Redox Homeostasis and Inflammation Responses to Training in Adolescent Athletes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Acute and chronic responses
Adolescent athletes
Inflammation
Redox homeostasis
Journal
Sports medicine - open
ISSN: 2199-1170
Titre abrégé: Sports Med Open
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101662568
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Aug 2020
03 Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
10
03
2020
accepted:
13
07
2020
entrez:
5
8
2020
pubmed:
5
8
2020
medline:
5
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Several studies have highlighted the substantial role of the athlete's redox and inflammation status during the training process. However, many factors such as differences in testing protocols, assays, sample sizes, and fitness levels of the population are affecting findings and the understanding regarding how exercise affects related biomarkers in adolescent athletes. To search redox homeostasis variables' and inflammatory mediators' responses in juvenile athletes following short- or long-term training periods and examine the effect size of those variations to training paradigms. A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. The entire content of PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Science Direct were systematically searched until December 2019. Studies with outcomes including (1) a group of adolescent athletes from any individual or team sport, (2) the assessment of redox and/or inflammatory markers after a short- (training session or performance testing) or longer training period, and (3) variables measured in blood were retained. The literature search initially identified 346 potentially relevant records, of which 36 studies met the inclusion criteria for the qualitative synthesis. From those articles, 27 were included in the quantitative analysis (meta-analysis) as their results could be converted into common units. Following a short training session or performance test, an extremely large increase in protein carbonyls (PC) (ES 4.164; 95% CI 1.716 to 6.613; Z = 3.333, p = 0.001), a large increase in thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) (ES 1.317; 95% CI 0.522 to 2.112; Z = 3.247, p = 0.001), a large decrease in glutathione (GSH) (ES - 1.701; 95% CI - 2.698 to - 0.705; Z = - 3.347, p = 0.001), and a moderate increase of total antioxidant capacity (TAC) level (ES 1.057; 95% CI - 0.044 to 2.158; Z = 1.882, p = 0.060) were observed. Following more extended training periods, GSH showed moderate increases (ES 1.131; 95% CI 0.350 to 1.913; Z = 2.839, p = 0.005) while TBARS displayed a small decrease (ES 0.568; 95% CI - 0.062 to 1.197; Z = 1.768, p = 0.077). Regarding cytokines, a very large and large increase were observed in IL-6 (ES 2.291; 95% CI 1.082 to 3.501; Z = 3.713, p = 0.000) and IL-1 receptor antagonist (ra) (ES 1.599; 95% CI 0.347 to 2.851; Z = 2.503, p = 0.012), respectively, following short-duration training modalities in juvenile athletes. The results showed significant alterations in oxidative stress and cytokine levels after acute exercise, ranging from moderate to extremely large. In contrast, the variations after chronic exercise ranged from trivial to moderate. However, the observed publication bias and high heterogeneity in specific meta-analysis advocate the need for further exploration and consistency when we deal with the assessed variables to ascertain the implications of structured training regimes on measured variables in order to develop guidelines for training, nutritional advice, and wellbeing in young athletes. PROSPERO CRD42020152105.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Several studies have highlighted the substantial role of the athlete's redox and inflammation status during the training process. However, many factors such as differences in testing protocols, assays, sample sizes, and fitness levels of the population are affecting findings and the understanding regarding how exercise affects related biomarkers in adolescent athletes.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To search redox homeostasis variables' and inflammatory mediators' responses in juvenile athletes following short- or long-term training periods and examine the effect size of those variations to training paradigms.
METHODS
METHODS
A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. The entire content of PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Science Direct were systematically searched until December 2019. Studies with outcomes including (1) a group of adolescent athletes from any individual or team sport, (2) the assessment of redox and/or inflammatory markers after a short- (training session or performance testing) or longer training period, and (3) variables measured in blood were retained. The literature search initially identified 346 potentially relevant records, of which 36 studies met the inclusion criteria for the qualitative synthesis. From those articles, 27 were included in the quantitative analysis (meta-analysis) as their results could be converted into common units.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Following a short training session or performance test, an extremely large increase in protein carbonyls (PC) (ES 4.164; 95% CI 1.716 to 6.613; Z = 3.333, p = 0.001), a large increase in thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) (ES 1.317; 95% CI 0.522 to 2.112; Z = 3.247, p = 0.001), a large decrease in glutathione (GSH) (ES - 1.701; 95% CI - 2.698 to - 0.705; Z = - 3.347, p = 0.001), and a moderate increase of total antioxidant capacity (TAC) level (ES 1.057; 95% CI - 0.044 to 2.158; Z = 1.882, p = 0.060) were observed. Following more extended training periods, GSH showed moderate increases (ES 1.131; 95% CI 0.350 to 1.913; Z = 2.839, p = 0.005) while TBARS displayed a small decrease (ES 0.568; 95% CI - 0.062 to 1.197; Z = 1.768, p = 0.077). Regarding cytokines, a very large and large increase were observed in IL-6 (ES 2.291; 95% CI 1.082 to 3.501; Z = 3.713, p = 0.000) and IL-1 receptor antagonist (ra) (ES 1.599; 95% CI 0.347 to 2.851; Z = 2.503, p = 0.012), respectively, following short-duration training modalities in juvenile athletes.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The results showed significant alterations in oxidative stress and cytokine levels after acute exercise, ranging from moderate to extremely large. In contrast, the variations after chronic exercise ranged from trivial to moderate. However, the observed publication bias and high heterogeneity in specific meta-analysis advocate the need for further exploration and consistency when we deal with the assessed variables to ascertain the implications of structured training regimes on measured variables in order to develop guidelines for training, nutritional advice, and wellbeing in young athletes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
PROSPERO CRD42020152105.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32748060
doi: 10.1186/s40798-020-00262-x
pii: 10.1186/s40798-020-00262-x
pmc: PMC7399016
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
34Références
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2012;25(9-10):875-80
pubmed: 23426816
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Jan;23(1):225-30
pubmed: 19057403
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2018 Feb;222(2):
pubmed: 28544643
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Nov;22(11):995-1007
pubmed: 20101885
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Jun;52(6):377-84
pubmed: 9764259
Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):455-63
pubmed: 10877304
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Nov;27(11):3110-5
pubmed: 23442267
Front Physiol. 2016 Nov 07;7:486
pubmed: 27872595
Ageing Res Rev. 2008 Jan;7(1):34-42
pubmed: 17869589
Sports Med. 2015 Apr;45(4):453-71
pubmed: 25398224
Int J Sports Med. 2016 Aug;37(9):680-6
pubmed: 27286182
Int J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;39(14):1041-1048
pubmed: 30419577
J Sports Sci. 2014;32(11):1050-9
pubmed: 24479737
J Sports Sci Med. 2013 Jun 01;12(2):282-9
pubmed: 24149807
Asian J Sports Med. 2012 Dec;3(4):239-46
pubmed: 23342222
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Biomolecules. 2015 Apr 10;5(2):356-77
pubmed: 25866921
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Feb;35(2):356-63
pubmed: 12569228
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1998 May;76(5):533-8
pubmed: 9839079
J Sports Sci. 2019 Apr;37(7):827-832
pubmed: 30306821
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007 Apr;32(2):197-205
pubmed: 17486160
J Physiol. 1999 Feb 15;515 ( Pt 1):287-91
pubmed: 9925898
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2015;2015:283921
pubmed: 25945150
Biomarkers. 2012 Feb;17(1):28-35
pubmed: 22288504
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Aug;23(5):1418-26
pubmed: 19620924
J Sci Med Sport. 2009 Nov;12(6):691-6
pubmed: 18768362
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 May;36(5):794-800
pubmed: 15126712
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
pubmed: 9310563
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Apr;33(4):564-7
pubmed: 11283431
J Sports Sci. 2014;32(8):747-56
pubmed: 24404835
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2014 Jun;54(3):354-61
pubmed: 24739299
Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Jul 22;14(7):15167-78
pubmed: 23880864
Pediatrics. 2002 Oct;110(4):681-9
pubmed: 12359780
Sports Med. 2015 Mar;45(3):379-409
pubmed: 25319354
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Nov;110(5):971-6
pubmed: 20668873
J Sports Sci. 2008 Oct;26(12):1303-11
pubmed: 18821123
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:230271
pubmed: 25379522
Gen Physiol Biophys. 2012 Jun;31(2):211-9
pubmed: 22781825
Biol Sport. 2018 Jun;35(2):121-136
pubmed: 30455540
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Aug;23(5):1553-9
pubmed: 19620907
Sports Med. 2006;36(4):327-58
pubmed: 16573358
Acta Physiol Hung. 2013 Mar;100(1):64-76
pubmed: 23471042
FEBS Lett. 2004 Jan 30;558(1-3):3-6
pubmed: 14982062
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Mar;8(1):5-18
pubmed: 28058794
Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2010 Feb;22(1):60-8
pubmed: 20332540
Redox Rep. 2010;15(6):275-81
pubmed: 21208527
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
pubmed: 12958120