Endoscopic mucosal incision and muscle interruption (MIMI) for the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum.


Journal

Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2021
Historique:
received: 15 04 2020
accepted: 28 07 2020
pubmed: 5 8 2020
medline: 30 9 2021
entrez: 5 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In peroral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker's diverticulum (Z-POEM), the cricopharyngeus muscle is divided within a submucosal tunnel started in the hypopharynx. We aimed to evaluate the safety and preliminary outcomes in patients who underwent a modified version of the Z-POEM where the tunnel is made directly overlying the cricopharyngeus, the mucosal incision and muscular interruption (MIMI) approach, and to compare these with patients who underwent a non-tunneled flexible endoscopic approach. All patients with ZD who were treated by flexible endoscopy at our institution between January 2015 and February 2020 were identified by a retrospective chart review. Dysphagia symptoms were assessed using a validated scoring system. Nineteen patients with ZD underwent MIMI (mean age 76.1 years, 68.1% male) and seven patients underwent non-tunneled flexible endoscopic approach (mean age 64.4 years, 85.7% male) during the study period. Mean ZD size was 2.8 cm in the MIMI group and 1.9 cm in the non-tunneled group (p = 0.03). Clinical success was achieved in 17/19(89.5%) MIMI patients and 7/7(100%) of non-tunneled flexible endoscopic patients (p = 0.101). Dysphagia scores improved in both groups, although this difference was only significant in the MIMI group (p ≤ 0.001). Recurrence occurred in 2/17(11.7%) MIMI patients and 3/7(42.9%) non-tunneled flexible endoscopic patients (p = 0.096). There were 4 complications, including one pharyngeal perforation requiring open surgical repair in a patient with a small ZD with an associated cricopharyngeal bar in the MIMI group. Median length of follow-up was 290 [142; 465] days in the MIMI group and 1056 [258; 1206] days in the non-tunneled group (p = 0.094). MIMI is a technically feasible and effective treatment for ZD. Care should be taken in patients with a cricopharyngeal bar and small ZD, as this may increase the risk of perforation. Larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed to determine if MIMI reduces the risk of symptom recurrence when compared to non-tunneled flexible endoscopic approaches.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
In peroral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker's diverticulum (Z-POEM), the cricopharyngeus muscle is divided within a submucosal tunnel started in the hypopharynx. We aimed to evaluate the safety and preliminary outcomes in patients who underwent a modified version of the Z-POEM where the tunnel is made directly overlying the cricopharyngeus, the mucosal incision and muscular interruption (MIMI) approach, and to compare these with patients who underwent a non-tunneled flexible endoscopic approach.
METHODS
All patients with ZD who were treated by flexible endoscopy at our institution between January 2015 and February 2020 were identified by a retrospective chart review. Dysphagia symptoms were assessed using a validated scoring system.
RESULTS
Nineteen patients with ZD underwent MIMI (mean age 76.1 years, 68.1% male) and seven patients underwent non-tunneled flexible endoscopic approach (mean age 64.4 years, 85.7% male) during the study period. Mean ZD size was 2.8 cm in the MIMI group and 1.9 cm in the non-tunneled group (p = 0.03). Clinical success was achieved in 17/19(89.5%) MIMI patients and 7/7(100%) of non-tunneled flexible endoscopic patients (p = 0.101). Dysphagia scores improved in both groups, although this difference was only significant in the MIMI group (p ≤ 0.001). Recurrence occurred in 2/17(11.7%) MIMI patients and 3/7(42.9%) non-tunneled flexible endoscopic patients (p = 0.096). There were 4 complications, including one pharyngeal perforation requiring open surgical repair in a patient with a small ZD with an associated cricopharyngeal bar in the MIMI group. Median length of follow-up was 290 [142; 465] days in the MIMI group and 1056 [258; 1206] days in the non-tunneled group (p = 0.094).
CONCLUSIONS
MIMI is a technically feasible and effective treatment for ZD. Care should be taken in patients with a cricopharyngeal bar and small ZD, as this may increase the risk of perforation. Larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed to determine if MIMI reduces the risk of symptom recurrence when compared to non-tunneled flexible endoscopic approaches.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32748264
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07861-5
pii: 10.1007/s00464-020-07861-5
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3896-3904

