Where has the quest for conception taken us? Lessons from anthropology and sociology.
anthropology
assisted reproductive technology
in-vitro fertilization
reproduction
reproductive science
sociology
Journal
Reproductive biomedicine & society online
ISSN: 2405-6618
Titre abrégé: Reprod Biomed Soc Online
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101700286
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
04
12
2019
revised:
04
04
2020
accepted:
20
04
2020
entrez:
8
8
2020
pubmed:
8
8
2020
medline:
8
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Louise Brown, the world's first test-tube baby, was born more than 40 years ago in England. For Louise Brown's infertile mother, Lesley, in-vitro fertilization (IVF) was the 'hope technology' which allowed her to overcome her tubal infertility after 9 years of heart-breaking involuntary childlessness. Since then, IVF has travelled to diverse global locations, where millions of individuals and couples have embarked on technologically assisted 'quests for conception'. After 40 years of IVF, where has the quest for conception taken us? This article outlines seven major global trajectories - namely, that the quest for conception has become more: (i) technological, because of a profusion of IVF-based innovations; (ii) masculine, because of men's eager uptake of intracytoplasmic sperm injection, their own 'masculine hope technology'; (iii) stratified, due to persistent race- and class-based barriers in IVF access; (iv) transnational, as infertile and other involuntarily childless people search across borders to overcome restrictions in their home countries; (v) selective, as IVF-based reprogenetic technologies eliminate genetic disease while exacerbating sex selection; (vi) moral, as religious sensibilities both accommodate and curtail the possibilities and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART); and (vii) extended, as new cryopreservation technologies prolong the reproductive lifespan and extend reproduction to the transgender community. The article concludes with thoughts on where future quests for conception might take us, and why IVF and other reproductive technologies are 'good to think with' in both the anthropology and sociology of reproduction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32760816
doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.04.001
pii: S2405-6618(20)30008-3
pmc: PMC7393315
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
46-57Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 209829/Z/17/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Author.
Références
Fertil Steril. 2019 Dec;112(6):973-977
pubmed: 31703942
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Jun;22(7):673-85
pubmed: 21498121
Cult Health Sex. 2015;17(4):470-82
pubmed: 25247927
Hum Reprod. 2017 Mar 1;32(3):575-581
pubmed: 28077428
Fertil Steril. 2010 Jun;94(1):e16-9
pubmed: 20149916
Hum Reprod. 2012 May;27(5):1231-7
pubmed: 22357771
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Jun;40(2):166-173
pubmed: 29648960
Cult Health Sex. 2020 Jun 2;:1-16
pubmed: 32484394
Glob Public Health. 2019 Dec;14(12):1669-1688
pubmed: 31204900
Hum Reprod. 2004 Dec;19(12):2689-94
pubmed: 15513984
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jun;22(4):440-9
pubmed: 27006004
J Fam Issues. 2018 Dec;39(18):4179-4203
pubmed: 30568320
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Jan;35(1):49-59
pubmed: 29124460
Sociol Health Illn. 2018 Jun;40(5):859-873
pubmed: 29602235
Med Anthropol. 2019 May-Jun;38(4):356-369
pubmed: 30726679
Cult Health Sex. 2018 Sep;20(9):992-1005
pubmed: 29185876
Med Anthropol Q. 2004 Jun;18(2):162-82
pubmed: 15272802
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2016 Dec;23(6):458-464
pubmed: 27672732
Fertil Steril. 2018 Jun;109(6):1097-1104.e1
pubmed: 29807657
Med Anthropol. 2019 Oct;38(7):603-619
pubmed: 30942608
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Apr;203:19-27
pubmed: 29533877
Hum Reprod Update. 2015 Jul-Aug;21(4):411-26
pubmed: 25801630
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;30(4):423-5
pubmed: 17094030
Med Anthropol. 2019 May-Jun;38(4):370-383
pubmed: 30806079
New Genet Soc. 2018 Dec 02;37(4):338-361
pubmed: 30679931
J Med Ethics. 2005 May;31(5):286-8
pubmed: 15863688
Bioethics. 2001 Oct;15(5-6):413-26
pubmed: 12058767
Hum Reprod. 2015 Feb;30(2):338-44
pubmed: 25432922
Hum Reprod. 2012 Jan;27(1):9-13
pubmed: 22082981
Fertil Steril. 2011 Jun 30;95(8):2628-30
pubmed: 21704214
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Jun;36(6):1069-1080
pubmed: 31119440
Int J Health Serv. 2003;33(2):235-52
pubmed: 12800886
Med Anthropol Q. 2019 Sep;33(3):345-363
pubmed: 30734971
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Dec;195:25-33
pubmed: 29121511
Fertil Steril. 2013 Nov;100(5):1343-9
pubmed: 23953326
J Med Ethics. 2002 Dec;28(6):337-41
pubmed: 12468650
Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Dec;21(7):848-53
pubmed: 21050814
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2012 Sep;30(2):29-48
pubmed: 23409535
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Dec 19;7:47-54
pubmed: 30723815
Bioethics. 2009 Jan;23(1):47-58
pubmed: 19076941
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Mar;36(3):579-588
pubmed: 30604136
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018 Jul 23;16(1):70
pubmed: 30037349
Fertil Steril. 2016 Mar;105(3):786-790
pubmed: 26690009
Hum Reprod. 2010 Jun;25(6):1361-8
pubmed: 20348165
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Nov;23(5):535-7
pubmed: 21962528
Hum Reprod. 2013 Nov;28(11):3103-10
pubmed: 23943796
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Sep;23(3):334-40
pubmed: 21775211
Hum Reprod. 2013 Feb;28(2):462-70
pubmed: 23213178
Med Hist. 2019 Apr;63(2):189-208
pubmed: 30912501
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2015 Jun;1(1):9-18
pubmed: 28299361
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Nov;23(5):609-17
pubmed: 21975224
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2016 Jun 14;2:16-23
pubmed: 29892712
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Aug;31(2):239-45
pubmed: 26099440
J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2017 Apr;35(2):108-118
pubmed: 29517357
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2010 Jul;22(3 Suppl):68S-74S
pubmed: 20566536
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;30(4):451-65
pubmed: 17123174
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2016 May 20;2:39-46
pubmed: 29892715
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Feb 04;5:82-92
pubmed: 30014045
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Nov;35(11):2003-2011
pubmed: 30074130
Fertil Steril. 2010 Aug;94(3):921-6
pubmed: 19523614
Fertil Steril. 2017 Nov;108(5):815-821
pubmed: 28916332