Comparison of serum fibrosis biomarkers for diagnosing significant liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.
Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer
N-terminal type III collagen propeptide
chronic hepatitis B
liver fibrosis
liver necroinflammation
Journal
Experimental and therapeutic medicine
ISSN: 1792-0981
Titre abrégé: Exp Ther Med
Pays: Greece
ID NLM: 101531947
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
24
06
2019
accepted:
04
02
2020
entrez:
9
8
2020
pubmed:
9
8
2020
medline:
9
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The diagnosis of liver fibrosis has a key role in selecting patients with CHB for antiviral treatment. However, serum biomarkers demonstrate limited diagnostic utility. The present study aimed to compare the performances of fibrosis biomarkers for diagnosing significant liver fibrosis that indicates the need for antiviral therapy in patients with CHB and to identify the most appropriate biomarker for these patients. The current study included 96 antiviral-naïve patients with CHB who underwent liver biopsy. METAVIR scoring system was used to assess liver fibrosis and necroinflammation. The diagnostic performances were evaluated of the platelet (PLT) count; the levels of hyaluronan, serum 7S domain of type 4 collagen, procollagen type III N-terminal peptide, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1, Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) and N-terminal type III collagen propeptide (Pro-C3); the fibrosis index based on four factors; the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index; and enhanced liver fibrosis score for identifying significant liver fibrosis [≥fibrosis stage 2 (F2)]. All fibrosis biomarkers, except the Pro-C3 level, correlated with the fibrosis stage. M2BPGi was better than other biomarkers for diagnosing ≥F2, with the highest area under the curve of 0.902. M2BPGi demonstrated a higher diagnostic accuracy for significant fibrosis than mild/severe fibrosis or cirrhosis. However, no significant correlation was observed between the M2BPGi level and fibrosis stage in patients with CHB having significant liver necroinflammation defined as ≥ necroinflammatory activity 2. The M2BPGi level and PLT count were exclusively correlated with the fibrosis stage in 73 patients without significant liver necroinflammation. M2BPGi demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance for significant fibrosis in patients having significant liver fibrosis with no significant liver necroinflammation. In conclusion, the M2BPGi level can accurately diagnose significant liver fibrosis that indicates the need for antiviral therapy in patients with CHB.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32765655
doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8798
pii: ETM-0-0-8798
pmc: PMC7388477
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
985-995Informations de copyright
Copyright: © Tsuji et al.
Références
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jul;32(7):1387-1393
pubmed: 28008658
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 17;8(1):12414
pubmed: 30120271
Hepatol Res. 2019 Jan;49(1):33-41
pubmed: 30419152
Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Oct;97(10):2614-8
pubmed: 12385448
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2018 Jun 19;9(6):163
pubmed: 29915243
Hepatol Res. 2016 Jul;46(8):758-64
pubmed: 26574180
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2007 Dec;16(4):425-6
pubmed: 18193125
J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul;53(7):819-826
pubmed: 29318378
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 May;88(1):7-11
pubmed: 28256292
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;53(1):83-87
pubmed: 29069995
Hepatol Res. 2018 Dec;48(13):1131-1139
pubmed: 30030872
Clin Chim Acta. 1984 Dec 15;144(1):1-10
pubmed: 6542469
Ann Lab Med. 2018 Jul;38(4):348-354
pubmed: 29611385
Clin Biochem Rev. 2007 Feb;28(1):3-10
pubmed: 17603636
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2013;32(5):1125-36
pubmed: 24247107
Abdom Imaging. 2015 Apr;40(4):766-75
pubmed: 25805619
Liver Int. 2010 Apr;30(4):546-53
pubmed: 20074094
PLoS One. 2017 May 5;12(5):e0177302
pubmed: 28475652
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 30;7(1):14352
pubmed: 29085039
Ann Hepatol. 2017 May - Jun 2017;16(3):349-357
pubmed: 28425404
Hepatol Res. 2019 Sep;49(9):1015-1025
pubmed: 31021038
J Viral Hepat. 2016 Dec;23(12):977-984
pubmed: 27476460
Hepatology. 1994 Jul;20(1 Pt 1):15-20
pubmed: 8020885
Hepatol Res. 2017 Mar;47(3):E74-E84
pubmed: 27075409
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Feb;5(3):40
pubmed: 28251119
BMC Gastroenterol. 2011 Aug 17;11:91
pubmed: 21849046
J Gastroenterol. 2005 Feb;40(2):215-6
pubmed: 15770410
J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb;54(2):204-205
pubmed: 30413873
Am J Transl Res. 2013 Apr 19;5(3):303-15
pubmed: 23634241
Hepatol Res. 2014 Jan;44 Suppl S1:1-58
pubmed: 24397839
Hepatology. 2018 Apr;67(4):1560-1599
pubmed: 29405329
Hepatol Res. 2017 Feb;47(2):204-215
pubmed: 26990490
Hepatol Res. 2019 Jul;49(7):721-730
pubmed: 30884015
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Oct 22;5(11):ofy268
pubmed: 30443558
Hepatol Res. 2017 Nov;47(12):1317-1328
pubmed: 28029729
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep 28;23(36):6705-6714
pubmed: 29085215
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1994;204:1-72
pubmed: 7824871