Références

Cook IJ, Gabb M, Panagopoulos V, Jamieson GG, Dodds WJ, Dent J, Shearman DJ (1992) Pharyngeal (Zenker’s) diverticulum is a disorder of upper esophageal sphincter opening. Gastroenterology 103:1229–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(92)91508-2
doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(92)91508-2 pubmed: 1397879
Watemberg S, Landau O, Avrahami R (1996) Zenker’s diverticulum: reappraisal. Am J Gastroenterol 91:1494–1498
pubmed: 8759648
Albers D, Kondo A, Bernardo W, Sakai P, Moura R, Silva G, Ide E, Tomishige T, de Moura E (2016) Endoscopic versus surgical approach in the treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 04:E678–E686. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-106203
doi: 10.1055/s-0042-106203
Costamagna G, Iacopini F, Bizzotto A, Familiari P, Tringali A, Perri V, Bella A (2016) Prognostic variables for the clinical success of flexible endoscopic septotomy of Zenker’s diverticulum. Gastrointest Endosc 83:765–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.044
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.044 pubmed: 26344886
Ishioka S, Sakai P, Filho FM, Melo JM (1995) Endoscopic incision of Zenker’s diverticula. Endoscopy 27:433–437. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1005736
doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1005736 pubmed: 8549440
Mulder CJ, den Hartog G, Robijn RJ, Thies JE (1995) Flexible endoscopic treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum: a new approach. Endoscopy 27:438–442. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1005737
doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1005737 pubmed: 8549441
Rouquette O, Abergel A, Mulliez A, Poincloux L (2017) Usefulness of the Hook knife in flexible endoscopic myotomy for Zenker’s diverticulum. WJGE 9:411. https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v9.i8.411
doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i8.411 pubmed: 28874962
Rabenstein T, May A, Michel J, Manner H, Pech O, Gossner L, Ell C (2007) Argon plasma coagulation for flexible endoscopic Zenker’s diverticulotomy. Endoscopy 39:141–145. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-966164
doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966164 pubmed: 17327972
Li Q-L, Chen W-F, Zhang X-C, Cai M-Y, Zhang Y-Q, Hu J-W, He M-J, Yao L-Q, Zhou P-H, Xu M-D (2016) Submucosal tunneling endoscopic septum division: a novel technique for treating Zenker’s diverticulum. Gastroenterology 151:1071–1074. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.064
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.064 pubmed: 27664512
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
Dakkak M, Bennett J (1992) A new dysphagia score with objective validation. J Clin Gastroenterol 14:99–100
doi: 10.1097/00004836-199203000-00004
Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, Baron TH, Hutter MM, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Nemcek A, Petersen BT, Petrini JL, Pike IM, Rabeneck L, Romagnuolo J, Vargo JJ (2010) A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 71:446–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027 pubmed: 20189503
Brieau B, Leblanc S, Bordacahar B, Barret M, Coriat R, Prat F, Chaussade S (2017) Submucosal tunneling endoscopic septum division for Zenker’s diverticulum: a reproducible procedure for endoscopists who perform peroral endoscopic myotomy. Endoscopy 49:613–614. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-105574
doi: 10.1055/s-0043-105574 pubmed: 28464200
Shen B, Jiang H, Li Z, Wang Z, Song H, Ding X (2020) Zenker’s diverticulum treated with submucosal tunneling endoscopic septum division surgery: two case reports. Medicine (Baltimore) 99:e18659. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018659
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018659
Hernández Mondragón OV, Solórzano Pineda MO, Blancas Valencia JM (2018) Zenker’s diverticulum: submucosal tunneling endoscopic septum division (Z-POEM). Dig Endosc 30:124–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12958
doi: 10.1111/den.12958 pubmed: 28875504
Cai M, Xu M, Li Q, Chen W, Zhu Y, Zhang D, Yao L, Zhou P (2017) Preliminary results of submucosal tunneling endoscopic septum division in the treatment of esophageal diverticulum. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 20:530–534
pubmed: 28534330
Gutierrez OIB, Moran R, Yang J, Sanaei O, Kalloo AN, Kumbhari V, Khashab MA (2018) Successful single-session cricopharyngeal and Zenker’s diverticulum peroral endoscopic myotomy. Endoscopy 50:E220–E221. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0624-1977
doi: 10.1055/a-0624-1977
