Napabucasin overcomes cisplatin resistance in ovarian germ cell tumor-derived cell line by inhibiting cancer stemness.
Aldehyde dehydrogenase
Cancer stem cells
Cisplatin
Yolk sac tumor
Journal
Cancer cell international
ISSN: 1475-2867
Titre abrégé: Cancer Cell Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101139795
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
05
05
2020
accepted:
25
07
2020
entrez:
11
8
2020
pubmed:
11
8
2020
medline:
11
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cisplatin resistance of ovarian yolk sac tumors (oYST) is a clinical challenge due to dismal patient prognosis, even though the disease is extremely rare. We investigated potential association between cisplatin resistance and cancer stem cell (CSC) markers in chemoresistant oYST cells and targeting strategies to overcome resistance in oYST. Chemoresistant cells were derived from chemosensitive human oYST cells by cultivation in cisplatin in vitro. Derivative cells were characterized by chemoresistance, functional assays, flow cytometry, gene expression and protein arrays focused on CSC markers. RNAseq, methylation and microRNA profiling were performed. Quail chorioallantoic membranes (CAM) with implanted oYST cells were used to analyze the micro-tumor extent and interconnection with the CAM. Tumorigenicity in vivo was determined on immunodeficient mouse model. Chemoresistant cells were treated by inhibitors intefering with the CSC properties to examine the chemosensitization to cisplatin. Long-term cisplatin exposure resulted in seven-fold higher IC The novel chemoresistant cells represent unique model of refractory oYST. CSC markers are associated with cisplatin resistance being possible targets in chemorefractory oYST.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Cisplatin resistance of ovarian yolk sac tumors (oYST) is a clinical challenge due to dismal patient prognosis, even though the disease is extremely rare. We investigated potential association between cisplatin resistance and cancer stem cell (CSC) markers in chemoresistant oYST cells and targeting strategies to overcome resistance in oYST.
METHODS
METHODS
Chemoresistant cells were derived from chemosensitive human oYST cells by cultivation in cisplatin in vitro. Derivative cells were characterized by chemoresistance, functional assays, flow cytometry, gene expression and protein arrays focused on CSC markers. RNAseq, methylation and microRNA profiling were performed. Quail chorioallantoic membranes (CAM) with implanted oYST cells were used to analyze the micro-tumor extent and interconnection with the CAM. Tumorigenicity in vivo was determined on immunodeficient mouse model. Chemoresistant cells were treated by inhibitors intefering with the CSC properties to examine the chemosensitization to cisplatin.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Long-term cisplatin exposure resulted in seven-fold higher IC
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The novel chemoresistant cells represent unique model of refractory oYST. CSC markers are associated with cisplatin resistance being possible targets in chemorefractory oYST.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32774158
doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01458-7
pii: 1458
pmc: PMC7397611
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
364Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsAll authors read and approved the final manuscript, and declare that they have no competing interest. A patent application has been filed covering the finding of using the presence of 3p amplification as a molecular marker to predict cisplatin resistance in germ cell tumors, and the possibility of alternative treatment options.
Références
Ann Oncol. 2008 Aug;19(8):1435-1441
pubmed: 18408223
Toxicol Lett. 2013 Oct 24;222(2):139-45
pubmed: 23916687
Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1983 Oct;10(2):199-204
pubmed: 6616439
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Jun;26(3):347-55
pubmed: 22301054
Cancer Sci. 2010 Oct;101(10):2179-85
pubmed: 20804503
Int J Oncol. 2013 Apr;42(4):1437-42
pubmed: 23440340
Bioinformatics. 2014 Apr 1;30(7):923-30
pubmed: 24227677
Mod Pathol. 2008 Aug;21(8):1002-10
pubmed: 18500265
Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Apr;160:145-58
pubmed: 26899500
J Urol. 1977 Jan;117(1):65-9
pubmed: 63574
Br J Cancer. 2019 Feb;120(4):444-452
pubmed: 30739914
BMC Cancer. 2012 Mar 19;12:91
pubmed: 22429801
Endocr Rev. 2013 Jun;34(3):339-76
pubmed: 23575763
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;71(2):104-11
pubmed: 21150160
J Pathol. 2010 Aug;221(4):433-42
pubmed: 20593487
Cell. 2010 Apr 2;141(1):69-80
pubmed: 20371346
Microvasc Res. 2000 Mar;59(2):221-32
pubmed: 10684728
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 Nov;21(8):1414-21
pubmed: 21795985
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2008 Jun;27(2):315-34
pubmed: 18246412
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Nov;24(9 Suppl 3):S48-54
pubmed: 25341580
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20
pubmed: 24695404
J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:950658
pubmed: 23251084
Toxins (Basel). 2016 May 28;8(6):
pubmed: 27240402
Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Oct;33(10):1529-39
pubmed: 19574883
BMC Cancer. 2016 Nov 17;16(1):896
pubmed: 27855654
Nat Med. 2017 Oct 6;23(10):1124-1134
pubmed: 28985214
Oncology. 2008;74(1-2):104-11
pubmed: 18547965
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Sep;142(3):452-7
pubmed: 27401840
Radiother Oncol. 2013 Sep;108(3):378-87
pubmed: 23830195
Cell Stem Cell. 2011 Feb 4;8(2):136-47
pubmed: 21295271
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Feb 26;11(3):
pubmed: 30813586
J Gene Med. 2008 Oct;10(10):1071-82
pubmed: 18671316
Br J Cancer. 2011 Aug 9;105(4):575-85
pubmed: 21712824
BMC Cancer. 2014 Apr 30;14:304
pubmed: 24884875
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2005;6:331-54
pubmed: 16124865
Biomed Pharmacother. 2011 Oct;65(7):509-15
pubmed: 21996439
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug;12(8):445-64
pubmed: 25850553
Oncol Rep. 2015 Nov;34(5):2469-76
pubmed: 26352531
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jan;47(2):175-82
pubmed: 20851596
Ther Deliv. 2012 Feb;3(2):227-44
pubmed: 22834199
Mol Cancer Ther. 2013 Dec;12(12):2874-84
pubmed: 24130050
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Apr;12(4):701-6
pubmed: 7512129
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 10;25(20):2938-43
pubmed: 17617525
Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Apr;46(2):124-30
pubmed: 24851103
Cancer Lett. 2018 Aug 1;428:117-126
pubmed: 29653268
Cancer Res. 2007 Jul 1;67(13):6304-13
pubmed: 17616689
Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 1;29(1):15-21
pubmed: 23104886
Nat Rev Cancer. 2019 Sep;19(9):522-537
pubmed: 31413324
Blood. 2009 Jun 18;113(25):6411-8
pubmed: 19211935
Cell Biol Int. 2017 Oct;41(10):1110-1118
pubmed: 28685895
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 05;6:20502
pubmed: 26846307
Oncotarget. 2013 Oct;4(10):1698-1711
pubmed: 24091605
PLoS One. 2014 May 27;9(5):e97094
pubmed: 24865582
Nat Methods. 2014 Nov;11(11):1138-1140
pubmed: 25262207
Oncogene. 2009 Jan 15;28(2):209-18
pubmed: 18836486
Pharmacol Rev. 2006 Sep;58(3):621-81
pubmed: 16968952
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Feb;51(3):340-51
pubmed: 25559616
Cancer Lett. 2012 Sep 1;322(1):70-7
pubmed: 22343321
Adv Biol Regul. 2015 Jan;57:1-9
pubmed: 25294678
Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 15;27(6):863-4
pubmed: 21278185
BMC Cancer. 2018 Aug 24;18(1):848
pubmed: 30143021
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009 Oct;64(5):925-33
pubmed: 19263053
Bioinformatics. 2015 Jun 15;31(12):2032-4
pubmed: 25697820
J Clin Oncol. 1990 Apr;8(4):715-20
pubmed: 1690272
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 1;22(13):2691-700
pubmed: 15226336
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jun 15;18(1):656
pubmed: 29902974