Functional deficits in chronic mechanical ankle instability.
Adult
Ankle Injuries
/ complications
Ankle Joint
/ physiopathology
Arthroscopy
/ methods
Biomechanical Phenomena
Chronic Disease
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Gait Analysis
/ methods
Humans
Joint Instability
/ diagnosis
Male
Muscle Strength
/ physiology
Physical Functional Performance
Pronation
/ physiology
Range of Motion, Articular
/ physiology
Retrospective Studies
Sprains and Strains
/ complications
Supination
/ physiology
Torque
Mechanical ankle instability
Performance deficits
Peroneal dysfunction
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Aug 2020
06 Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
15
05
2020
accepted:
30
07
2020
entrez:
9
8
2020
pubmed:
9
8
2020
medline:
21
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The interaction of functional and mechanical deficits in chronic ankle instability remains a major issue in current research. After an index sprain, some patients develop sufficient coping strategies, while others require mechanical support. This study aimed to analyze persisting functional deficits in mechanically unstable ankles requiring operative stabilization. We retrospectively analyzed the functional testing of 43 patients suffering from chronic, unilateral mechanical ankle instability (MAI) and in which long-term conservative treatment had failed. Manual testing and arthroscopy confirmed mechanical instability. The functional testing included balance test, gait analysis, and concentric-concentric, isokinetic strength measurements and was compared between the non-affected and the MAI ankles. Plantarflexion, supination, and pronation strength was significantly reduced in MAI ankles. A sub-analysis of the strength measurement revealed that in non-MAI ankles, the peak pronation torque was reached earlier during pronation (maximum peak torque angle at 20° vs. 14° of supination, p < 0.001). Furthermore, active range of motion was reduced in dorsiflexion and supination. In balance testing, patients exhibited a significant increased perimeter for the injured ankle (p < 0.02). During gait analysis, we observed an increased external rotation in MAI (8.7 vs. 6.8°, p<0.02). This study assesses functional deficits existent in a well-defined population of patients suffering from chronic MAI. Impairments of postural sway, gait asymmetries, and asymmetric isokinetic strength can be observed despite long-term functional treatment. The finding that pronation strength is particularly reduced with the foot in a close-to-accident position indicates potential muscular dysfunction in MAI. Possibly, these deficits alongside the underlying mechanical instability characterize patients requiring mechanical stabilization.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The interaction of functional and mechanical deficits in chronic ankle instability remains a major issue in current research. After an index sprain, some patients develop sufficient coping strategies, while others require mechanical support. This study aimed to analyze persisting functional deficits in mechanically unstable ankles requiring operative stabilization.
METHODS
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed the functional testing of 43 patients suffering from chronic, unilateral mechanical ankle instability (MAI) and in which long-term conservative treatment had failed. Manual testing and arthroscopy confirmed mechanical instability. The functional testing included balance test, gait analysis, and concentric-concentric, isokinetic strength measurements and was compared between the non-affected and the MAI ankles.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Plantarflexion, supination, and pronation strength was significantly reduced in MAI ankles. A sub-analysis of the strength measurement revealed that in non-MAI ankles, the peak pronation torque was reached earlier during pronation (maximum peak torque angle at 20° vs. 14° of supination, p < 0.001). Furthermore, active range of motion was reduced in dorsiflexion and supination. In balance testing, patients exhibited a significant increased perimeter for the injured ankle (p < 0.02). During gait analysis, we observed an increased external rotation in MAI (8.7 vs. 6.8°, p<0.02).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study assesses functional deficits existent in a well-defined population of patients suffering from chronic MAI. Impairments of postural sway, gait asymmetries, and asymmetric isokinetic strength can be observed despite long-term functional treatment. The finding that pronation strength is particularly reduced with the foot in a close-to-accident position indicates potential muscular dysfunction in MAI. Possibly, these deficits alongside the underlying mechanical instability characterize patients requiring mechanical stabilization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32762704
doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01847-8
pii: 10.1186/s13018-020-01847-8
pmc: PMC7412640
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
304Références
Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Dec;38(12):1318-1323
pubmed: 29034742
Gait Posture. 2007 Jun;26(1):17-24
pubmed: 16905322
J Biomech. 2002 Apr;35(4):543-8
pubmed: 11934426
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Mar;46(3):546-56
pubmed: 23899892
J Athl Train. 2019 Jun;54(6):572-588
pubmed: 31162943
J Sport Rehabil. 2009 Aug;18(3):375-88
pubmed: 19827501
J Orthop Res. 2018 Jan;36(1):515-524
pubmed: 28653780
J Athl Train. 2011 Mar-Apr;46(2):133-41
pubmed: 21391798
Gait Posture. 2017 Feb;52:62-67
pubmed: 27880888
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2015 Dec;30(10):1170-4
pubmed: 26324333
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Dec;99(8 Suppl):S411-9
pubmed: 24268842
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 May;28(5):1600-1610
pubmed: 29980804
Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Nov;31(11):994-1000
pubmed: 21189193
Sports Med. 2018 Jan;48(1):189-205
pubmed: 28887759
J Athl Train. 2009 Nov-Dec;44(6):653-62
pubmed: 19911093
Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Jun 16;4(6):2325967116653719
pubmed: 27570782
J Athl Train. 2014 Jan-Feb;49(1):121-7
pubmed: 24377963
Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Nov;32(11):1075-80
pubmed: 22338958
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Aug;25(8):2228-34
pubmed: 21685809
Front Integr Neurosci. 2018 Dec 19;12:62
pubmed: 30618657
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Mar;48(5):377-82
pubmed: 24124039
J Athl Train. 2012 May-Jun;47(3):339-57
pubmed: 22892416
Gait Posture. 1998 Jan 1;7(1):77-95
pubmed: 10200378
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Apr;41(4):858-64
pubmed: 23388673
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jul;26(7):2095-2102
pubmed: 28439639
J Orthop Res. 2019 May;37(5):1133-1142
pubmed: 30908733
Gait Posture. 2017 Feb;52:381-399
pubmed: 28063387
J Foot Ankle Res. 2018 Feb 26;11:7
pubmed: 29492109
Gait Posture. 2014 Mar;39(3):894-8
pubmed: 24365326
Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Jun;38(6):621-626
pubmed: 28552041
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Sep;37(9):1755-61
pubmed: 19617530
J Athl Train. 2015 Apr;50(4):350-7
pubmed: 25562453
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Sep;117(9):1833-1843
pubmed: 28687953
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Apr;24(4):1081-5
pubmed: 26017745
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Oct;35(10):1068-74
pubmed: 24942616
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Jan;39(1):105-112
pubmed: 28992742
Am J Sports Med. 2002 May-Jun;30(3):402-9
pubmed: 12016082
J Sci Med Sport. 2010 Jan;13(1):2-12
pubmed: 19442581
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Dec;34(12):1970-6
pubmed: 16926342
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Dec;25(6):806-17
pubmed: 25545409
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(7):e14503
pubmed: 30762779
J Sport Rehabil. 2019 Sep 1;28(7):752-757
pubmed: 30222475
Br J Sports Med. 2011 Jun;45(8):660-72
pubmed: 21257670
Am J Sports Med. 1999 Jan-Feb;27(1):69-75
pubmed: 9934422
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Dec;22(6):997-1002
pubmed: 22795679
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Nov;78(6):958-62
pubmed: 8951015
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2019 Dec;70:107-114
pubmed: 31472302
Foot Ankle Int. 2007 Jan;28(1):109-25
pubmed: 17257549
J Athl Train. 2013 Jul-Aug;48(4):528-45
pubmed: 23855363
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Nov;42(11):2106-21
pubmed: 20351590
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004 Oct;19(8):868-71
pubmed: 15342160
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):193-201
pubmed: 21917613