Comparison of visualization tools for single-cell RNAseq data.


Journal

NAR genomics and bioinformatics
ISSN: 2631-9268
Titre abrégé: NAR Genom Bioinform
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101756213

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 16 03 2020
revised: 17 06 2020
accepted: 07 07 2020
entrez: 9 8 2020
pubmed: 9 8 2020
medline: 9 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In the last decade, single cell RNAseq (scRNAseq) datasets have grown in size from a single cell to millions of cells. Due to its high dimensionality, it is not always feasible to visualize scRNAseq data and share it in a scientific report or an article publication format. Recently, many interactive analysis and visualization tools have been developed to address this issue and facilitate knowledge transfer in the scientific community. In this study, we review several of the currently available scRNAseq visualization tools and benchmark the subset that allows to visualize the data on the web and share it with others. We consider the memory and time required to prepare datasets for sharing as the number of cells increases, and additionally review the user experience and features available in the web interface. To address the problem of format compatibility we have also developed a user-friendly R package,

Identifiants

pubmed: 32766548
doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqaa052
pii: lqaa052
pmc: PMC7391988
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

lqaa052

Subventions

Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics.

Références

Bioinformatics. 2020 Apr 1;36(7):2311-2313
pubmed: 31764967
Bioinformatics. 2017 Oct 1;33(19):3123-3125
pubmed: 28541377
Bioinformatics. 2018 Apr 1;34(7):1246-1248
pubmed: 29228172
Nat Methods. 2017 May;14(5):483-486
pubmed: 28346451
Genome Biol. 2018 Feb 6;19(1):15
pubmed: 29409532
Nat Methods. 2018 May;15(5):359-362
pubmed: 29608555
Nat Methods. 2018 Dec;15(12):1053-1058
pubmed: 30504886
Nat Biotechnol. 2012 Aug;30(8):777-82
pubmed: 22820318
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Jun;36(5):411-420
pubmed: 29608179
Nat Methods. 2017 Apr;14(4):381-387
pubmed: 28263961
F1000Res. 2018 Jun 14;7:741
pubmed: 30002819
Cell. 2018 Aug 9;174(4):982-998.e20
pubmed: 29909982
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Jan 8;48(D1):D77-D83
pubmed: 31665515
Science. 2014 Jan 10;343(6167):193-6
pubmed: 24408435
Cell. 2015 May 21;161(5):1187-1201
pubmed: 26000487
Nat Protoc. 2014 Jan;9(1):171-81
pubmed: 24385147
Genome Med. 2017 Dec 05;9(1):108
pubmed: 29202807
Nature. 2018 Aug;560(7719):494-498
pubmed: 30089906
BMC Genomics. 2019 Aug 27;20(1):676
pubmed: 31455220
Cell. 2015 May 21;161(5):1202-1214
pubmed: 26000488
Cell Syst. 2019 Jun 26;8(6):483-493.e7
pubmed: 31176620
Nature. 2019 Feb;566(7745):496-502
pubmed: 30787437
Cell. 2019 Jun 13;177(7):1888-1902.e21
pubmed: 31178118

Auteurs

Batuhan Cakir (B)

Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK.

Martin Prete (M)

Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK.

Ni Huang (N)

Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK.

Stijn van Dongen (S)

Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK.

Pinar Pir (P)

Gebze Technical University, Department of Bioengineering, Gebze, Kocaeli, 41400, Turkey.

Vladimir Yu Kiselev (VY)

Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK.

Classifications MeSH