Monitoring soil radon during the 2016-2017 central Italy sequence in light of seismicity.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 08 2020
04 08 2020
Historique:
received:
14
05
2020
accepted:
20
07
2020
entrez:
6
8
2020
pubmed:
6
8
2020
medline:
6
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The radioactive nature of radon makes it a powerful tracer for fluid movements in the crust, and a potentially effective marker to study processes connected with earthquakes preparatory phase. To explore the feasibility of using soil radon variations as earthquakes precursor, we analyse the radon concentration data recorded by two stations located close to the epicentre of the strongest mainshock (Mw 6.5 on October 30, 2016) of the seismic sequence which affected central Italy from August 2016. The two stations CTTR and NRCA operate in the framework of the permanent Italian Radon monitoring Network and recorded almost continuously since 2012 and 2016, respectively, the latter being installed just after the first mainshock of the sequence (Mw 6.0 on August 24, 2016). An increase of radon emanation is clearly visible about 2 weeks before the Mw 6.5 event on both the time series, more pronounced on NRCA, nearer to the epicentre, suggesting the possibility of a direct association with the earthquake occurrence. An independently developed detection algorithm aimed at highlighting the connections between radon emission variations and major earthquakes occurrence succeeds in forecasting the Mw 6.5 mainshock on NRCA time series. The resulting time advance of the alarm is consistent with that obtained using a Bayesian approach to compute the a posteriori probability of multiple change points on the radon time series of NRCA. Moreover, it is in agreement with the delay time which maximizes the correlation between radon and seismic anomalies. Applying the detection algorithm to CTTR time series returns alarms for both the Mw 6.0 event, with epicentre closer to this station, and the stronger Mw 6.5 event, but with a higher number of false detections. Finally, we found that a preliminary correction of the bias introduced by variations of meteorological parameters does not affect our main finding of an increase in radon concentration before the major mainshocks. Our study confirms that, although much work is still needed, a monitoring approach based on a permanent dense network is crucial for making radon time series analysis an effective complement to traditional seismological tools.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32753703
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69821-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-69821-2
pmc: PMC7403152
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13137Références
ISIDe Working Group. Italian Seismological Instrumental and Parametric Database (ISIDe) (Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, 2007).
D’Agostino, N. et al. Contemporary crustal extension in the Umbria–Marche Apennines from regional CGPS networks and comparison between geodetic and seismic deformation. Tectonophysics 476(1–2), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2008.09.033 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2008.09.033
Doglioni, C., Pondrelli, S., Anzidei, M. & Florindo, F. The Amatrice seismic sequence: preliminary data and results. Ann. Geophys. 59, 5. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7373 (2016).
doi: 10.4401/ag-7373
Cannelli, V., Piersanti, A., Galli, G. & Melini, D. Italian radon monitoring network (IRON): a permanent network for near real-time monitoring of soil radon emission in Italy. Ann. Geophys. 61, 444 (2018).
doi: 10.4401/ag-7604
Cannelli, V., Piersanti, A., Spagnuolo, E. & Galli, G. Preliminary analysis of radon time series before the Ml=6 Amatrice earthquake: possible implications for fluid migration. Ann. Geophys. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7166 (2016).
doi: 10.4401/ag-7166
Barbosa, S. M., Donner, R. V. & Steinitz, G. Radon applications in geosciences—Progress & perspectives. Eur. Phys. J. Special Top. 224, 597–603. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2015-02393-y (2015).
doi: 10.1140/epjst/e2015-02393-y
Semkow, T. M., Parekh, P. P., Schwenker, C. D., Dansereau, R. & Webber, J. S. Efficiency of the Lucas scintillation cell. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 353, 515–518 (1994).
doi: 10.1016/0168-9002(94)91712-4
Abbady, A. G. E. & Rolf, M. Indoor radon measurement with the Lucas cell technique. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 61(6), 1469–1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.03.065 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.03.065
Tuccimei, P., Mollo, S., Vinciguerra, S., Castelluccio, M. & Soligo, M. Radon and thoron emission from lithophysae-rich tuff under increasing deformation: An experimental study. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, 5. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL042134 (2010).
