Effect of an E-Learning Module on Personal Protective Equipment Proficiency Among Prehospital Personnel: Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.
COVID-19
communication
electronic learning
equipment
gamified
online learning
personal protective equipment
prehospital
protection
randomized controlled trial
safety
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 08 2020
21 08 2020
Historique:
received:
13
06
2020
accepted:
03
08
2020
revised:
02
08
2020
pubmed:
5
8
2020
medline:
2
9
2020
entrez:
5
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To avoid misuse of personal protective equipment (PPE), ensure health care workers' safety, and avoid shortages, effective communication of up-to-date infection control guidelines is essential. As prehospital teams are particularly at risk of contamination given their challenging work environment, a specific gamified electronic learning (e-learning) module targeting this audience might provide significant advantages as it requires neither the presence of learners nor the repetitive use of equipment for demonstration. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a gamified e-learning module could improve the rate of adequate PPE choice by prehospital personnel in the context of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. This was an individual-level randomized, controlled, quadruple-blind (investigators, participants, outcome assessors, and data analysts) closed web-based trial. All emergency prehospital personnel working in Geneva, Switzerland, were eligible for inclusion, and were invited to participate by email in April 2020. Participants were informed that the study aim was to assess their knowledge regarding PPE, and that they would be presented with both the guidelines and the e-learning module, though they were unaware that there were two different study paths. All participants first answered a preintervention quiz designed to establish their profile and baseline knowledge. The control group then accessed the guidelines before answering a second set of questions, and were then granted access to the e-learning module. The e-learning group was shown the e-learning module right after the guidelines and before answering the second set of questions. Of the 291 randomized participants, 176 (60.5%) completed the trial. There was no significant difference in baseline knowledge between groups. Though the baseline proportion of adequate PPE choice was high (75%, IQR 50%-75%), participants' description of the donning sequence was in most cases incorrect. After either intervention, adequate choice of PPE increased significantly in both groups (P<.001). Though the median of the difference in the proportion of correct answers was slightly higher in the e-learning group (17%, IQR 8%-33% versus 8%, IQR 8%-33%), the difference was not statistically significant (P=.27). Confidence in the ability to use PPE was maintained in the e-learning group (P=.27) but significantly decreased in the control group (P=.04). Among prehospital personnel with an already relatively high knowledge of and experience with PPE use, both web-based study paths increased the rate of adequate choice of PPE. There was no major added value of the gamified e-learning module apart from preserving participants' confidence in their ability to correctly use PPE.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
To avoid misuse of personal protective equipment (PPE), ensure health care workers' safety, and avoid shortages, effective communication of up-to-date infection control guidelines is essential. As prehospital teams are particularly at risk of contamination given their challenging work environment, a specific gamified electronic learning (e-learning) module targeting this audience might provide significant advantages as it requires neither the presence of learners nor the repetitive use of equipment for demonstration.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a gamified e-learning module could improve the rate of adequate PPE choice by prehospital personnel in the context of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic.
METHODS
This was an individual-level randomized, controlled, quadruple-blind (investigators, participants, outcome assessors, and data analysts) closed web-based trial. All emergency prehospital personnel working in Geneva, Switzerland, were eligible for inclusion, and were invited to participate by email in April 2020. Participants were informed that the study aim was to assess their knowledge regarding PPE, and that they would be presented with both the guidelines and the e-learning module, though they were unaware that there were two different study paths. All participants first answered a preintervention quiz designed to establish their profile and baseline knowledge. The control group then accessed the guidelines before answering a second set of questions, and were then granted access to the e-learning module. The e-learning group was shown the e-learning module right after the guidelines and before answering the second set of questions.
RESULTS
Of the 291 randomized participants, 176 (60.5%) completed the trial. There was no significant difference in baseline knowledge between groups. Though the baseline proportion of adequate PPE choice was high (75%, IQR 50%-75%), participants' description of the donning sequence was in most cases incorrect. After either intervention, adequate choice of PPE increased significantly in both groups (P<.001). Though the median of the difference in the proportion of correct answers was slightly higher in the e-learning group (17%, IQR 8%-33% versus 8%, IQR 8%-33%), the difference was not statistically significant (P=.27). Confidence in the ability to use PPE was maintained in the e-learning group (P=.27) but significantly decreased in the control group (P=.04).
CONCLUSIONS
Among prehospital personnel with an already relatively high knowledge of and experience with PPE use, both web-based study paths increased the rate of adequate choice of PPE. There was no major added value of the gamified e-learning module apart from preserving participants' confidence in their ability to correctly use PPE.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32747329
pii: v22i8e21265
doi: 10.2196/21265
pmc: PMC7446759
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e21265Informations de copyright
©Laurent Suppan, Mohamed Abbas, Loric Stuby, Philippe Cottet, Robert Larribau, Eric Golay, Anne Iten, Stephan Harbarth, Birgit Gartner, Mélanie Suppan. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 21.08.2020.
Références
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Jan 1;45(1):17-23
pubmed: 28065328
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Jun 1;44(6):647-51
pubmed: 26874405
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 Nov;23(11):819-825
pubmed: 28571767
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;20(7):777-778
pubmed: 32213335
NPJ Sci Learn. 2019 Sep 24;4:15
pubmed: 31583117
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 18;17(8):
pubmed: 32325718
Perspect Clin Res. 2015 Jul-Sep;6(3):169-70
pubmed: 26229754
J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 29;6(3):e34
pubmed: 15471760
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 22;18(11):e301
pubmed: 27876687
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Sep;15(9):1034-1040
pubmed: 26201298
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 22;22(5):e17101
pubmed: 32441655
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 2;21(10):e15118
pubmed: 31579016
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 19;18(1):e15
pubmed: 26786976
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 May 08;:1-3
pubmed: 32381140
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4:CD013582
pubmed: 32315451
JAMA. 2020 Mar 28;:
pubmed: 32221579
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Aug;88:901-907
pubmed: 32437915
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):e41
pubmed: 32212516
Am J Infect Control. 2015 Jun;43(6):606-11
pubmed: 26042849
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 9;22(6):e18358
pubmed: 32299792
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Mar 31;7(1):e11
pubmed: 15829473
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):114
pubmed: 28697744
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015 Apr-Jun;19(2):313-9
pubmed: 25415186
JMIR Serious Games. 2020 Jun 12;8(2):e20173
pubmed: 32516115
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Feb 2;17(1):30
pubmed: 28148296
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Aug;55:38-44
pubmed: 28521248
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Winter;15(4):
pubmed: 27789532
Can J Anaesth. 2020 May;67(5):568-576
pubmed: 32052373
Can J Anaesth. 2020 Aug;67(8):1005-1015
pubmed: 32329014
J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 16;9(1):
pubmed: 31963162
Eur Respir J. 2020 Mar 20;55(3):
pubmed: 32198275
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 31;13(4):e126
pubmed: 22209829
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jul 10;725:138532
pubmed: 32304970
JAMA. 2020 Mar 31;:
pubmed: 32232420
Mem Cognit. 2016 Oct;44(7):1127-37
pubmed: 27270923
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Jun;18(2):ar16
pubmed: 31025916