Effects of Zinc Pollution and Compost Amendment on the Root Microbiome of a Metal Tolerant Poplar Clone.
NGS
bacteria
compost
fungi
metals
microbiome
phytoremediation
Journal
Frontiers in microbiology
ISSN: 1664-302X
Titre abrégé: Front Microbiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101548977
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
25
05
2020
accepted:
26
06
2020
entrez:
8
8
2020
pubmed:
8
8
2020
medline:
8
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Until recently, many phytoremediation studies were focused solely on a plants ability to reclaim heavy metal (HM) polluted soil through a range of different processes, such as phytoextraction and phytostabilization. However, the interaction between plants and their own rhizosphere microbiome represents a new research frontier for phytoremediation. Our hypothesis is that rhizomicrobiome might play a key role in plant wellness and in the response to external stimuli; therefore, this study aimed to shed light the rhizomicrobiome dynamics after an organic amendment (e.g., compost) and/or HM pollution (e.g., Zn), and its relation with plant reclamation ability. To reach this goal we set up a greenhouse experiment cultivating in pot an elite black poplar clone (N12) selected in the past for its excellent ability to reclaim heavy metals. N12 saplings were grown on a soil amended with compost and/or spiked with high Zn doses. At the end of the experiment, we observed that the compost amendment strongly increased the foliar size but did not affect significantly the Zn accumulation in plant. Furthermore, the rhizomicrobiome communities (bacteria and fungi), investigated through NGS, highlighted how α diversity increased in all treatments compared to the untreated N12 saplings. Soil compost amendment, as well as Zn pollution, strongly modified the bacterial rhizomicrobiome structure. Conversely, the variation of the fungal rhizomicrobiome was only marginally affected by soil Zn addition, and only partially impaired by compost. Nevertheless, substantial alterations of the fungal community were due to both compost and Zn. Together, our experimental results revealed that organic amendment increased the bacterial resistance to external stimuli whilst, in the case of fungi, the amendment made the fungi microbiome more susceptible. Finally, the greater microbiome biodiversity does not imply, in this case, a better plant wellness or phytoremediation ability, although the microbiome plays a role in the external stimuli response supporting plant life.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32760392
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01677
pmc: PMC7373765
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1677Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Guarino, Improta, Triassi, Cicatelli and Castiglione.
Références
Science. 2012 Sep 28;337(6102):1661-5
pubmed: 23019650
J Environ Manage. 2016 Mar 15;169:18-26
pubmed: 26716572
Environ Microbiol. 2003 Oct;5(10):896-907
pubmed: 14510843
Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015 May 29;26:27663
pubmed: 26028277
PeerJ. 2018 Mar 7;6:e4478
pubmed: 29568708
Ecology. 2007 Jun;88(6):1354-64
pubmed: 17601128
ISME J. 2012 Sep;6(9):1640-52
pubmed: 22418623
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2008 Mar;27(3):591-8
pubmed: 17944550
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 1;711:134433
pubmed: 31818597
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010 Jan;71(1):94-105
pubmed: 19845764
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 27;9(1):9369
pubmed: 31249317
Mol Plant. 2016 Jun 6;9(6):787-97
pubmed: 27212388
J Environ Manage. 2018 Jun 15;216:41-48
pubmed: 28427880
Gigascience. 2012 Jul 12;1(1):7
pubmed: 23587224
Front Microbiol. 2019 Dec 10;10:2694
pubmed: 31920998
Drug Chem Toxicol. 2010 Jul;33(3):269-78
pubmed: 20429804
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jul 09;10:1506
pubmed: 31338077
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Apr;30(4):772-80
pubmed: 23329690
Nat Methods. 2016 Jul;13(7):581-3
pubmed: 27214047
Sci Total Environ. 2003 May 20;307(1-3):167-78
pubmed: 12711432
Environ Pollut. 2001;112(1):89-97
pubmed: 11202657
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013 Sep;37(5):634-63
pubmed: 23790204
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 13;9(1):1947
pubmed: 30760787
Biotechnol Adv. 2012 Nov-Dec;30(6):1562-74
pubmed: 22580219
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 May;70(5):2966-73
pubmed: 15128558
Nature. 2013 Jul 25;499(7459):431-7
pubmed: 23851394
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Oct;76(20):6751-9
pubmed: 20729324
J Hazard Mater. 2016 Mar 5;304:166-72
pubmed: 26551220
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jul 16;10:1636
pubmed: 31379786
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Apr 15;584-585:329-338
pubmed: 28040210
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Apr 26;10:533
pubmed: 31105729
Front Microbiol. 2016 May 24;7:773
pubmed: 27252690
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 26;6:36302
pubmed: 27782202
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2015 Jan;91(1):1-11
pubmed: 25764529
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018 Jan;147:1035-1045
pubmed: 29976006
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59497
pubmed: 23527207
Environ Pollut. 2009 Jul;157(7):2108-17
pubmed: 19285369
J Hazard Mater. 2014 Feb 15;266:141-66
pubmed: 24394669
Plant Cell Rep. 2020 Jan;39(1):3-17
pubmed: 31346716
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015 Mar;99(6):2911-22
pubmed: 25408313
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018 Nov 30;164:520-529
pubmed: 30149350
Chemosphere. 2009 May;75(6):781-7
pubmed: 19187949
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2013 Jan;19(1):11-20
pubmed: 24381434
Genome Biol. 2011 Jun 24;12(6):R60
pubmed: 21702898
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Sep;79(17):5094-103
pubmed: 23793627
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Dec;71(12):8228-35
pubmed: 16332807
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 1;711:135067
pubmed: 31818595
J Hazard Mater. 2011 Apr 15;188(1-3):98-104
pubmed: 21316851
New Phytol. 2007;173(4):677-702
pubmed: 17286818
Bioinformatics. 2016 Apr 1;32(7):1001-8
pubmed: 26319390
ISME J. 2015 May;9(5):1177-94
pubmed: 25350160
J Environ Manage. 2014 Dec 15;146:94-99
pubmed: 25163599
mSystems. 2018 Nov 20;3(6):
pubmed: 30505944
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012 Oct;82(1):169-81
pubmed: 22587649
New Phytol. 2015 Mar;205(4):1406-23
pubmed: 25639293
Front Microbiol. 2017 Dec 21;8:2593
pubmed: 29312265
Trends Microbiol. 2013 Dec;21(12):641-51
pubmed: 24139848
mBio. 2013 Oct 22;4(5):e00708-13
pubmed: 24149512
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2013 Sep;32(9):1992-2002
pubmed: 23637098
Water Air Soil Pollut. 2017;228(9):349
pubmed: 28890580
Environ Pollut. 2005 Feb;133(3):541-51
pubmed: 15519729
Waste Manag. 2008;28(2):347-58
pubmed: 17320368