Evaluation of current post-concussion protocols.

Concussion Electroencephalogram neurofeedback Mild traumatic brain injury Osteopathic medicine and physical therapy Post-concussive syndrome Vitamin C

Journal

Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie
ISSN: 1950-6007
Titre abrégé: Biomed Pharmacother
Pays: France
ID NLM: 8213295

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 25 03 2020
revised: 10 06 2020
accepted: 14 06 2020
pubmed: 10 8 2020
medline: 2 3 2021
entrez: 10 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The growing number of concussions and mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI) with the lack of evidence-based treatment options is a continuous health concern. This creates problems when evaluating and providing efficacious symptom management to patients suffering from post-concussion syndrome (PCS). Numerous pharmacological and non-pharmacological agents have been utilized in an attempt to treat PCS. Some of these approaches include physical therapy, analgesics, antidepressants, and nutraceuticals. Although these treatments have had some success, there has been inconsistent outcomes, with some examples of patients' symptoms worsening. Among pharmaceutical agents, fluoxetine has been a popular choice for the symptom management of PCS. Although some patients have had symptom resolution with the use of fluoxetine, there is still a lack of conclusive data. Of the several biochemical changes that occur in a patient's brain following a concussion, an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) is of particular concern. In order to counteract the responses of the brain, antioxidants, such as ascorbic acid, have been utilized to reverse the damaging cellular effects. However, this may inadvertently cause an increase in ROS, rather than a reduction. Although there is a lack of consistency in exactly when each treatment was used in the post-injury interval, it is important that we analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the most commonly used agents due to the lack of a set protocol. The studies were chosen in a non-exhaustive manner and were not consistent in patients' post-injury intervals, in addition to other baseline characteristics. However, over-arching claims that some treatments may benefit more than others can be made. This review evaluates both the pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical protocols that are most commonly utilized in post-concussive patients for their efficacy in treatment of post-concussive syndrome (PCS).

Identifiants

pubmed: 32768934
pii: S0753-3322(20)30599-0
doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110406
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

110406

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Kristin Kim (K)

Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences University, Boston, MA, United States.

Ronny Priefer (R)

Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences University, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: ronny.priefer@mcphs.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH