Flipping the Classroom in Otolaryngology Residencies.
curricular methods
flipped classroom
graduate medical education
medical education
otolaryngology residency
otolaryngology training
program directors
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Jul 2020
03 Jul 2020
Historique:
entrez:
11
8
2020
pubmed:
11
8
2020
medline:
11
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Objective To understand the use of the flipped classroom (FC) - learning core content prior to an academic session, with class time devoted to applying this content - in otolaryngology residency education. Methods An electronic survey of 107 otolaryngology program directors (PDs), including demographic details, the flipped classroom perception instrument (FCPI), and the otolaryngology programs' current use of FC. Results Forty-four (41%) PDs completed the FCPI. Seventy-one point one (71.1%) of respondents were male, 60% were 30-49 years, and the remainder were older. Sixty-two percent (62%) had fellowships associated with their program, 21.7% of programs used the FC model Very Often, 17.4% Somewhat Often, 28.3% Sometimes, 17.4% Somewhat Rarely, 8.7% Very Rarely, and 6.5% Never. Attitudes toward FC principles were positive with modes "strongly agree" for all, except for "online modules enhance learning" where the mode was "slightly agree" with significantly higher scores for PDs over age 50 than for those younger (4.17 vs. 3.63, p=0.033). There were no other significant differences comparing male vs. female PDs, younger vs. older PDs, smaller vs. larger programs, programs with or without fellowships, programs with 100% vs. <100% board exam pass rates, or programs in different geographical regions. The pre-class activity mean score was 4.34 (95% CI 4.12-4.56) and the in-class mean score was 4.18 (95% CI 3.99-4.37). There was no significant correlation between the likelihood of using a flipped classroom and attitude scores. Conclusion PDs value both the pre-class and interactive in-class principles of FCs but only 37.8% of programs use FC often, suggesting that practical approaches to implementation in this group could improve education in this population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32775063
doi: 10.7759/cureus.8981
pmc: PMC7402438
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e8981Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020, Kohler et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Med Teach. 2015 Apr;37(4):327-30
pubmed: 24934251
Med Educ. 2018 Jun 25;:
pubmed: 29943399
Acad Med. 2017 Jan;92(1):101-107
pubmed: 27680317
J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;51(3):284-291.e1
pubmed: 27381954
Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3):471-477
pubmed: 28640030
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Apr;141(4):324-8
pubmed: 25695900
Acad Med. 2013 Oct;88(10):1407-10
pubmed: 23969367
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;15(7):938-44
pubmed: 25493157
Am J Surg. 2016 Feb;211(2):451-457.e1
pubmed: 26687962
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208
pubmed: 31078660
Clin Teach. 2020 Apr;17(2):195-199
pubmed: 31512400
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Jun;9(3):392-393
pubmed: 28638535
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Jun;82(5):6898
pubmed: 30013248
Med Educ Online. 2014 Nov 26;19:25746
pubmed: 25430640
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec 18;21(1):52-57
pubmed: 31913819
Crit Care Med. 2012 Dec;40(12):3305-6
pubmed: 23164769