From Smoking-Permitted to Smokefree Prisons: A 3-Year Evaluation of the Changes in Occupational Exposure to Second-Hand Smoke Across a National Prison System.
PM2.5
TIPs
Tobacco in Prisons study
prisons
second-hand smoke exposure
smokefree policy
smoking
workplace
Journal
Annals of work exposures and health
ISSN: 2398-7316
Titre abrégé: Ann Work Expo Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101698454
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 11 2020
16 11 2020
Historique:
received:
27
03
2020
revised:
11
06
2020
accepted:
23
06
2020
pubmed:
7
8
2020
medline:
29
1
2021
entrez:
7
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prisons in Scotland were one of the few workplaces exempt from the 2006 comprehensive smoking ban in indoor public places, excluding the prison workforce from the health benefits of smokefree workplaces. The November 2018 introduction of comprehensive restrictions on smoking in Scottish prisons aimed to protect prison staff and people in custody from the harmful impacts of second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure. This study presents SHS exposure data gathered after smokefree policy implementation and compares these with data gathered during and before policy development. Dylos DC1700 monitors were used to measure concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) derived from SHS across Scotland's 15 prisons. Six days of fixed-site monitoring (09.00 22 May 2019 to 09.00 28 May 2019) were conducted in residential halls in each prison 6 months post-smokefree policy implementation. Prison staff task-based measurements were conducted to assess concentrations of SHS in various locations (e.g. gyms and workshops) and during specific activities (e.g. cell searches, maintenance, and meal service). Utilizing the fixed-site monitoring data, typical daily PM2.5 exposure profiles were constructed for the prison service and time-weighted average (TWA) exposure concentrations were estimated for the typical shift patterns of residential staff pre- and post-smokefree policy implementation. Staff perceptions of changes to SHS exposure were assessed using online surveys. Analysis of both fixed-site and mobile task-based PM2.5 measurements showed the smokefree policy implementation was successful in reducing SHS exposures across the Scottish prison estate. Measured PM2.5 in residential halls declined markedly; median fixed-site concentrations reduced by more than 91% compared with measures in 2016 before policy announcement. The changes in the TWA concentrations across shifts (over 90% decrease across all shifts) and task-based measurements (89% average decrease for high-exposure tasks) provide evidence that prison staff exposure to SHS has significantly reduced. Following smokefree policy implementation, the majority of staff reported no longer being exposed to SHS at work. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive international study to objectively measure SHS levels before, during, and after implementation of a smokefree policy across a country's prison system. The findings confirm that such a policy change can be successfully implemented to eliminate occupational exposures to SHS. The results are highly relevant for other jurisdictions considering changes to prison smoking legislation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32756912
pii: 5881272
doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa073
pmc: PMC7668237
doi:
Substances chimiques
Tobacco Smoke Pollution
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
959-969Subventions
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : SPHSU12
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : SPHSU14
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_13027
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12017/14
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12017/12
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00022/2
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 15/55/44
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : SPHSU17
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.
Références
Environ Res. 2020 Mar;182:108963
pubmed: 31837549
Tob Control. 2008 Apr;17(2):123-7
pubmed: 18285386
Occup Environ Med. 2009 May;66(5):339-46
pubmed: 19208693
Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24(2):153-8
pubmed: 24046213
Tob Control. 2020 Jun 25;:
pubmed: 32587111
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Oct;16(10):1365-70
pubmed: 24904023
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Jul 17;21(8):1027-1035
pubmed: 29767777
Tob Control. 2012 Sep;21(5):488-91
pubmed: 21836161
Ann Work Expo Health. 2017 Aug 1;61(7):809-821
pubmed: 28810685
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 31;359(5):482-91
pubmed: 18669427
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Feb;15(2):343-7
pubmed: 22589420
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 May 24;:
pubmed: 32447381
Lung Cancer. 1996 Mar;14 Suppl 1:S195-213
pubmed: 8785663
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 14;9(6):e025782
pubmed: 31201185
Eur Respir J. 1997 Oct;10(10):2384-97
pubmed: 9387970
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2005 Apr-Jun;11(2):185-98
pubmed: 15875895
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Sep;36(3):352-81
pubmed: 23975760
Tob Induc Dis. 2019 Jun 04;17:47
pubmed: 31516490
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 25;9(6):e027799
pubmed: 31243033
Tob Control. 2020 Mar;29(2):234-236
pubmed: 31064866
N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1139-45
pubmed: 20843248
Tob Control. 2007 Apr;16(2):127-32
pubmed: 17400951