Applications of ultrasound to enhance fluidized bed drying of Ascophyllum Nodosum: Drying kinetics and product quality assessment.
Airborne acoustics
Drying kinetics
Fluidized bed drying
Pre-treatment
Seaweeds
Ultrasound
Journal
Ultrasonics sonochemistry
ISSN: 1873-2828
Titre abrégé: Ultrason Sonochem
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9433356
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
19
05
2020
revised:
13
07
2020
accepted:
27
07
2020
pubmed:
10
8
2020
medline:
2
6
2021
entrez:
10
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In this study, ultrasound either as a pretreatment technique or as an integrated technique was employed to enhance fluidized bed drying of Ascophyllum nodosum, and drying kinetics and dried product quality were assessed. In order to compare technology efficiency and dried product qualities, oven drying and fluidized bed drying (FBD) were employed. The novel drying methods included airborne ultrasound-assisted fluidized bed drying (AUA), ultrasound pre-treatment followed by FBD (USP), and hot water blanching pre-treatment followed byFBD (HWB). Six drying kinetics models were used to describe the drying curves, among which the Page model was the best in fitting USP and AUA. Model by Millidi et al. was employed to describe HWB. Airborne ultrasound in AUA did not reduce energy consumption or drying time, but retained total phenolic content (TPC) as well as colour, and exhibited the highest yield among the novel drying methods. USP and HWB showed lower energy consumption and drying time considerably, but the TPC was the lowest among the studied methods. At the same time, USP dried product exhibited the lowest a
Identifiants
pubmed: 32769045
pii: S1350-4177(20)30958-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105298
pmc: PMC7786526
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Water
059QF0KO0R
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105298Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Food Res Int. 2016 Nov;89(Pt 1):701-708
pubmed: 28460968
J Sci Food Agric. 2010 Feb;90(3):445-9
pubmed: 20355066
Ultrason Sonochem. 2020 Oct;67:105162
pubmed: 32413684
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2007 Nov;85(11):1116-23
pubmed: 18066114
Ultrason Sonochem. 2018 Nov;48:249-258
pubmed: 30080548
J Sci Food Agric. 2018 Mar;98(5):1660-1673
pubmed: 28906555
Ultrason Sonochem. 2017 Jan;34:531-539
pubmed: 27773279
Ultrason Sonochem. 2019 May;53:25-43
pubmed: 30594523
Mar Drugs. 2019 Aug 08;17(8):
pubmed: 31398953
Bioresour Technol. 2008 May;99(8):2717-23
pubmed: 17706415
Ultrason Sonochem. 2017 Nov;39:47-57
pubmed: 28732971
Ultrason Sonochem. 2019 Sep;56:372-377
pubmed: 31101275
Bioresour Technol. 2015 Nov;196:301-13
pubmed: 26253914
ISME J. 2010 Feb;4(2):301-11
pubmed: 19829319
Nat Protoc. 2007;2(4):875-7
pubmed: 17446889
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2018;58(16):2842-2853
pubmed: 29851500
Ultrason Sonochem. 2014 May;21(3):1235-43
pubmed: 24411471
Food Res Int. 2018 Nov;113:288-297
pubmed: 30195523
Ultrason Sonochem. 2014 Nov;21(6):2144-50
pubmed: 24618527
Biotechnol Adv. 2011 Sep-Oct;29(5):483-501
pubmed: 21672617
Mar Drugs. 2018 Jul 28;16(8):
pubmed: 30060542
J Ethnopharmacol. 2012 Aug 1;142(3):591-619
pubmed: 22683660
Chemosphere. 2017 Nov;186:17-23
pubmed: 28759813
Food Chem. 2015 Dec 1;188:271-8
pubmed: 26041192
Ultrason Sonochem. 2015 Mar;23:302-7
pubmed: 25454823