High incidence of false-positive results of IgG antibody against SARS-CoV-2 with rapid immunochromatographic antibody test due to human common cold coronavirus infection.

Coronavirus disease 2019 Coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19 Immunity passport Prevalence Rapid immunochromatographic antibody testing Rapid immunochromatographic antibody testing, RIAT Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, SARS-CoV-2

Journal

Respiratory medicine case reports
ISSN: 2213-0071
Titre abrégé: Respir Med Case Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101604463

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 29 06 2020
revised: 06 07 2020
accepted: 20 07 2020
entrez: 9 8 2020
pubmed: 9 8 2020
medline: 9 8 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We experienced a 72-year-old man who developed laboratory-confirmed human coronavirus HKU1 pneumonia. PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 from a nasopharyngeal specimen was negative twice, and rapid immunochromatographic antibody test (RIAT) using a commercially available kit for IgM and IgG against SARS-CoV-2 showed him turning positive for IgG against SARS-CoV-2. We then performed RIAT in stored serum samples from other patients who suffered laboratory-confirmed human common cold coronaviruses (n = 6) and viruses other than coronavirus (influenza virus, n = 3; rhinovirus, n = 3; metapneumovirus, n = 1; adenovirus, n = 1) admitted until January 2019. Including the present case, four of 7 (57%) showed false-positive RIAT results due to human common cold coronaviruses infection. Two of the 4 patients showed initial negative to subsequent positive RIAT results, indicating seroconversion. RIAT was positive for IgG and IgM in viruses other than coronavirus in 2 (25.0%) and 1 (12.5%) patient. Because of high incidence of false positive RIAT results, cross antigenicity between human common cold coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2 can be considered. Results of RIAT should be interpreted in light of epidemics of human common cold coronaviruses infection. Prevalence of past SARS-CoV-2 infection may be overestimated due to high incidence of false-positive RIAT results.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32766111
doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2020.101180
pii: S2213-0071(20)30394-4
pii: 101180
pmc: PMC7381928
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

101180

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors report no potential conflicts of interest exist with any companies/organisations whose products or services may be discussed in this letter.

Références

Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Oct;13(10):1562-4
pubmed: 18258008
Cell. 2020 Jun 25;181(7):1489-1501.e15
pubmed: 32473127
J Med Virol. 2020 May;92(5):512-517
pubmed: 32073157
Lancet. 2020 Apr 4;395(10230):1101-1102
pubmed: 32247384
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 May;94:49-52
pubmed: 32251798
J Virol. 2020 Jun 16;94(13):
pubmed: 32303592

Auteurs

Shun Shibata (S)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kumagaya, Saitama, 360-0105, Japan.

Takashi Ishiguro (T)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kumagaya, Saitama, 360-0105, Japan.

Yasuhito Kobayashi (Y)

Pathology, Kumagaya, Saitama, 360-0105, Japan.

Mayumi Koike (M)

Laboratory Medicine, Kumagaya, Saitama, 360-0105, Japan.

Tsuyoshi Numano (T)

Laboratory Medicine, Kumagaya, Saitama, 360-0105, Japan.

Yoshihiko Shimizu (Y)

Pathology, Kumagaya, Saitama, 360-0105, Japan.

Noboru Takayanagi (N)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kumagaya, Saitama, 360-0105, Japan.

Classifications MeSH