Association of Lifestyle Factors and Neuropsychological Development of 4-Year-Old Children.
child health
cohort study
lifestyle factors
neuropsychological development
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 08 2020
05 08 2020
Historique:
received:
01
07
2020
revised:
21
07
2020
accepted:
31
07
2020
entrez:
9
8
2020
pubmed:
9
8
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We aimed to assess how lifestyle factors such as diet, sleep, screen viewing, and physical activity, individually, as well as in a combined score, were associated with neuropsychological development in pre-school age children. We conducted a cross-sectional study in 1650 children of 4 years of age, from the Environment and Childhood Project (INMA) population-based birth cohorts in four regions of Spain. Children were classified per a childhood healthy lifestyle score (CHLS) with a range of 0 to 4 that included eating in concordance with the Mediterranean diet (1 point); reaching recommended sleep time (1 point); watching a maximum recommended screen time (1 point); and being physically active (1 point). The McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities (MSCA) were used to test neuropsychological development. Multi-adjusted linear regression models were created to assess the association with the lifestyle factors individually and as a combined score. CHLS was not associated with MSCA general cognitive score (1-point increment = -0.5, 95% CI: -1.2, 0.2). Analyzed by separate lifestyle factors, physical activity had a significant negative association with MSCA score and less TV/screen time had a negative association with MSCA score. In this cross-sectional study, a combined score of lifestyle factors is not related to neuropsychological development at pre-school age.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
We aimed to assess how lifestyle factors such as diet, sleep, screen viewing, and physical activity, individually, as well as in a combined score, were associated with neuropsychological development in pre-school age children.
METHODS
We conducted a cross-sectional study in 1650 children of 4 years of age, from the Environment and Childhood Project (INMA) population-based birth cohorts in four regions of Spain. Children were classified per a childhood healthy lifestyle score (CHLS) with a range of 0 to 4 that included eating in concordance with the Mediterranean diet (1 point); reaching recommended sleep time (1 point); watching a maximum recommended screen time (1 point); and being physically active (1 point). The McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities (MSCA) were used to test neuropsychological development. Multi-adjusted linear regression models were created to assess the association with the lifestyle factors individually and as a combined score.
RESULTS
CHLS was not associated with MSCA general cognitive score (1-point increment = -0.5, 95% CI: -1.2, 0.2). Analyzed by separate lifestyle factors, physical activity had a significant negative association with MSCA score and less TV/screen time had a negative association with MSCA score.
CONCLUSION
In this cross-sectional study, a combined score of lifestyle factors is not related to neuropsychological development at pre-school age.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32764493
pii: ijerph17165668
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165668
pmc: PMC7459714
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Feb 1;183(3):169-82
pubmed: 26740026
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 May;32(5):963-75
pubmed: 10795788
Pediatrics. 2016 Nov;138(5):
pubmed: 27940793
Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Jul;82(1):163-73
pubmed: 16002815
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2018 Apr;39(3):192-199
pubmed: 29261536
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2015 Jan;18(1):51-62
pubmed: 25405316
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;73(1):73-9
pubmed: 26629780
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 19;15(4):
pubmed: 29671803
Arch Dis Child. 2006 Jan;91(1):35-8
pubmed: 16239246
Prev Med. 2015 Sep;78:115-22
pubmed: 26212631
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014 May-Jun;46(3):164-170
pubmed: 24433816
J Sleep Res. 2018 Jun;27(3):e12636
pubmed: 29164715
Public Health Nutr. 2009 Oct;12(10):1702-10
pubmed: 19026093
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2001 Jan-Feb;75(1):13-22
pubmed: 11400411
Psychol Bull. 2012 Nov;138(6):1109-38
pubmed: 22545685
Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Aug;41(4):930-40
pubmed: 21471022
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Apr 22;3:379-90
pubmed: 27419040
Int J Obes (Lond). 2014 Sep;38 Suppl 2:S135-43
pubmed: 25376215
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Jun;48(6):1197-222
pubmed: 27182986
Sleep. 2011 May 01;34(5):633-9
pubmed: 21532957
Eur J Nutr. 2017 Oct;56(7):2299-2308
pubmed: 27612875
J Pediatr. 2002 Jan;140(1):81-5
pubmed: 11815768
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2016 Oct;63(5):827-39
pubmed: 27565361
Prev Med. 2011 Jun;52 Suppl 1:S21-8
pubmed: 21281669
Br J Nutr. 2016 Apr;115(8):1431-7
pubmed: 26887648
Child Dev. 2013 Sep-Oct;84(5):1542-53
pubmed: 23432661
Nutr J. 2013 Feb 19;12:26
pubmed: 23421854
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 May;168(5):458-64
pubmed: 24615283
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):1258-63
pubmed: 15520105
Sleep Health. 2015 Mar;1(1):40-43
pubmed: 29073412
Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2014 Jul-Aug;91(1-2):1-20
pubmed: 24908517
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2760716
pubmed: 29387718
Arch Pediatr. 2009 Jan;16(1):47-53
pubmed: 19036567