Observational study of the association between diverse licensed premises types and alcohol-related violence in an inner-London borough.


Journal

Journal of epidemiology and community health
ISSN: 1470-2738
Titre abrégé: J Epidemiol Community Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7909766

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2020
Historique:
received: 29 01 2020
revised: 24 04 2020
accepted: 13 07 2020
pubmed: 8 8 2020
medline: 3 9 2021
entrez: 8 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

An ecological correlation has been observed between licensed premises and alcohol-related violence (ARV). In the UK to date, no evidence directly connects alcohol-related harm to a single premises type. Recent policies have called for a diversified alcohol offer, yet quantitative evidence in support remains sparse. This study aims to inform policy by determining whether diversification of the alcohol economy is desirable and to inform the licensing process and submission of public health evidence. Using 11 years of local licensing data from the London Borough of Southwark, alcohol availability over time was approximated by the number of extant alcohol licences, categorised by outlet type: drinking establishments, eateries, takeaways, off-sales and 'other'. Harm was quantified drawing on law enforcement intelligence that recorded ARV. A linked data set was analysed using negative binomial regression, contrasting cumulative impact zones (CIZ)-a common alcohol control policy-with non-CIZ geographies. Each licensed drinking establishment was associated with a 1.6% (95% CI 0.7% to 2.6%; p=0.001) increase in ARV, respectively. 'Other' outlets had a protective effect and were associated with a 1.8% (95% CI 1.0% to 2.5%; p<0.001) decrease in ARV. This study provides direct evidence for an association between alcohol-related harm and licensed premises. The varying associations between outlet type and ARV provide local public health stakeholders with an evidence base upon which to advocate for licensing policies that diversify alcohol availability.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
An ecological correlation has been observed between licensed premises and alcohol-related violence (ARV). In the UK to date, no evidence directly connects alcohol-related harm to a single premises type. Recent policies have called for a diversified alcohol offer, yet quantitative evidence in support remains sparse. This study aims to inform policy by determining whether diversification of the alcohol economy is desirable and to inform the licensing process and submission of public health evidence.
METHODS
Using 11 years of local licensing data from the London Borough of Southwark, alcohol availability over time was approximated by the number of extant alcohol licences, categorised by outlet type: drinking establishments, eateries, takeaways, off-sales and 'other'. Harm was quantified drawing on law enforcement intelligence that recorded ARV. A linked data set was analysed using negative binomial regression, contrasting cumulative impact zones (CIZ)-a common alcohol control policy-with non-CIZ geographies.
RESULTS
Each licensed drinking establishment was associated with a 1.6% (95% CI 0.7% to 2.6%; p=0.001) increase in ARV, respectively. 'Other' outlets had a protective effect and were associated with a 1.8% (95% CI 1.0% to 2.5%; p<0.001) decrease in ARV.
CONCLUSION
This study provides direct evidence for an association between alcohol-related harm and licensed premises. The varying associations between outlet type and ARV provide local public health stakeholders with an evidence base upon which to advocate for licensing policies that diversify alcohol availability.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32759288
pii: jech-2020-213840
doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-213840
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1016-1022

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Talia Boshari (T)

Public Health Directorate, Southwark Council, London, UK talia.boshari@southwark.gov.uk.
Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK.

Carolyn A Sharpe (CA)

Public Health Directorate, Southwark Council, London, UK.
Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK.

Alan J Poots (AJ)

Independent Researcher, Oxford, UK.

Hillary Watt (H)

Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK.

Saifur Rahman (S)

Metropolitan Police Authority, London, UK.

Richard J Pinder (RJ)

Public Health Directorate, Southwark Council, London, UK.
Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH