R-CHOP-14 versus R-CHOP-14/CHASER for upfront autologous transplantation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: JCOG0908 study.
Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
Combined Modality Therapy
Cyclophosphamide
/ administration & dosage
Doxorubicin
/ administration & dosage
Female
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
/ methods
Humans
Induction Chemotherapy
/ methods
Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse
/ therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Prednisone
/ administration & dosage
Progression-Free Survival
Rituximab
/ administration & dosage
Transplantation, Autologous
/ adverse effects
Vincristine
/ administration & dosage
Young Adult
JCOG-LSG
autologous stem-cell transplantation
diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
high-dose chemotherapy
induction chemotherapy
Journal
Cancer science
ISSN: 1349-7006
Titre abrégé: Cancer Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101168776
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
16
05
2020
revised:
26
07
2020
accepted:
28
07
2020
pubmed:
9
8
2020
medline:
16
12
2020
entrez:
9
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The efficiency of upfront consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy/autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDCT/ASCT) for newly diagnosed high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) may be influenced by induction chemotherapy. To select better induction chemotherapy regimens for HDCT/ASCT, a randomized phase II study was conducted in high-risk DLBCL patients having an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 or 3. As induction chemotherapy, 6 cycles of R-CHOP-14 (arm A) or 3 cycles of R-CHOP-14 followed by 3 cycles of CHASER (arm B) were planned, and patients who responded proceeded to HDCT with LEED and ASCT. The primary endpoint was 2-y progression-free survival (PFS), and the main secondary endpoints included overall survival, overall response rate, and adverse events (AEs). In total, 71 patients were enrolled. With a median follow-up of 40.3 mo, 2-y PFS in arms A and B were 68.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.5%-81.2%) and 66.7% (95% CI: 48.8%-79.5%), respectively. Overall survival at 2 y in arms A and B was 74.3% (95% CI: 56.4%-85.7%) and 83.3% (95% CI: 66.6%-92.1%). Overall response rates were 82.9% in arm A and 69.4% in arm B. During induction chemotherapy, 45.7% and 75.0% of patients in arms A and B, respectively, had grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicities. One patient in arm A and 6 in arm B discontinued induction chemotherapy due to AEs. In conclusion, R-CHOP-14 showed higher 2-y PFS and less toxicity compared with R-CHOP-14/CHASER in patients with high-risk DLBCL, suggesting the former to be a more promising induction regimen for further investigations (UMIN-CTR, UMIN000003823).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32767806
doi: 10.1111/cas.14604
pmc: PMC7540987
doi:
Substances chimiques
R-CHOP protocol
0
Rituximab
4F4X42SYQ6
Vincristine
5J49Q6B70F
Doxorubicin
80168379AG
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
Prednisone
VB0R961HZT
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3770-3779Subventions
Organisme : National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund
ID : 23-A-16
Organisme : National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund
ID : 23-A-17
Organisme : National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund
ID : 26-A-4
Organisme : National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund
ID : 29-A-3
Organisme : Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Grants-in-Aid for Cancer Research
ID : 16-6
Organisme : Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Grants-in-Aid for Cancer Research
ID : 20S-1
Organisme : Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Grants-in-Aid for Cancer Research
ID : 20S-6
Organisme : Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Grants-in-Aid for Cancer Research
ID : 23-A-16
Organisme : Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Grants-in-Aid for Cancer Research
ID : 23-A-17
Organisme : Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants for Clinical Cancer Research
ID : 19-27
Organisme : Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants for Clinical Cancer Research
ID : 22-29
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.
Références
Ann Oncol. 2010 Nov;21(11):2255-2261
pubmed: 20444844
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 1;23(22):5027-33
pubmed: 15955905
Haematologica. 2009 Sep;94(9):1250-8
pubmed: 19586937
J Clin Oncol. 2002 May 15;20(10):2472-9
pubmed: 12011124
Cancer Treat Rep. 1985 Dec;69(12):1375-81
pubmed: 4075313
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Dec;13(12):1250-9
pubmed: 23168367
Int J Hematol. 2003 Jun;77(5):503-11
pubmed: 12841390
Ann Oncol. 2002 Sep;13(9):1347-55
pubmed: 12196359
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):1076-1088
pubmed: 28668386
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 20;34(33):4015-4022
pubmed: 28199143
Cancer Sci. 2018 Sep;109(9):2830-2840
pubmed: 29957865
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):989-991
pubmed: 28759369
Haematologica. 2011 Aug;96(8):1136-43
pubmed: 21546499
Cancer Sci. 2008 Jan;99(1):179-84
pubmed: 17991293
Ann Oncol. 2011 Jun;22(6):1382-1391
pubmed: 21196441
Blood. 2007 Mar 1;109(5):1857-61
pubmed: 17105812
N Engl J Med. 1995 Apr 20;332(16):1045-51
pubmed: 7898521
Leukemia. 2007 Aug;21(8):1802-11
pubmed: 17554382
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 10;25(5):579-86
pubmed: 17242396
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010 May;16(5):672-7
pubmed: 20045738
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 31;369(18):1681-90
pubmed: 24171516
N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec 7;333(23):1540-5
pubmed: 7477169
Cancer Sci. 2020 Oct;111(10):3770-3779
pubmed: 32767806
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD004024
pubmed: 18254036
N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14):987-94
pubmed: 8141877
J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 10;28(14):2373-80
pubmed: 20385988