Macaque Gaze Responses to the Primatar: A Virtual Macaque Head for Social Cognition Research.

Macaca fascicularis Macaca mulatta eye tracking social attention uncanny valley virtual primate

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 14 01 2020
accepted: 17 06 2020
entrez: 9 8 2020
pubmed: 9 8 2020
medline: 9 8 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Following the expanding use and applications of virtual reality in everyday life, realistic virtual stimuli are of increasing interest in cognitive studies. They allow for control of features such as gaze, expression, appearance, and movement, which may help to overcome limitations of using photographs or video recordings to study social responses. In using virtual stimuli however, one must be careful to avoid the uncanny valley effect, where realistic stimuli can be perceived as eerie, and induce an aversion response. At the same time, it is important to establish whether responses to virtual stimuli mirror responses to depictions of a real conspecific. In the current study, we describe the development of a new virtual monkey head with realistic facial features for experiments with nonhuman primates, the "Primatar." As a first step toward validation, we assessed how monkeys respond to facial images of a prototype of this Primatar compared to images of real monkeys (RMs), and an unrealistic model. We also compared gaze responses between original images and scrambled as well as obfuscated versions of these images. We measured looking time to images in six freely moving long-tailed macaques (

Identifiants

pubmed: 32765373
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01645
pmc: PMC7379899
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1645

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Wilson, Kade, Moeller, Treue, Kagan and Fischer.

Références

Curr Biol. 2016 Jul 11;26(13):1744-1749
pubmed: 27345168
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 7;270 Suppl 2:S144-6
pubmed: 14667364
Cognition. 2006 Oct;101(3):515-29
pubmed: 16448641
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 18;7(1):17715
pubmed: 29255155
PLoS Biol. 2016 Feb 22;14(2):e1002390
pubmed: 26901857
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 10;6:390
pubmed: 25914661
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0190190
pubmed: 29293564
Br J Psychol. 2018 Aug;109(3):395-417
pubmed: 29504117
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Feb;49(1):35-45
pubmed: 26896242
J Comp Psychol. 2017 Feb;131(1):73-77
pubmed: 28182489
Neuron. 2014 Jun 18;82(6):1200-4
pubmed: 24945764
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e44387
pubmed: 22952968
Psychol Med. 2018 Feb;48(3):362-391
pubmed: 28735593
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 08;15(6):
pubmed: 29890627
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 19;5:1219
pubmed: 25477829
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 22;6:19669
pubmed: 26794858
Cognition. 2012 Oct;125(1):125-30
pubmed: 22784682
Behav Processes. 2016 Mar;124:38-46
pubmed: 26476153
PLoS Biol. 2019 Aug 6;17(8):e3000387
pubmed: 31386656
Dev Psychobiol. 2018 Mar;60(2):187-193
pubmed: 29165801
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 27;106(43):18362-6
pubmed: 19822765
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2014 Jul 1;68(7):1215-1224
pubmed: 25246728
Dev Psychobiol. 2010 Jan;52(1):54-61
pubmed: 19937740
J Neurosci Methods. 2019 Aug 1;324:108309
pubmed: 31229584
J Neurosci. 2017 Feb 22;37(8):2234-2257
pubmed: 28119401
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 29;110(5):1959-63
pubmed: 23319616
Dev Sci. 2014 Nov;17(6):833-40
pubmed: 24995706
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Nov 24;5:126
pubmed: 22131970
Child Dev. 2019 Jul;90(4):1202-1214
pubmed: 29236300
Cognition. 2016 Jan;146:190-205
pubmed: 26435049
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 04;6(2):e16453
pubmed: 21326600
Dev Psychobiol. 2016 Dec;58(8):926-936
pubmed: 27195755
Anim Cogn. 2004 Jan;7(1):25-36
pubmed: 14745584
Curr Biol. 2005 Mar 29;15(6):543-8
pubmed: 15797023
Curr Biol. 2009 Mar 24;19(6):509-13
pubmed: 19249210
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Mar 1;119(3):796-807
pubmed: 29142094
Anim Behav. 2009 Jun;77(6):1507-1513
pubmed: 20228886
J Neurosci. 2019 Aug 14;39(33):6555-6570
pubmed: 31263064
Front Psychol. 2013 Mar 07;4:108
pubmed: 23471214
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 21;5:1488
pubmed: 25653623
Perception. 2019 Oct;48(10):968-991
pubmed: 31474183

Auteurs

Vanessa A D Wilson (VAD)

Department of Primate Cognition, Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach Institute for Zoology and Anthropology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Cognitive Ethology Laboratory, German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen, Germany.
Leibniz-ScienceCampus Primate Cognition, Göttingen, Germany.

Carolin Kade (C)

Cognitive Ethology Laboratory, German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen, Germany.

Sebastian Moeller (S)

Leibniz-ScienceCampus Primate Cognition, Göttingen, Germany.
Georg-Elias-Müller Institute of Psychology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen, Germany.

Stefan Treue (S)

Leibniz-ScienceCampus Primate Cognition, Göttingen, Germany.
Georg-Elias-Müller Institute of Psychology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen, Germany.
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Göttingen, Germany.

Igor Kagan (I)

Leibniz-ScienceCampus Primate Cognition, Göttingen, Germany.
Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen, Germany.

Julia Fischer (J)

Department of Primate Cognition, Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach Institute for Zoology and Anthropology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Cognitive Ethology Laboratory, German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen, Germany.
Leibniz-ScienceCampus Primate Cognition, Göttingen, Germany.

Classifications MeSH