The Effect of Total Knee Arthroplasty on Hindfoot Alignment in Patients with Severe Genu Varum and Genu Valgum.
Genu valgum
Genu varum
Hindfoot alignment
Knee arthroplasty
Journal
The archives of bone and joint surgery
ISSN: 2345-4644
Titre abrégé: Arch Bone Jt Surg
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101636743
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
entrez:
9
8
2020
pubmed:
9
8
2020
medline:
9
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The maintenance of deformity in the ankle and hindfoot after correction of knee deformity following knee arthroplasty may cause abnormal tension in the knee and patient dissatisfaction. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of knee arthroplasty on the hindfoot alignment in patients with severe genu varum and valgum. A total of 84 patients with primary osteoarthritis, were enrolled in the study. The knee deformity was measured using a long leg film before surgery. The long axial radiographic view of hindfoot was taken in the standing position for all patients, before and six months after surgery. Comparisons were made on changes in the hindfoot angles measured before and after surgery. A total of 84 patients with mean age of 62.28 ± 7.77 years, 77 (92%) and seven patients (eight percent) had knee varus and valgus deformity, respectively. In the knee varus group, the mean preoperative hindfoot angle was + 5.32 ± 6.12 ° (valgus) which was changed to - 0.25 ± 4.91 ° (varus) in the postoperative phase. In the knee valgus group, the mean pre and postoperative hindfoot angles were - 7.71 ± 7.06° (varus) and - 2.14 ± 5.92 ° (varus), respectively. The mean preoperative hindfoot angle in severe and very severe varus knee groups were + 5.45 ± 3.30 and + 5.28 ± 6.86 °, respectively. These angles were changed to + 0.21± 5.17 and -1.60 ± 3.89° six months after surgery, respectively. The mean preoperative hindfoot angle in severe and very severe valgus knee deformity groups were - 7.00 ± 4.69 and -8.66 ± 10.69 °, respectively. These angles were changed to - 2.00 ± 5.71 and - 2.33 ± 7.50 °after surgery, respectively. There was no significant difference between patients with severe and very severe deformity in terms of pre and post-operative hindfoot angle. The hindfoot alignment is significantly corrected after knee arthroplasty. The severity of knee deformity does not correlate with the severity of the hindfoot deformity before and after surgery.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The maintenance of deformity in the ankle and hindfoot after correction of knee deformity following knee arthroplasty may cause abnormal tension in the knee and patient dissatisfaction. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of knee arthroplasty on the hindfoot alignment in patients with severe genu varum and valgum.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 84 patients with primary osteoarthritis, were enrolled in the study. The knee deformity was measured using a long leg film before surgery. The long axial radiographic view of hindfoot was taken in the standing position for all patients, before and six months after surgery. Comparisons were made on changes in the hindfoot angles measured before and after surgery.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 84 patients with mean age of 62.28 ± 7.77 years, 77 (92%) and seven patients (eight percent) had knee varus and valgus deformity, respectively. In the knee varus group, the mean preoperative hindfoot angle was + 5.32 ± 6.12 ° (valgus) which was changed to - 0.25 ± 4.91 ° (varus) in the postoperative phase. In the knee valgus group, the mean pre and postoperative hindfoot angles were - 7.71 ± 7.06° (varus) and - 2.14 ± 5.92 ° (varus), respectively. The mean preoperative hindfoot angle in severe and very severe varus knee groups were + 5.45 ± 3.30 and + 5.28 ± 6.86 °, respectively. These angles were changed to + 0.21± 5.17 and -1.60 ± 3.89° six months after surgery, respectively. The mean preoperative hindfoot angle in severe and very severe valgus knee deformity groups were - 7.00 ± 4.69 and -8.66 ± 10.69 °, respectively. These angles were changed to - 2.00 ± 5.71 and - 2.33 ± 7.50 °after surgery, respectively. There was no significant difference between patients with severe and very severe deformity in terms of pre and post-operative hindfoot angle.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The hindfoot alignment is significantly corrected after knee arthroplasty. The severity of knee deformity does not correlate with the severity of the hindfoot deformity before and after surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32766401
doi: 10.22038/abjs.2019.33735.1883
pmc: PMC7358230
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
413-419Références
Knee. 2007 Aug;14(4):284-8
pubmed: 17561401
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Mar;88(3):526-35
pubmed: 16510818
J Athl Train. 2010 Jul-Aug;45(4):392-403
pubmed: 20617915
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985 Aug;67(4):551-6
pubmed: 4030849
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Oct;89(10):2143-9
pubmed: 17908889
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Feb;91 Suppl 1:85-9
pubmed: 19182031
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jun 21;18(1):272
pubmed: 28637433
Knee. 2017 Jan;24(1):107-115
pubmed: 27856127
Knee. 2007 Dec;14(6):452-7
pubmed: 17825567
Foot Ankle Int. 2008 Apr;29(4):400-6
pubmed: 18442455
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87 Suppl 2:59-62
pubmed: 16326724
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005 Nov-Dec;95(6):531-41
pubmed: 16291844
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2013 Mar;25(1):13-8
pubmed: 23508134
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Apr;469(4):1154-60
pubmed: 21120711
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):166-74
pubmed: 25024033
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Nov;(428):26-34
pubmed: 15534515
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Apr;56(4):1204-11
pubmed: 17393449
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;113(1):126-32
pubmed: 24189074
Mod Rheumatol. 2015 Sep;25(5):689-93
pubmed: 25608046
Foot Ankle Clin. 2003 Sep;8(3):419-30
pubmed: 14560896
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1980 Aug;62(3):346-9
pubmed: 7410467
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Feb;73(2):237-47
pubmed: 1993719
J Arthroplasty. 2004 Feb;19(2):211-6
pubmed: 14973865
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Feb;91 Suppl 1:95-101
pubmed: 19182033
Foot Ankle Clin. 2007 Jun;12(2):251-71, vi
pubmed: 17561199
Skeletal Radiol. 2010 Nov;39(11):1103-8
pubmed: 20062985
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Dec;36(12):942-53
pubmed: 17193872
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jan;30(1):126-9
pubmed: 25155238