Hajifathalian K, Dawod Q, Saumoy M, Kahaleh M (2018) Submucosal tunneling endoscopic septum division for treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum. Endoscopy 50:E340–E341. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0665-4173
doi: 10.1055/a-0665-4173 pubmed: 30261532
Yang J, Novak S, Ujiki M, Hernández Ó, Desai P, Benias P, Lee D, Chang K, Bertrand B, Barret M, Kumta N, Zeng X, Hu B, Delis K, Khashab MA (2019) An international study on the use of peroral endoscopic myotomy in the management of Zenker’s diverticulum. Gastrointest Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.249
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.249 pubmed: 31839408 pmcid: 6715456
Maydeo A, Patil GK, Dalal A (2019) Operative technical tricks and 12-month outcomes of diverticular peroral endoscopic myotomy (D-POEM) in patients with symptomatic esophageal diverticula. Endoscopy 51:1136–1140. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1015-0214
doi: 10.1055/a-1015-0214 pubmed: 31614371
Jain D, Sharma A, Shah M, Patel U, Thosani N, Singhal S (2018) Efficacy and safety of flexible endoscopic management of Zenker’s diverticulum. J Clin Gastroenterol 52:369–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000000977
doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000977 pubmed: 29283905
Ishaq S, Hassan C, Antonello A, Tanner K, Bellisario C, Battaglia G, Anderloni A, Correale L, Sharma P, Baron TH, Repici A (2016) Flexible endoscopic treatment for Zenker’s diverticulum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 83:1076–1089.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.039
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.039 pubmed: 26802196
Brewer Gutierrez OI, Ichkhanian Y, Spadaccini M, Vosoughi K, Repici A, Khashab MA (2019) Zenker’s diverticulum per-oral endoscopic myotomy techniques: changing paradigms. Gastroenterology 156:2134–2135. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.02.045
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.02.045 pubmed: 30851303
Mavrogenis G, Tsevgas I, Zachariadis D, Bazerbachi F (2020) Mucosotomy at the top of the septum facilitates tunneling and clipping during peroral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker’s diverticulum (Z-POEM). Ann Gastroenterol 33:101
pubmed: 31892806
Crawley B, Dehom S, Tamares S, Marghalani A, Ongkasuwan J, Reder L, Ivey C, Amin M, Fritz M, Pitman M, Tulunay-Ugur O, Weissbrod P (2019) Adverse events after rigid and flexible endoscopic repair of Zenker’s diverticula: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 161:388–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599819839991
doi: 10.1177/0194599819839991 pubmed: 31010403
Patel BJ, Mathur AK, Dehom S, Jackson CS (2014) Savary dilation is a safe and effective long-term means of treatment of symptomatic cricopharyngeal bar: a single-center experience. J Clin Gastroenterol 48:500–504. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000000026
doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000026 pubmed: 24231933
Wang AY, Kadkade R, Kahrilas PJ, Hirano I (2005) Effectiveness of esophageal dilation for symptomatic cricopharyngeal bar. Gastrointest Endosc 61:148–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02447-2
doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02447-2 pubmed: 15672078

Auteurs

Michael J Klingler (MJ)

Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave Mail Code H18, Cleveland, OH, 44195-0001, USA. Klinglm@ccf.org.

Joshua P Landreneau (JP)

Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave Mail Code H18, Cleveland, OH, 44195-0001, USA.

Andrew T Strong (AT)

Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave Mail Code H18, Cleveland, OH, 44195-0001, USA.

Juan S Barajas-Gamboa (JS)

Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Christine Tat (C)

Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Chao Tu (C)

Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave Mail Code H18, Cleveland, OH, 44195-0001, USA.

Alisan Fathalizadeh (A)

Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave Mail Code H18, Cleveland, OH, 44195-0001, USA.

Matthew Kroh (M)

Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave Mail Code H18, Cleveland, OH, 44195-0001, USA.
Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

John Rodriguez (J)

Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave Mail Code H18, Cleveland, OH, 44195-0001, USA.

Madhusudhan R Sanaka (MR)

Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave Mail Code H18, Cleveland, OH, 44195-0001, USA.

Jeffrey Ponsky (J)

Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave Mail Code H18, Cleveland, OH, 44195-0001, USA.
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH