Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) success rates and complications in endoscopic vs non-endoscopic approaches: a systematic review.
CDCR
Jones tube
canalicular obstruction
conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy
epiphora
systematic review
Journal
International forum of allergy & rhinology
ISSN: 2042-6984
Titre abrégé: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101550261
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
received:
27
04
2020
revised:
14
07
2020
accepted:
17
07
2020
pubmed:
8
8
2020
medline:
30
9
2021
entrez:
8
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Epiphora due to refractory bicanalicular obstructions is typically managed by conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) with or without the assistance of nasal endoscopy. However, the evidence for its benefit is unclear. A systematic review of the literature on the treatment of epiphora by CDCR was performed (March 1, 2018). All studies reporting original data on patients suffering from epiphora treated with CDCR surgery were included. Primary outcomes were success and satisfaction rates. Secondary outcomes were CDCR complications. A comparison was made between the results obtained in patients undergoing CDCR with vs without assistance of nasal endoscopy. Fifty-four studies representing information on 2555 CDCR procedures were included in the systematic review. All the studies are case series, most of them retrospective. Lester Jones tube (LJT) is the most commonly used in CDCR (66.7%). The overall success rate with all studies included (n = 2555) was 88.9%; 90.8% (n = 890) in CDCR with assistance of nasal endoscope and 87.7% (n = 1575) in the non-endoscopic approach. The overall "tube displacement" rate, the most common complication, was 24.5% (n = 2522), 20.8% (n = 1575) tube displacement in CDCR with assistance of nasal endoscope vs 26.7% (n = 1575) in the non-endoscopic approach. Only 3 studies (5.5%) used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to evaluate epiphora improvement. Due to the low level of evidence and the high bias of the studies, a meta-analysis was not performed. Based on the data available in the literature, CDCR is considered an effective procedure for treating epiphora due to proximal obstruction. Controlled and qualitative studies are needed to clarify the significance of the endoscope's contribution to CDCR.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Epiphora due to refractory bicanalicular obstructions is typically managed by conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) with or without the assistance of nasal endoscopy. However, the evidence for its benefit is unclear.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature on the treatment of epiphora by CDCR was performed (March 1, 2018). All studies reporting original data on patients suffering from epiphora treated with CDCR surgery were included. Primary outcomes were success and satisfaction rates. Secondary outcomes were CDCR complications. A comparison was made between the results obtained in patients undergoing CDCR with vs without assistance of nasal endoscopy.
RESULTS
Fifty-four studies representing information on 2555 CDCR procedures were included in the systematic review. All the studies are case series, most of them retrospective. Lester Jones tube (LJT) is the most commonly used in CDCR (66.7%). The overall success rate with all studies included (n = 2555) was 88.9%; 90.8% (n = 890) in CDCR with assistance of nasal endoscope and 87.7% (n = 1575) in the non-endoscopic approach. The overall "tube displacement" rate, the most common complication, was 24.5% (n = 2522), 20.8% (n = 1575) tube displacement in CDCR with assistance of nasal endoscope vs 26.7% (n = 1575) in the non-endoscopic approach. Only 3 studies (5.5%) used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to evaluate epiphora improvement. Due to the low level of evidence and the high bias of the studies, a meta-analysis was not performed.
CONCLUSION
Based on the data available in the literature, CDCR is considered an effective procedure for treating epiphora due to proximal obstruction. Controlled and qualitative studies are needed to clarify the significance of the endoscope's contribution to CDCR.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
174-194Informations de copyright
© 2020 ARS-AAOA, LLC.
Références
Jones LT. Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1965;59:773-783.
Lim C, Martin P, Benger R, Kourt G, Ghabrial R. Lacrimal canalicular bypass surgery with the Lester Jones tube. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:101-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2003.08.002.
Athanasiov PA, Madge S, Kakizaki H, Selva D. A review of bypass tubes for proximal lacrimal drainage obstruction. Surv Ophthalmol. 2011;56:252-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2011.02.009.
Watkins LM, Janfaza P, Rubin PAD. The evolution of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003;48:73-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6257(02)00397-1.
Devoto MH, Bernardini FP, De Conciliis C. Minimally invasive conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with Jones tube. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;22:253-255. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.iop.0000226861.02781.af.
Sindwani R, Kadze MS. Chronic rhinosinusitis and persistent epiphora following conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140:136-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2008.09.016.
Yip CC. Management of distal common canalicular obstruction. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2013;2:73-75. https://doi.org/10.1097/APO.0b013e3182902ffe.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, etal. Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual. Adelaide, Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2017:218-270. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-08.
