High incidence of false-positive results of IgG antibody against SARS-CoV-2 with rapid immunochromatographic antibody test due to human common cold coronavirus infection.
Coronavirus disease 2019
Coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19
Immunity passport
Prevalence
Rapid immunochromatographic antibody testing
Rapid immunochromatographic antibody testing, RIAT
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, SARS-CoV-2
Journal
Respiratory medicine case reports
ISSN: 2213-0071
Titre abrégé: Respir Med Case Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101604463
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
29
06
2020
revised:
06
07
2020
accepted:
20
07
2020
entrez:
9
8
2020
pubmed:
9
8
2020
medline:
9
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We experienced a 72-year-old man who developed laboratory-confirmed human coronavirus HKU1 pneumonia. PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 from a nasopharyngeal specimen was negative twice, and rapid immunochromatographic antibody test (RIAT) using a commercially available kit for IgM and IgG against SARS-CoV-2 showed him turning positive for IgG against SARS-CoV-2. We then performed RIAT in stored serum samples from other patients who suffered laboratory-confirmed human common cold coronaviruses (n = 6) and viruses other than coronavirus (influenza virus, n = 3; rhinovirus, n = 3; metapneumovirus, n = 1; adenovirus, n = 1) admitted until January 2019. Including the present case, four of 7 (57%) showed false-positive RIAT results due to human common cold coronaviruses infection. Two of the 4 patients showed initial negative to subsequent positive RIAT results, indicating seroconversion. RIAT was positive for IgG and IgM in viruses other than coronavirus in 2 (25.0%) and 1 (12.5%) patient. Because of high incidence of false positive RIAT results, cross antigenicity between human common cold coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2 can be considered. Results of RIAT should be interpreted in light of epidemics of human common cold coronaviruses infection. Prevalence of past SARS-CoV-2 infection may be overestimated due to high incidence of false-positive RIAT results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32766111
doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2020.101180
pii: S2213-0071(20)30394-4
pii: 101180
pmc: PMC7381928
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
101180Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no potential conflicts of interest exist with any companies/organisations whose products or services may be discussed in this letter.
Références
Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Oct;13(10):1562-4
pubmed: 18258008
Cell. 2020 Jun 25;181(7):1489-1501.e15
pubmed: 32473127
J Med Virol. 2020 May;92(5):512-517
pubmed: 32073157
Lancet. 2020 Apr 4;395(10230):1101-1102
pubmed: 32247384
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 May;94:49-52
pubmed: 32251798
J Virol. 2020 Jun 16;94(13):
pubmed: 32303592