Efficacy and safety of one-month DAPT followed by 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy in patients undergoing proximal LAD stenting: Insights from the GLOBAL LEADERS trial.
Drug-eluting stent
Dual antiplatelet therapy
Proximal left anterior artery descending artery
Ticagrelor monotherapy
Journal
International journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1874-1754
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8200291
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Dec 2020
01 Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
28
07
2020
accepted:
29
07
2020
pubmed:
5
8
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
5
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Data on optimal antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing stenting of the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) are limited. This is a post-hoc analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS trial, a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled trial, comparing the experimental strategy (1-month dual anti-platelet therapy [DAPT] followed by 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy) with the reference regimen (12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin monotherapy) in relation to stenting of the proximal LAD. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death or new Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) and key secondary safety endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding at two years. Among 15,845 patients included in the analysis, 3823 (23.9%) patients underwent stenting of the proximal LAD, while 12,022 (75.2%) did not. In the proximal LAD stenting group, there was no significant difference in the risk of the primary endpoint between the two antiplatelet strategies (3.38% vs. 3.93%; hazard ratio [HR]:0.86; 95% CI:0.62-1.20; P The present study showed patients having stenting to the proximal LAD could potentially benefit from the experimental strategy with lower ischaemic events without a trade-off in major bleeding at two years.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUNDS
BACKGROUND
Data on optimal antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing stenting of the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) are limited.
METHODS
METHODS
This is a post-hoc analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS trial, a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled trial, comparing the experimental strategy (1-month dual anti-platelet therapy [DAPT] followed by 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy) with the reference regimen (12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin monotherapy) in relation to stenting of the proximal LAD. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death or new Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) and key secondary safety endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding at two years.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among 15,845 patients included in the analysis, 3823 (23.9%) patients underwent stenting of the proximal LAD, while 12,022 (75.2%) did not. In the proximal LAD stenting group, there was no significant difference in the risk of the primary endpoint between the two antiplatelet strategies (3.38% vs. 3.93%; hazard ratio [HR]:0.86; 95% CI:0.62-1.20; P
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The present study showed patients having stenting to the proximal LAD could potentially benefit from the experimental strategy with lower ischaemic events without a trade-off in major bleeding at two years.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32750393
pii: S0167-5273(20)33527-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.07.042
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
0
Ticagrelor
GLH0314RVC
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
27-34Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Hara reports grant from Japanese Circulation Society and Fukuda Foundation for Medical Technology, outside the submitted work; Dr. de Winter reports unrestricted educational research grant from Astra Zeneca for Acadamic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands, outside the submitted work; Dr. Hamm reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work; Dr. Steg reports grants and personal fees from Bayer/Janssen, grants and personal fees from Merck, grants and personal fees from Sanofi, grants and personal fees from Amarin, personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Regeneron, personal fees from Lilly, personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from Servier, outside the submitted work; Dr. Windecker reports research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, BMS, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Johnson& Johnson, Medtronic, Querbet, Polares, Sanofi, Terumo, Sinomed, outside the submitted work. He serves as unpaid member of the steering/excecutive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, BMS, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardiovalve, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Polares, Sinomed, V-Wave and Xeltis, but has not received personal payments by any pharmaceutical company or device manufacturer. He is also member of the steering/excecutive committee group of several investigated-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr. Vranckx reports personal fees from Astra Zeneca, personal fees from The Medicines Company, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Bayer Health Care, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, personal fees from Terumo, personal fees from CLS Bhering, outside the submitted work; Dr. Valgimigli reports grants and personal fees from Abbott, personal fees from Chiesi, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, personal fees from Amgen, grants and personal fees from Terumo, personal fees from Alvimedica, grants from Medicure, grants and personal fees from Astrazeneca, personal fees from Biosensors, personal fees from Idorsia, outside the submitted work; Dr. Serruys reports personal fees from Abbott Laboratories, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Biotrinik, personal fees from GLG Research, personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from Sino Medical Sciences Technology, personal fees from Société Europa Digital Publishing, personal fees from Stentys France, personal fees from Svelte Medical Systems, personal fees from Philips/Volcano, personal fees from Qualimed, personal fees from Xeltis, outside the submitted work; All other authors declare no competing interests.