Higher Intensity Thromboprophylaxis Regimens and Pulmonary Embolism in Critically Ill Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients.
Adult
Anticoagulants
/ therapeutic use
Betacoronavirus
COVID-19
Coronavirus Infections
/ complications
Critical Illness
/ therapy
Female
Humans
Intensive Care Units
Male
Middle Aged
Pandemics
Pneumonia, Viral
/ complications
Pulmonary Embolism
/ etiology
Retrospective Studies
SARS-CoV-2
Treatment Outcome
Venous Thrombosis
/ etiology
Journal
Critical care medicine
ISSN: 1530-0293
Titre abrégé: Crit Care Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0355501
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
10
8
2020
medline:
23
10
2020
entrez:
10
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the role of thromboprophylaxis regimens on the occurrence of pulmonary embolism in coronavirus disease 2019 patients. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on coronavirus disease 2019 patients, included between March 10, and April 30, 2020. ICU of an University Hospital in Belgium. Critically ill adult mechanically ventilated coronavirus disease 2019 patients were eligible if they underwent a CT pulmonary angiography, as part of the routine management in case of persistent hypoxemia or respiratory deterioration. The primary endpoint of this study was the occurrence of pulmonary embolism according to the use of standard thromboprophylaxis (i.e. subcutaneous enoxaparin 4,000 international units once daily) or high regimen thromboprophylaxis (i.e. subcutaneous enoxaparin 4,000 international units bid or therapeutic unfractioned heparin). Of 49 mechanically ventilated coronavirus disease 2019, 40 underwent CT pulmonary angiography after a median of 7 days (4-8 d) since ICU admission and 12 days (9-16 d) days since the onset of symptoms. Thirteen patients (33%) were diagnosed of pulmonary embolism, which was bilateral in six patients and localized in the right lung in seven patients. D-dimers on the day of CT pulmonary angiography had a predictive accuracy of 0.90 (95% CIs: 0.78-1.00) for pulmonary embolism. The use of high-regimen thromboprophylaxis was associated with a lower occurrence of pulmonary embolism (2/18; 11%) than standard regimen (11/22, 50%-odds ratio 0.13 [0.02-0.69]; p = 0.02); this difference remained significant even after adjustment for confounders. Six patients with pulmonary embolism (46%) and 14 patients without pulmonary embolism (52%) died at ICU discharge (odds ratio 0.79 [0.24-3.26]; p = 0.99). In this study, one third of coronavirus disease 2019 mechanically ventilated patients have a pulmonary embolism visible on CT pulmonary angiography. High regimen thromboprophylaxis may decrease the occurrence of such complication.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32769623
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004548
pmc: PMC7437413
pii: 00003246-202011000-00036
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticoagulants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1087-e1090Références
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 May 15;201(10):1299-1300
pubmed: 32228035
JAMA. 2020 Apr 28;323(16):1574-1581
pubmed: 32250385
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jun;18(6):1421-1424
pubmed: 32271988
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Apr;18(4):844-847
pubmed: 32073213
Crit Care Med. 2015 Feb;43(2):401-10
pubmed: 25474533
Radiology. 2020 Sep;296(3):E186-E188
pubmed: 32324103
Chest. 2015 Nov;148(5):1224-1230
pubmed: 26111103
Radiology. 2020 Sep;296(3):E189-E191
pubmed: 32324102
Thromb Res. 2020 Jul;191:145-147
pubmed: 32291094
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 May;18(5):1094-1099
pubmed: 32220112
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jul 1;180(7):934-943
pubmed: 32167524
Circulation. 2020 Jul 14;142(2):184-186
pubmed: 32330083