Navigating the crisis landscape: engaging the ministry of health and United Nations agencies to make abortion care available to Rohingya refugees.
Abortion
Bangladesh
Menstrual regulation
Refugees
Rohingya
Sexual violence
Unintended pregnancy
Journal
Conflict and health
ISSN: 1752-1505
Titre abrégé: Confl Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101286573
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
27
01
2020
accepted:
17
07
2020
entrez:
8
8
2020
pubmed:
8
8
2020
medline:
8
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Unintended and unwanted pregnancies likely increase during displacement, making the need for sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services, especially safe abortion, even greater. Attention is growing around barriers to safe abortion care for displaced women as donor, non-governmental and civil society actors become more convinced of this need and reports of systematic sexual violence against women are more widely documented around the world. Yet a reluctance to truly change practice remains tied to some commonly reported reasons: 1) There is no need; 2) Abortion is illegal in the setting; 3) Donors do not fund abortion services, and; 4) Abortion is too complicated during acute emergencies. While there is global progress towards acknowledging the deficit of attention and evidence on abortion services in humanitarian settings, improvements in actual services have yet to follow. In August 2017, over 700,000 Rohingya refugees fled Myanmar for Bangladesh. Women and girls fled homes and communities - many experienced terrible violence - and arrived at camps in Bangladesh with SRH needs, including unwanted pregnancies. With funding from UNFPA and others, Ipas trained providers and established safe induced abortion (called menstrual regulation (MR) in Bangladesh) and contraception services in October 2017.Ipas Bangladesh initiated the trainings in coordination with the government's health system and international aid agencies. Training approaches were modified so that providers could be trained quickly with minimal disruption to their ability to provide care. Within one month of the arrival of refugees, MR services had been established in eight facilities, for the first time during an acute emergency. By mid-2019, over 300 health workers from 37 health facilities had attended training in MR, postabortion care (PAC), and contraception. Over 8000 Rohingya refugees have received abortion-related care, more than three-quarters of which were MR procedures; over 26,000 women and girls have received contraception at these facilities. This study demonstrates demand for abortion care exists among refugees. It also illustrates that these needs could have been easily overlooked in the complex environment of competing priorities during an emergency. When safe abortion services were made available, with relative ease and institutional support, women sought assistance, saving them from complications of unsafe abortions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Unintended and unwanted pregnancies likely increase during displacement, making the need for sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services, especially safe abortion, even greater. Attention is growing around barriers to safe abortion care for displaced women as donor, non-governmental and civil society actors become more convinced of this need and reports of systematic sexual violence against women are more widely documented around the world. Yet a reluctance to truly change practice remains tied to some commonly reported reasons: 1) There is no need; 2) Abortion is illegal in the setting; 3) Donors do not fund abortion services, and; 4) Abortion is too complicated during acute emergencies. While there is global progress towards acknowledging the deficit of attention and evidence on abortion services in humanitarian settings, improvements in actual services have yet to follow.
CASE PRESENTATION
METHODS
In August 2017, over 700,000 Rohingya refugees fled Myanmar for Bangladesh. Women and girls fled homes and communities - many experienced terrible violence - and arrived at camps in Bangladesh with SRH needs, including unwanted pregnancies. With funding from UNFPA and others, Ipas trained providers and established safe induced abortion (called menstrual regulation (MR) in Bangladesh) and contraception services in October 2017.Ipas Bangladesh initiated the trainings in coordination with the government's health system and international aid agencies. Training approaches were modified so that providers could be trained quickly with minimal disruption to their ability to provide care. Within one month of the arrival of refugees, MR services had been established in eight facilities, for the first time during an acute emergency. By mid-2019, over 300 health workers from 37 health facilities had attended training in MR, postabortion care (PAC), and contraception. Over 8000 Rohingya refugees have received abortion-related care, more than three-quarters of which were MR procedures; over 26,000 women and girls have received contraception at these facilities.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates demand for abortion care exists among refugees. It also illustrates that these needs could have been easily overlooked in the complex environment of competing priorities during an emergency. When safe abortion services were made available, with relative ease and institutional support, women sought assistance, saving them from complications of unsafe abortions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32760438
doi: 10.1186/s13031-020-00298-6
pii: 298
pmc: PMC7379756
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
50Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
Confl Health. 2016 Sep 21;10:19
pubmed: 27679655
Lancet. 2016 Jul 16;388(10041):258-67
pubmed: 27179755
Confl Health. 2015 Feb 02;9(Suppl 1 Taking Stock of Reproductive Health in Humanitarian):S2
pubmed: 25798188
Reprod Health Matters. 2017 Nov;25(51):40-47
pubmed: 29189110
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Nov;60(5):1172-3
pubmed: 17761735
Confl Health. 2016 Mar 24;10:8
pubmed: 27014367
Confl Health. 2015 Feb 02;9(Suppl 1 Taking Stock of Reproductive Health in Humanitarian):S3
pubmed: 25798189
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;119(2 Pt 1):215-9
pubmed: 22270271
Confl Health. 2018 May 29;12:32
pubmed: 29853989
Reprod Health Matters. 2017 Nov;25(51):18-24
pubmed: 29231788