Burnout in emergency medicine physicians: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Journal
Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Aug 2020
07 Aug 2020
Historique:
entrez:
10
8
2020
pubmed:
10
8
2020
medline:
22
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Physician burnout has been a global problem that affects severely the mental status among doctors, especially in emergency medicine (EM). However, few studies have focused on emergency medicine physicians, and the published data are inconsistent. Thus, this meta-analysis is performed to systematically evaluate the prevalence of burnout among emergency medicine physicians. We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library from inception to September, 2019 for English-language articles. We selected all the original articles those used Maslach Burnout Inventory to assess the prevalence of burnout and its 3 dimensions emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization, and personal accomplishment (PA) in emergency medicine physicians. After literature screening, quality evaluation was performed for eligible studies by using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data; then, Begg test and Egger test was used to assess publication bias. Pooled prevalence rates were assessed by conducting a meta-analysis using random effects models. Then sensitivity analysis followed to test the stability of the result and detected the source of heterogeneity. A total of 1943 EM physicians provided burnout data. The pooled prevalence rates of high levels of emotional exhaustion, high levels of depersonalization and low levels of PA were 40% (95% CI: 26%-55%; I = 97.4%), 41% (95% CI: 30%-52%; I = 94.5%) and 35% (95% CI: 19%-52%; I = 99.0%), respectively. The mean burnout scores were 23.95 (SD = 11.88) for emotional exhaustion, 11.63 (SD = 6.85) for depersonalization, and 34.69 (SD = 7.71) for PA. This meta-analysis demonstrate a high level of burnout prevalent in EM physicians that approximately 40% experience high levels of EE and depersonalization. Our findings also suggest that EM physicians are more susceptible to burnout compared with physicians in other departments and other medical staffs in EM. More attention should be payed to mental status of EM physicians and further investigation concerning how to reduce burnout would be beneficial for EM physicians.Registration: INPLASY202060060 in inplasy.com (doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2020.6.0060).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Physician burnout has been a global problem that affects severely the mental status among doctors, especially in emergency medicine (EM). However, few studies have focused on emergency medicine physicians, and the published data are inconsistent. Thus, this meta-analysis is performed to systematically evaluate the prevalence of burnout among emergency medicine physicians.
METHODS
METHODS
We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library from inception to September, 2019 for English-language articles. We selected all the original articles those used Maslach Burnout Inventory to assess the prevalence of burnout and its 3 dimensions emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization, and personal accomplishment (PA) in emergency medicine physicians. After literature screening, quality evaluation was performed for eligible studies by using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data; then, Begg test and Egger test was used to assess publication bias. Pooled prevalence rates were assessed by conducting a meta-analysis using random effects models. Then sensitivity analysis followed to test the stability of the result and detected the source of heterogeneity.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 1943 EM physicians provided burnout data. The pooled prevalence rates of high levels of emotional exhaustion, high levels of depersonalization and low levels of PA were 40% (95% CI: 26%-55%; I = 97.4%), 41% (95% CI: 30%-52%; I = 94.5%) and 35% (95% CI: 19%-52%; I = 99.0%), respectively. The mean burnout scores were 23.95 (SD = 11.88) for emotional exhaustion, 11.63 (SD = 6.85) for depersonalization, and 34.69 (SD = 7.71) for PA.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis demonstrate a high level of burnout prevalent in EM physicians that approximately 40% experience high levels of EE and depersonalization. Our findings also suggest that EM physicians are more susceptible to burnout compared with physicians in other departments and other medical staffs in EM. More attention should be payed to mental status of EM physicians and further investigation concerning how to reduce burnout would be beneficial for EM physicians.Registration: INPLASY202060060 in inplasy.com (doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2020.6.0060).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32769876
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021462
pii: 00005792-202008070-00017
pmc: PMC7593073
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e21462Références
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2015 May;21(3):175-81
pubmed: 26033649
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Jan 21;2019:6462472
pubmed: 30800675
West Indian Med J. 2014 Jun;63(3):262-6
pubmed: 25314285
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):e1-34
pubmed: 19631507
Crit Care Nurse. 2017 Oct;37(5):e1-e9
pubmed: 28966203
J Emerg Med. 1994 Jul-Aug;12(4):559-65
pubmed: 7963406
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(10):e2856
pubmed: 26962780
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Oct 8;172(18):1377-85
pubmed: 22911330
Eur J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;22(4):227-34
pubmed: 25093897
Intern Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;13(3):421-428
pubmed: 28677043
J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 1;246:132-147
pubmed: 30580199
Afr J Emerg Med. 2018 Sep;8(3):95-99
pubmed: 30456156
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1317-1331
pubmed: 30193239
Iran J Public Health. 2013 Sep;42(9):1034-42
pubmed: 26060665
Australas Emerg Care. 2019 Sep;22(3):193-199
pubmed: 31101586
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2008 Dec 05;3:32
pubmed: 19061497
BMC Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 20;18(1):24
pubmed: 30126358
Am J Med. 2020 Feb;133(2):160-164
pubmed: 31520624
Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Dec 5;128(23):3251-3
pubmed: 26612304
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;21(9):1031-5
pubmed: 25269584
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;16(7):996-1001
pubmed: 26759643
World Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;15(2):103-11
pubmed: 27265691
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 15;17(1):407
pubmed: 28619081
Work. 2019;63(1):57-67
pubmed: 31127745
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 May;28(3):e13094
pubmed: 31090179
Emerg Med Australas. 2013 Dec;25(6):491-5
pubmed: 24118838
AEM Educ Train. 2018 Mar 26;2(2):86-90
pubmed: 30051074
Emerg Med Australas. 2018 Aug;30(4):517-522
pubmed: 29436766
ScientificWorldJournal. 2019 Feb 18;2019:4515972
pubmed: 30906233
Lancet. 2019 Jul 13;394(10193):93
pubmed: 31305255
Psychol Health. 2001 Sep;16(5):565-82
pubmed: 22804499