Survey of the Impact of COVID-19 on Oncologists' Decision Making in Cancer.
Adult
Aged
Betacoronavirus
/ pathogenicity
COVID-19
Clinical Decision-Making
Coronavirus Infections
/ epidemiology
Female
Humans
Infection Control
/ methods
Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional
/ prevention & control
Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient
/ prevention & control
Male
Medical Oncology
/ methods
Middle Aged
Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Oncologists
/ statistics & numerical data
Pandemics
/ prevention & control
Personal Protective Equipment
/ standards
Pneumonia, Viral
/ epidemiology
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
/ standards
SARS-CoV-2
Surveys and Questionnaires
/ statistics & numerical data
Telemedicine
/ statistics & numerical data
Journal
JCO global oncology
ISSN: 2687-8941
Titre abrégé: JCO Glob Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101760170
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
entrez:
7
8
2020
pubmed:
7
8
2020
medline:
19
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To understand readiness measures taken by oncologists to protect patients and health care workers from the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and how their clinical decision making was influenced by the pandemic. An online survey was conducted between March 24 and April 29, 2020. A total of 343 oncologists from 28 countries participated. The median age was 43 years (range, 29-68 years), and the majority were male (62%). At the time of the survey, nearly all participants self-reported an outbreak in their country (99.7%). Personal protective equipment was available to all participants, of which surgical mask was the most common (n = 308; 90%). Telemedicine, in the form of phone or video encounters, was common and implemented by 80% (n = 273). Testing patients with cancer for COVID-19 via reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction before systemic treatment was not routinely implemented: 58% reported no routine testing, 39% performed testing in selected patients, and 3% performed systematic testing in all patients. The most significant factors influencing an oncologist's decision making regarding choice of systemic therapy included patient age and comorbidities (81% and 92%, respectively). Although hormonal treatments and tyrosine kinase inhibitors were considered to be relatively safe, cytotoxic chemotherapy and immune therapies were perceived as being less safe or unsafe by participants. The vast majority of participants stated that during the pandemic they would use less chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and steroids. Although treatment in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and first-line metastatic disease was less affected, most of the participants stated that they would be more hesitant to recommend second- or third-line therapies in metastatic disease. Decision making by oncologists has been significantly influenced by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32755479
doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00300
pmc: PMC7456315
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1248-1257Références
Cancer Discov. 2020 Jun;10(6):783-791
pubmed: 32345594
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2005-2006
pubmed: 32282023
J Infect Dis. 2022 May 4;225(9):1561-1568
pubmed: 32301491
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jul 1;6(7):1108-1110
pubmed: 32211820
Science. 2020 May 1;368(6490):489-493
pubmed: 32179701
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 4;382(23):e82
pubmed: 32240581
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1679-1681
pubmed: 32160451
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Mar;21(3):335-337
pubmed: 32066541
Eur Urol. 2020 Jul;78(1):e27-e35
pubmed: 32345523
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):970-971
pubmed: 32003551
Eur Urol. 2020 Jul;78(1):124-126
pubmed: 32349934
Ann Oncol. 2020 Jul;31(7):894-901
pubmed: 32224151
Lancet Haematol. 2020 Jun;7(6):e432-e435
pubmed: 32339482
Lancet Oncol. 2020 May;21(5):634-636
pubmed: 32359487
JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1061-1069
pubmed: 32031570
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul 1;38(19):2201-2205
pubmed: 32343643
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720
pubmed: 32109013
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Oct 01;2(10):1346-1353
pubmed: 27367787
J Med Virol. 2020 Oct;92(10):1755-1756
pubmed: 32270882
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2052-2059
pubmed: 32320003
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 7;382(19):1858-1859
pubmed: 32251568
Eur Urol. 2020 Jun;77(6):663-666
pubmed: 32279903
Eur Urol. 2020 Jun;77(6):667-668
pubmed: 32312544
Ann Oncol. 2020 Aug;31(8):1040-1045
pubmed: 32387456
Lancet Oncol. 2020 May;21(5):619-621
pubmed: 32220659
Cancer Discov. 2020 Jul;10(7):935-941
pubmed: 32357994
Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):665-671
pubmed: 32405058
Eur Urol. 2020 Jul;78(1):29-42
pubmed: 32414626
Cancer Discov. 2020 Aug;10(8):1121-1128
pubmed: 32398243
Immunotherapy. 2020 Apr;12(5):269-273
pubmed: 32212881
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506
pubmed: 31986264
JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Apr;6:557-559
pubmed: 32250659
Natl Sci Rev. 2020 Jun;7(6):998-1002
pubmed: 34676125
Nat Cancer. 2020;1(5):473-476
pubmed: 32346676
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e205619
pubmed: 32275319
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jun;21(6):748-750
pubmed: 32359404
Eur Urol. 2020 Jul;78(1):21-28
pubmed: 32376137
Ann Oncol. 2020 Aug;31(8):1088-1089
pubmed: 32330541
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jun;21(6):750-751
pubmed: 32359403
Cancer Cell. 2020 Jun 8;37(6):738-741
pubmed: 32454025
Oncologist. 2020 Jun;25(6):463-467
pubmed: 32298029