Goel R, Kishore D, Nagpal S, Kumar S. Results of a new “mirror tuck technique” for fixation of lacrimal bypass tube in conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017;65:282-287. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_741_16.
Ali MJ, Honavar SG, Naik M. Endoscopically guided minimally invasive bypass tube intubation without DCR : evaluation of drainage and objective outcomes assessment. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2013;22:104-109. https://doi.org/10.3109/13645706.2012.708347.
Komínek P, Červenka S, Matoušek P, Pniak T, Zeleník K. Conjunctivocystorhinostomy with Jones tube-is it the surgery for children? Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;248:1339-1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1395-9.
Madge SN, Malhotra R, DeSousa J, et al. The lacrimal bypass tube for lacrimal pump failure attributable to facial palsy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149:155-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.08.012.
Steele EA, Dailey RA. Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with the frosted Jones Pyrex tube. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;25:42-43. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181911d13.
Fan X, Bi X, Fu Y, Zhou H. The use of Medpor coated tear drainage tube in conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy. Eye. 2008;22:1148-1153. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702870.
Fernández AM, Fernández AF, Fernández MA, Lara CM. [Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with the assistance of diode laser. Endoscopic placement of Jones lacrimal tubes]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2008;59:11-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2173-5735(08)70180-7. Spanish.
Park MS, Chi MJ, Baek SH. Clinical study of endoscopic endonasal conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with Jones tube placement. Ophthalmologica. 2007;221:36-40. https://doi.org/10.1159/000096520.
Choi WC, Yang SW. Endoscopy-guided transcaruncular Jones tube intubation without dacryocystorhinostomy. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2006;50:141-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-005-0284-y.
Boboridis KG, Downes RN. Endoscopic placement of Jones lacrimal tubes with the assistance of Holmium YAG laser. Orbit. 2005;24:67-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830590909728.
Lee JS, Jung G, Lee JE, Oum BS, Lee SH, Rho HJ. The treatment of lacrimal apparatus obstruction with the use of an inner canthal Jones tube insertion via a transcaruncular route. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2001;32:48-54.
Ahn ES, Dailey RA, Radmall B. The effectiveness and long-term outcome of conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with frosted Jones tubes. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;33:294-299. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000000764.
Trotter WL, Meyer DR. Endoscopic conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with Jones tube placement. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1206-1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00119-6.
Na J, Lee S, Park J, Lee H, Baek S. Surgical outcomes of endonasal conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy according to Jones tube location. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28:e500-e503. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003801.
Yu S, Yan W, Selva D, et al. Endoscopic transretracaruncular-middle meteas tract for insertion of a porous polyethylene-coated Jones tube. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27:e655-e659. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003009.
Vigo RL, Ortiz-Basso T, Vilas MN, Prémoli J. A millimetric ruler for Lester Jones tube placement in conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1523-1525. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S89653.
Bagdonaite L, Pearson AR. Twelve-year experience of Lester Jones tubes - results and comparison of 3 different tube types. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;31:352-356. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000000340.
Bagdonaite L, Pearson AR. Early experience with the StopLoss Jones tube. Orbit. 2015;34:132-136. https://doi.org/10.3109/01676830.2015.1014507.
Chang M, Lee H, Park M, Baek S. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic endonasal conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with Jones tube placement: a thirteen-year experience. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43:7-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2014.10.001.
Fang CH, Patel P, Huang G, Langer PD, Eloy JA. Selective partial middle turbinectomy to minimize postoperative obstruction following Lester Jones tube placement. Am J Otolaryngol Head Neck Med Surg. 2015;36:330-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2014.11.009.
Carroll JM, Beyer CK. Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy using silicone rubber lacrimal tubes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1973;89:113-115. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1973.01000040115010.
Hurwitz JJ. Teflon tubes for stenting and bypassing the lacrimal drainage pathways. Ophthalmic Surg. 1989;20:855-859. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2630965.
Arden RL, Mathog RH, Nesi FA. Flap reconstruction techniques in conjunctivorhinostomy. Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 1990;102:150-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/019459989010200209.
Kulwin DR, Tiradellis H, Levartovsky S, Kersten RC, Shumrick KA. The value of intranasal surgery in assuring the success of a conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;6:54-59. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002341-199003000-00009.
Rose GE, Welham RAN. Jones’ lacrimal canalicular bypass tubes: twenty-five years’ experience. Eye. 1991;5:13-19. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1991.3.
