Evaluation of current post-concussion protocols.
Concussion
Electroencephalogram neurofeedback
Mild traumatic brain injury
Osteopathic medicine and physical therapy
Post-concussive syndrome
Vitamin C
Journal
Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie
ISSN: 1950-6007
Titre abrégé: Biomed Pharmacother
Pays: France
ID NLM: 8213295
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
25
03
2020
revised:
10
06
2020
accepted:
14
06
2020
pubmed:
10
8
2020
medline:
2
3
2021
entrez:
10
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The growing number of concussions and mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI) with the lack of evidence-based treatment options is a continuous health concern. This creates problems when evaluating and providing efficacious symptom management to patients suffering from post-concussion syndrome (PCS). Numerous pharmacological and non-pharmacological agents have been utilized in an attempt to treat PCS. Some of these approaches include physical therapy, analgesics, antidepressants, and nutraceuticals. Although these treatments have had some success, there has been inconsistent outcomes, with some examples of patients' symptoms worsening. Among pharmaceutical agents, fluoxetine has been a popular choice for the symptom management of PCS. Although some patients have had symptom resolution with the use of fluoxetine, there is still a lack of conclusive data. Of the several biochemical changes that occur in a patient's brain following a concussion, an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) is of particular concern. In order to counteract the responses of the brain, antioxidants, such as ascorbic acid, have been utilized to reverse the damaging cellular effects. However, this may inadvertently cause an increase in ROS, rather than a reduction. Although there is a lack of consistency in exactly when each treatment was used in the post-injury interval, it is important that we analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the most commonly used agents due to the lack of a set protocol. The studies were chosen in a non-exhaustive manner and were not consistent in patients' post-injury intervals, in addition to other baseline characteristics. However, over-arching claims that some treatments may benefit more than others can be made. This review evaluates both the pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical protocols that are most commonly utilized in post-concussive patients for their efficacy in treatment of post-concussive syndrome (PCS).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32768934
pii: S0753-3322(20)30599-0
doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110406
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
110406Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.