Serologic responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection among hospital staff with mild disease in eastern France.
Adult
Antibodies, Neutralizing
/ blood
Antibodies, Viral
/ blood
Betacoronavirus
/ genetics
COVID-19
Coronavirus Infections
/ diagnosis
Female
France
Health Personnel
Hospitals
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pandemics
Pneumonia, Viral
/ diagnosis
RNA, Viral
/ metabolism
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
SARS-CoV-2
Serologic Tests
Severity of Illness Index
Antibodies
Mild covid-19
Neutralization
Serology
sars-cov-2
Journal
EBioMedicine
ISSN: 2352-3964
Titre abrégé: EBioMedicine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101647039
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
22
05
2020
revised:
10
07
2020
accepted:
10
07
2020
pubmed:
5
8
2020
medline:
2
10
2020
entrez:
5
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The serologic response of individuals with mild forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection is poorly characterized. Hospital staff who had recovered from mild forms of PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using two assays: a rapid immunodiagnostic test (99.4% specificity) and the S-Flow assay (~99% specificity). The neutralizing activity of the sera was tested with a pseudovirus-based assay. Of 162 hospital staff who participated in the investigation, 160 reported SARS-CoV-2 infection that had not required hospital admission and were included in these analyses. The median time from symptom onset to blood sample collection was 24 days (IQR: 21-28, range 13-39). The rapid immunodiagnostic test detected antibodies in 153 (95.6%) of the samples and the S-Flow assay in 159 (99.4%), failing to detect antibodies in one sample collected 18 days after symptom onset (the rapid test did not detect antibodies in that patient). Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) were detected in 79%, 92% and 98% of samples collected 13-20, 21-27 and 28-41 days after symptom onset, respectively (P = 0.02). Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were detected in virtually all hospital staff sampled from 13 days after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms. This finding supports the use of serologic testing for the diagnosis of individuals who have recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection. The neutralizing activity of the antibodies increased overtime. Future studies will help assess the persistence of the humoral response and its associated neutralization capacity in recovered patients. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The serologic response of individuals with mild forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection is poorly characterized.
METHODS
METHODS
Hospital staff who had recovered from mild forms of PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using two assays: a rapid immunodiagnostic test (99.4% specificity) and the S-Flow assay (~99% specificity). The neutralizing activity of the sera was tested with a pseudovirus-based assay.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
Of 162 hospital staff who participated in the investigation, 160 reported SARS-CoV-2 infection that had not required hospital admission and were included in these analyses. The median time from symptom onset to blood sample collection was 24 days (IQR: 21-28, range 13-39). The rapid immunodiagnostic test detected antibodies in 153 (95.6%) of the samples and the S-Flow assay in 159 (99.4%), failing to detect antibodies in one sample collected 18 days after symptom onset (the rapid test did not detect antibodies in that patient). Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) were detected in 79%, 92% and 98% of samples collected 13-20, 21-27 and 28-41 days after symptom onset, respectively (P = 0.02).
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were detected in virtually all hospital staff sampled from 13 days after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms. This finding supports the use of serologic testing for the diagnosis of individuals who have recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection. The neutralizing activity of the antibodies increased overtime. Future studies will help assess the persistence of the humoral response and its associated neutralization capacity in recovered patients.
FUNDINGS
RESULTS
The funders had no role in study design, data collection, interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32747185
pii: S2352-3964(20)30290-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102915
pmc: PMC7502660
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Neutralizing
0
Antibodies, Viral
0
RNA, Viral
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102915Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest SFK, YM, RG, LT, FA, PS, CSM, NC, AB, AV, NL, MM, NM, DR.., BH, JDS and AF have no competing interest to declare. PC is the founder and CSO of TheraVectys. LG, IS, TB, and OS are holder of a provisional patent on the S-Flow assay. Dr. Schwartz has a patent "Methods and products for serological analysis of SARS-COV-2 Infection" pending on the S-Flow assay. Dr. Rey reports grants and personal fees from Mylan, personal fees from ViiV Healthcare, grants from Gilead, grants from Abbvie, outside the submitted work.
Références
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 19;71(16):2027-2034
pubmed: 32221519
Nat Med. 2020 Nov;26(11):1708-1713
pubmed: 32934372
Nat Med. 2020 Jul;26(7):1033-1036
pubmed: 32398876
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1200-1204
pubmed: 32555424
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):778-785
pubmed: 32198501
Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Sep;22(9):1554-61
pubmed: 27532807
Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 Jun;20(6):339-341
pubmed: 32317716
Front Microbiol. 2020 Oct 19;11:584251
pubmed: 33193227
Euro Surveill. 2020 Feb;25(6):
pubmed: 32070465
Respirology. 2006 Jan;11(1):49-53
pubmed: 16423201
Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):465-469
pubmed: 32235945
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;20(6):669-677
pubmed: 32240634
Int J Infect Dis. 2014 Dec;29:307-8
pubmed: 25448335
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;98(4):115181
pubmed: 32957073
Science. 2020 Jul 10;369(6500):208-211
pubmed: 32404476
Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 Jul;23(7):1079-1084
pubmed: 28585916
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):565-574
pubmed: 32213337
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;26(7):1478-1488
pubmed: 32267220
Science. 2020 Aug 14;369(6505):812-817
pubmed: 32434946
Nat Commun. 2020 Mar 27;11(1):1620
pubmed: 32221306
Cell. 2020 Apr 16;181(2):271-280.e8
pubmed: 32142651
Science. 2020 Jun 5;368(6495):1060-1061
pubmed: 32414781
Emerg Infect Dis. 2015 Dec;21(12):2186-9
pubmed: 26583829