Sekhar GC, Dortzbach RK, Gonnering RS, Lemke BN. Problems associated with conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;112:502-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)76849-7.
Rosen N, Ashkenazi I, Rosner M. Patient dissatisfaction after functionally successful conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with Jones tube. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;117:636-42.
Liu D. Brief reports. Conjunctival incision for primary conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with Jones tube. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:P244-P245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(99)00329-3.
Murube J, Rojo P, Chenzhuo L. Soft tissue conjunctivo-rhinostomy. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2001;11:323-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/112067210101100401.
Chung YJ, Kim G, Sohn BK. Conjunctivorhinostomy with rubber-tipped Jones tube. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52:68-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000096443.81356.65.
Dailey RA, Tower RN. Frosted Jones Pyrex tubes. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;21:185-187. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.IOP.0000160595.34837.0C.
Steinsapir KD, Glatt HJ, Putterman AM. A 16-year study of conjunctival dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1990;109:387-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)74603-3.
Schwarcz RM, Lee S, Goldberg RA, Simon GJ. Modified conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy for upper lacrimal system obstruction. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007;9:96-100. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.9.2.96.
Abdulhafez M, Elgazayerli E, Mansour T, Khalaf MA. A new modification in the porous polyethylene-coated Lester Jones tube. Orbit. 2009;28:25-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830802414830.
Wojno T. Experience with a Medpor-coated tear drain. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;26:327-329. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181cb790f.
Aakalu V, Groat RS, Putterman A. Sixteen-year experience with the Putterman-Gladstone tube for conjunctival dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;28:393-395. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0b013e31826115fe.
Pushker N, Khurana S, Shrey D, Bajaj MS, Chawla B, Chandra M. Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy using a high-density porous polyethylene-coated tear drain tube. Int Ophthalmol. 2013;33:329-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-012-9619-0.
Sendul SY, Cagatay HH, Dirim B, et al. Comparison of Medpor coated tear drainage tube versus silicon tear drainage tube in conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy: problems and solutions. Sci World J. 2014;2014:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/164834.
Witters E, Mombaerts I. The survival of an angled extended Jones’ tube. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:1523-1526. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306305.
Bhattacharjee K, Kuri G. Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with mucus membrane graft-a modified lacrimal bypass conduit. Presented at the 73rd Annual Conference of the All India Ophthalmological Society (AIOC); February 2015; New Delhi, India; 2015. http://proceedings.aios.org/aiosedu/uploads/BOB_9_15.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2020.
Kaynak P, Karabulut GO, Ozturker C, et al. Comparison of botulinum toxin-A injection in lacrimal gland and conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy for treatment of epiphora due to proximal lacrimal system obstruction. Eye. 2016;30:1056-1062. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.88.
Perry CB, Dailey RA. Success rate of variable collar size frosted Jones tubes. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;34:262-265. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000000942.
Murube-del-Castillo J. Conjunctivorhinostomy without osteal perforation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:310-311. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1982.01030030312018.
Lamping K, Levine MR. Jones’ tubes: how good are they? Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101:260-261. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1983.01040010262016.
Campbell CC 3rd, Shannon GM, Flanagan JC. Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with mucous membrane graft. Ophthalmic Surg. 1983;14:647-652.
Welham RA, Guthoff R. The Lester-Jones tube: a 15-year follow-up. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1985;223:106-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02150955.
Henderson PN. A modified trephining technique for the insertion of Jones tube. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103:1582-1585. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1985.01050100158041.
Nissen JN, Sørensen T. Conjunctivorhinostomy. A study of 21 cases. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1987;65:30-36. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3577704.
Betharia SM, Arora R, Kumar S. Comparative evaluation of Jones pyrex tubes and polyethylene tubes in conjunctivo-dacryocystorhinostomy. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1988;36:162-164. http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?1988/36/4/162/26120.
Song Y, Baudoin M, Manneville P, Baroud CN. The air-liquid flow in a microfluidic airway tree. Med Eng Phys. 2011;33:849-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.10.001.
Zilelioĝlu G, Gündüz K. Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with Jones tube. A 10-year study. Doc Ophthalmol. 1996;92:97-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02583282.
Putterman AM, Epstein G. Combined Jones tube-canalicular intubation and conjunctival dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1981;91:513-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(81)90242-7.
Leone CR Jr. Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with buccal mucosal graft. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:113-115. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1995.01100010115031.
Steele EA. Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with Jones tube: a history and update. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016;27:439-442. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000287.