8,588 patients with a negative CT, 85 (1.0%) underwent an MRI. Of those, 9 (10.6%) had a clinically significant MRI with all but one presenting with a neurological deficit.
CONCLUSION
MRI is increasingly utilized for C-spine clearance following blunt trauma. MRI was exceedingly unlikely to demonstrate a clinically significant finding in the absence of a neurological deficit, when the CT was negative or included minor injuries. Trauma centers are encouraged to constantly evaluate their own practices and intervene with education and collaboration to limit the excessive use of unnecessary resources.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic/Care Management Study, Level III or IV. Diagnostic test, level IV.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32744833
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002752
pii: 01586154-202008000-00016
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
365-370Références
Grossman MD, Reilly PM, Gillett T, Gillett D. National survey of the incidence of cervical spine injury and approach to cervical spine clearance in U.S. trauma Centers. J Trauma. 1999;47(4):684–690.
Hasler RM, Exadaktylos AK, Bouamra O, Benneker LM, Clancy M, Sieber R, Zimmerman H, Lecky F. Epidemiology and predictors of cervical spine injury in adult major trauma patients: a multicenter cohort study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(4):975–981.
Young AJ, Wolfe L, Tinkoff G, Duane TM. Assessing incidence and risk factors of cervical spine injury in blunt trauma patients using the national trauma data bank. Am Surg. 2015;81(9):879–883.
Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, Todd KH, Zucker MI. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(2):94–99.
Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA. 2001;286(15):1841–1848.
Inaba K, Byerly S, Bush LD, et al. Cervical spinal clearance: a prospective Western Trauma Association Multi-institutional Trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(6):1122–1129.
Vanguri P, Young AJ, Weber WF, Katzen J, Wolfe LG, Duane TM. Computed tomographic scan: it's not just about the fracture. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77(4):604–607.
Raza M, Elkhodair S, Zaheer A, Yousaf S. Safe cervical spine clearance in adult obtunded blunt trauma patients on the basis of a normal multidetector CT scan—a meta-analysis and cohort study. Injury. 2013;44(11):1589–1595.
Pekmezci M, Theologis AA, Dionisio R, MacKersie R, McClellan RT. Cervical spine clearance protocols in level I, II, and III trauma centers in California. Spine J. 2015;15(3):398–404.
Albaghdadi A, Leeds IL, Florecki KL, Canner JK, Schneider EB, Sakran JV, Haut ER. Variation in the use of MRI for cervical spine clearance: an opportunity to simultaneously improve clinical care and decrease cost. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2019;4(1):ss.
Martin MJ, Bush LD, Inaba K, et al. Cervical spine evaluation and clearance in the intoxicated patient: a prospective Western Trauma Association Multi-Institutional Trial and Survey. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(6):1032–1040.
Patel MB, Humble SS, Cullinane DC, et al. Cervical spine collar clearance in the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient: a systematic review and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(2):430–441.
Mathen R, Inaba K, Munera F, Teixeira PG, Rivas L, McKenney M, Lopez P, Ledezma CJ. Prospective evaluation of multislice computed tomography versus plain radiographic cervical spine clearance in trauma patients. J Trauma. 2007;62(6):1427–1431.
Resnick S, Inaba K, Karamanos E, Pham M, Byerly S, Talving P, Reddy S, Linnebur M, Demetriades D. Clinical relevance of magnetic resonance imaging in cervical spine clearance: a prospective study. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(9):934–939.
Satahoo SS, Davis JS, Garcia GD, Alsafran S, Pandya RK, Richie CD, Habib F, Rivas L, Namias N, Schulman CI. Sticking our neck out: is magnetic resonance imaging needed to clear an obtunded patient's cervical spine? J Surg Res. 2014;187(1):225–229.
Panczykowski DM, Tomycz ND, Okonkwo DO. Comparative effectiveness of using computed tomography alone to exclude cervical spine injuries in obtunded or intubated patients: meta-analysis of 14,327 patients with blunt trauma. J Neurosurg. 2011;115(3):541–549.