Dynamic changes impact the plum pox virus population structure during leaf and bud development.
Phloem
Population dynamics
Tissue specificity
Vernalization
Journal
Virology
ISSN: 1096-0341
Titre abrégé: Virology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0110674
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
received:
20
05
2020
revised:
21
06
2020
accepted:
22
06
2020
pubmed:
8
8
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
entrez:
8
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Plum pox virus (PPV) is a worldwide threat to stone fruit production. Its woody perennial hosts provide a dynamic environment for virus evolution over multiple growing seasons. To investigate the impact seasonal host development plays in PPV population structure, next generation sequencing of ribosome associated viral genomes, termed translatome, was used to assess PPV variants derived from phloem or whole leaf tissues over a range of plum leaf and bud developmental stages. Results show that translatome PPV variants occur at proportionately higher levels in bud and newly developing leaf tissues that have low infection levels while more mature tissues with high infection levels display proportionately lower numbers of viral variants. Additional variant analysis identified distinct groups based on population frequency as well as sets of phloem and whole tissue specific variants. Combined, these results indicate PPV population dynamics are impacted by the tissue type and developmental stage of their host.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32758716
pii: S0042-6822(20)30126-4
doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2020.06.014
pmc: PMC7513809
mid: NIHMS1618848
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
192-199Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : T32 AI051967
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : T32 AI125186
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Mol Plant Pathol. 2012 Oct;13(8):877-86
pubmed: 22458641
J Virol. 2012 May;86(10):5554-61
pubmed: 22398285
Phytopathology. 2016 Apr;106(4):407-16
pubmed: 26667187
J Virol. 2016 Sep 29;90(20):8950-3
pubmed: 27440878
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2013 Oct;26(10):1211-24
pubmed: 23745677
Phytopathology. 2011 May;101(5):627-36
pubmed: 21261466
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24627
pubmed: 21931783
Plant Physiol. 2001 May;126(1):109-21
pubmed: 11351075
Virology. 2017 Oct;510:76-89
pubmed: 28710959
J Virol Methods. 2004 Sep 1;120(1):97-105
pubmed: 15234814
J Sci Food Agric. 2017 May;97(7):2154-2158
pubmed: 27614092
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2020 Jan;33(1):66-77
pubmed: 31347973
Genetics. 2018 Dec;210(4):1151-1162
pubmed: 30523166
Viruses. 2012 Nov 07;4(11):2853-901
pubmed: 23202508
J Gen Virol. 2019 Oct;100(10):1457-1468
pubmed: 31418674
Plant Cell Rep. 2004 Oct;23(4):224-30
pubmed: 15235813
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 19;8(1):10950
pubmed: 30026539
Hortic Res. 2019 Feb 1;6:16
pubmed: 30729006
Nat Rev Genet. 2008 Apr;9(4):267-76
pubmed: 18319742
PLoS Pathog. 2017 Mar 7;13(3):e1006253
pubmed: 28267773
Acta Virol. 2008;52(2):75-89
pubmed: 18564894
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2001;39:157-86
pubmed: 11701863
J Virol. 2006 Mar;80(5):2349-57
pubmed: 16474141
Mol Plant Pathol. 2014 Apr;15(3):226-41
pubmed: 24102673
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Nov 12;10:1439
pubmed: 31798606
Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1284:185-207
pubmed: 25757773
Virus Res. 2018 Jan 15;244:36-52
pubmed: 29103997
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 3;106(44):18843-8
pubmed: 19843695
Virus Res. 2012 Jul;167(1):112-7
pubmed: 22521553
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016 Dec;73(23):4433-4448
pubmed: 27392606
Plant Dis. 2018 Mar;102(3):569-575
pubmed: 30673474