Clinical Features and Outcomes of Bilateral Atypical Femoral Fractures.
Journal
Case reports in orthopedics
ISSN: 2090-6749
Titre abrégé: Case Rep Orthop
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101591806
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
13
04
2020
revised:
26
06
2020
accepted:
17
07
2020
entrez:
11
8
2020
pubmed:
11
8
2020
medline:
11
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Bilateral atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) are relatively rare. In this report, we retrospectively researched clinical features and outcomes of bilateral AFFs treated at our institution. We previously treated 4 patients (8 limbs) with intramedullary nailing for complete AFFs (6 limbs) and incomplete AFFs (2 limbs). The mean age at the first operation was 53.3 years, and all patients were female. Of the 4 patients, two had breast cancer, and another two had systemic lupus erythematosus. Three of them received bisphosphonates, and 2 received denosumab, proton pump inhibitor, or glucocorticoid therapy. Only 2 of 6 cases of incomplete AFFs had prodromal pain before progressing to complete fracture. The mean interval from the first surgery to contralateral fracture or prophylactic surgery was 16 months. Radiographically, complete bone union was achieved in 6 limbs. However, a small gap at the lateral cortex of fracture site remained in 2 limbs. Finally, all of the patients were pain-free and able to walk without a cane. It is absolutely necessary to confirm contralateral femoral conditions; however, prediction of progression to complete fracture based solely on prodromal pain was difficult. Therefore, we should advise patients about the danger of progression to complete AFFs even if they are asymptomatic, and a prophylactic surgery should be performed after obtaining informed consent.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32774964
doi: 10.1155/2020/8824756
pmc: PMC7395992
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
8824756Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Kosuke Hamahashi et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The patients and/or their families were informed that data from their cases would be submitted for publication, and they provided written informed consent.
Références
Skeletal Radiol. 2017 Feb;46(2):241-247
pubmed: 27900455
Clin Sports Med. 2006 Jan;25(1):117-28, x
pubmed: 16324978
J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Dec;27(12):2544-50
pubmed: 22836783
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2295-301
pubmed: 22669553
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jul;469(7):2028-34
pubmed: 21350886
J Bone Miner Metab. 2012 Sep;30(5):561-7
pubmed: 22610061
Skeletal Radiol. 2015 Nov;44(11):1579-84
pubmed: 26169723
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Mar;27(3):1217-1225
pubmed: 26519417
Bone. 2014 Sep;66:105-10
pubmed: 24933347
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Feb;27(2):827-32
pubmed: 26501556
J UOEH. 2016 Sep;38(3):207-14
pubmed: 27627968
J Bone Miner Metab. 2015 May;33(3):355-8
pubmed: 24996528
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jun 25;172(12):930-6
pubmed: 22732749
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2018 Aug;16(4):519-529
pubmed: 29951870
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Feb;24(2):75-81
pubmed: 20101130
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 May 23;17:227
pubmed: 27215972