Reliability of relation between greater trochanter and center of rotation of femoral head in Indian population.
Centre of rotation
Femoral head
Greater trochanter
Hip arthroplasty
Hip reconstruction
Journal
Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
ISSN: 0976-5662
Titre abrégé: J Clin Orthop Trauma
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101559469
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
30
03
2020
revised:
14
04
2020
accepted:
15
04
2020
entrez:
11
8
2020
pubmed:
11
8
2020
medline:
11
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Accurate limb length restoration forms an important aspect of reconstructive surgeries around the hip joint. Among the various intraoperative methods for accurate limb length restoration, the relation between the greater trochanter and the center of the femoral head has been conventionally used owing to its simplicity and replicability. The current study aims to study the normal relation between the greater trochanter and the center of rotation of the femoral head, its population-based variation and its gender-based and contralateral differences in the Indian population. Standard anteroposterior radiographs of normal hip joints with the proximal femur, performed over a one year period were studied. A software-based analysis was conducted to measure the difference between the levels of the greater trochanteric tip and the center of the femoral head along the longitudinal axis of the femur. The measurements among the male and female cases and the contralateral sides were compared. The greater trochanteric tip lies at a higher level than the center of rotation of the femoral head by a mean difference of 9.20 ± 5.30 mm. No significant differences were observed among male and female groups and between the contralateral hip joints. Intraobserver and Interobserver reliability were high. The tip of the greater trochanter and the center of the femoral head do not lie at the same level. This differential relation should be considered during the reconstructive surgeries around the hip joint to prevent an inadvertent limb length discrepancy. Considering the wide interindividual variations, this difference cannot be generalized for all the patients and restoring it to the contralateral normal hip would be more appropriate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32774022
doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.04.017
pii: S0976-5662(20)30131-4
pmc: PMC7394784
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
S522-S525Informations de copyright
© 2020 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None of the authors have any conflicts to declare.
Références
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013 Dec;6(4):336-41
pubmed: 23900834
Clin Anat. 2010 Apr;23(3):312-8
pubmed: 20069639
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Feb;102(1 Suppl):S9-20
pubmed: 26797005
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep;21(6):897-8
pubmed: 16950046
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Sep;86(7):966-9
pubmed: 15446519
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jun;469(6):1677-82
pubmed: 20878559
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 Jul-Aug;10(4):674-679
pubmed: 31316238
Orthopedics. 1997 Apr;20(4):331-2
pubmed: 9127867
J Arthroplasty. 2001 Sep;16(6):715-20
pubmed: 11547369
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Nov;(344):188-206
pubmed: 9372771
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985 Apr;(194):207-10
pubmed: 3978918
Acta Orthop Belg. 2011 Aug;77(4):488-93
pubmed: 21954757
Acta Orthop Belg. 2009 Aug;75(4):472-6
pubmed: 19774813
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Oct;95 Suppl 10:S32-6
pubmed: 23451435
Clin Orthop Surg. 2014 Jun;6(2):153-8
pubmed: 24900895