doi: 10.1029/2009GL042134
Mollo, S., Tuccimei, P. & Heap, M. J. Increase in radon emission due to rock failure: An experimental study. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L14304. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047962 (2011).
doi: 10.1029/2011GL047962
Tuccimei, P., Mollo, S., Soligo, M., Scarlato, P. & Castelluccio, M. Real-time setup to measure radon emission during rock deformation: implications for geochemical surveillance. Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst. Discuss. 5, 39–62. https://doi.org/10.5194/gid-5-39-2015 (2015).
doi: 10.5194/gid-5-39-2015
Klusman, R. W. & Webster, J. D. Meteorological noise in crustal gas emission and relevance to geochemical exploration. J. Geochem. Explor. 15, 63–76 (1981).
doi: 10.1016/0375-6742(81)90056-X
Inan, S. et al. Seasonal variations in soil radon emanation: long-term continuous monitoring in light of seismicity. Nat Hazards 62, 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0096-6 (2012).
doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0096-6
Piersanti, A., Cannelli, V. & Galli, G. The Pollino 2012 seismic sequence: clues from continuous radon monitoring. Solid Earth 7, 1303–1316. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-7-1303-2016 (2016).
doi: 10.5194/se-7-1303-2016
Lucas, H. F. Improved Low-Level Alpha-Scintillation Counter for Radon. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 28(9), 680–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2003.08.011 (1957).
doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2003.08.011
Waskom, M. et al. mwaskom/seaborn: seaborn v0.81. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.883859 (2017).
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.883859
Iskandar, D., Yamazawa, H. & Iida, T. Quantification of the dependency of radon emanation power on soil temperature. Appl. Radiat.. Isot 60, 971–973 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.02.003
Jaishi, H. P., Singh, S., Tiwari, R. P. & Tiwari, R. C. Correlation of radon anomalies with seismic events along Mat fault in Serchhip District, Mizoram, India. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 22, 040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.12.040 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.12.040
Zafrir, H., Barbosa, S. M. & Malik, U. Differentiation between the effect of temperature and pressure on radon within the subsurface geological media. Radiat. Meas. 49, 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2012.11.019 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2012.11.019
Piersanti, A., Cannelli, V. & Galli, G. Long term continuous radon monitoring in a seismically active area. Ann. Geophys. 58, S0437. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-6735 (2015).
doi: 10.4401/ag-6735
Kraner, H. W., Schroeder, G. L. & Evans R. D. Measurements of the effects of atmospheric vari- ables on radon-222 flux and soil gas concentration. In The Natural Radiation and Environment, Symposium Proceedings (Houston, Texas, April 10–13, 1963) 191–215 (Lower, Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1964).
Singh, M., Ramola, R. C., Singh, S. & Virk, H. S. Influence of meteorological parameters on soil gas radon. J. As- soc. Explor. Geophys. 9, 85–90 (1988).
Zmazek, B., Todorovski, L., Dmeroski, S., Vaupotic, J. & Kobal, I. Application of decision trees to the analysis of soil radon data for earthquake prediction. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 58, 697–706 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/S0969-8043(03)00094-0
Cigolini, C. et al. Radon surveys and real-time monitoring at Stromboli volcano: Influence of soil temperature, atmospheric pressure and tidal forces on 222Rn degassing. J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res. 184(3–4), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2009.04.019 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2009.04.019
Kumar, A. et al. Identifications and removal of diurnal and semidiurnal variations in radon time series data of Hsinhua monitoring station in SW Taiwan using singular spectrum analysis. Nat. Hazards 79, 317–330 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s11069-015-1844-1
Siino, M. et al. Multiple seasonality in soil radon time series. Sci Rep 9, 8610. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44875-z (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44875-z
pubmed: 31197185
pmcid: 6565803
Ruggieri, E. A Bayesian approach to detecting change points in climatic records. Int. J. Climatol 33, 520–528 (2013).
doi: 10.1002/joc.3447
Kanamori, H. The energy release in great earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res. 82(20), 2981–2987. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb082i020p02981 (1977).
doi: 10.1029/jb082i020p02981
Hunter, J. D. Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9(3), 90–95 (2007).
doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
Wessel, P. & Smith, W. New, improved version of the generic mapping tools released. EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 79, 579–579 (1998).
doi: 10.1029/98EO00426