Kissing catheter technique for percutaneous catheter drainage of necrotic pancreatic collections in acute pancreatitis.
acute pancreatitis
collections
percutaneous catheter drainage
Journal
Experimental and therapeutic medicine
ISSN: 1792-0981
Titre abrégé: Exp Ther Med
Pays: Greece
ID NLM: 101531947
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
04
11
2019
accepted:
29
04
2020
entrez:
9
8
2020
pubmed:
9
8
2020
medline:
9
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
One of the critical factors for predicting the success of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) is the mean CT density of collection. A higher CT density suggests more necrotic solid tissue within the collection. In the present study, a novel technique for PCD of the necrotic pancreatic collection with a higher mean CT density was evaluated. It was a retrospective study of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) who underwent PCD of pancreatic collections between May 2018 and December 2018. Patients with pancreatic collections having a CT density of >30 Hounsfield Units (HU) were considered for PCD using the kissing catheter technique. This technique involved placing two catheters side-by-side through a single cutaneous entry site, as the conventional technique of PCD may not be effective. The technical details, outcomes and complications of this technique were recorded. A total of 10 patients with a mean age of 30 years underwent PCD using this technique. All patients had severe pancreatitis with a mean CT severity index of 9 (range, 8-10). The mean CT density was 37 HU (range, 32-56). Successful management with PCD alone was achieved in 8 patients. The other 2 patients underwent surgical necrosectomy. One patient who underwent surgical necrosectomy died. Minor complications occurred in 3 patients. The kissing catheter technique allows for a higher success rate of PCD compared with that of the conventional method of PCD, in collections with a higher mean CT density.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32765710
doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8897
pii: ETM-0-0-8897
pmc: PMC7401886
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2311-2316Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020, Spandidos Publications.
Références
Trials. 2019 Apr 25;20(1):239
pubmed: 31023380
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Feb 5;:
pubmed: 32026280
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Apr;170(4):969-75
pubmed: 9530046
Ann Surg. 2000 Mar;231(3):361-7
pubmed: 10714629
Pancreatology. 2018 Oct;18(7):727-733
pubmed: 30146334
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1491-502
pubmed: 20410514
Pancreatology. 2020 Jan;20(1):9-15
pubmed: 31780286
Gut. 2013 Jan;62(1):102-11
pubmed: 23100216
JGH Open. 2019 Apr 17;3(6):450-455
pubmed: 31832543
Arch Surg. 2009 Mar;144(3):261-5
pubmed: 19289666
Surg Endosc. 2015 Nov;29(11):3282-91
pubmed: 25631111
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2929-34
pubmed: 26487212
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2019 Oct-Dec;82(4):495-500
pubmed: 31950804
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):787-92
pubmed: 25775071
World J Surg. 1988 Apr;12(2):255-62
pubmed: 3394351
Indian J Surg. 2016 Jun;78(3):221-228
pubmed: 27358518
World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Feb 7;14(5):725-30
pubmed: 18205262
Br J Surg. 2011 Jan;98(1):18-27
pubmed: 21136562
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Mar;27(3):418-25
pubmed: 26806694
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jan;192(1):110-6
pubmed: 19098188
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 May;45(5):1517-1523
pubmed: 31960118
Dig Surg. 2005;22(6):446-51; discussion 452
pubmed: 16479114
Radiology. 1999 Nov;213(2):573-8
pubmed: 10551244
Pancreas. 2012 Mar;41(2):302-5
pubmed: 21926935
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Nov;32(11):1722-32
pubmed: 16967294
Pancreas. 2017 Apr;46(4):518-523
pubmed: 28196022