Data Set For Computation Of Maxillary Arch Perimeter With Ramanujan's Equation For Ellipse In Different Skeletal Malocclusions.

ARCH perimeter Ellipse Inter-canine width Inter-molar width Orthodontics Ramanujan's equation TSALD

Journal

Data in brief
ISSN: 2352-3409
Titre abrégé: Data Brief
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101654995

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Historique:
received: 01 07 2020
revised: 16 07 2020
accepted: 20 07 2020
entrez: 11 8 2020
pubmed: 11 8 2020
medline: 11 8 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Every practicing orthodontist today is aware of the importance of considering arch form in the attainment of a functional orthodontic correction [1]. Arch perimeter or circumference prediction is an essential component when Tooth Size Arch Length Discrepancy (TSALD) is estimated. Arch perimeter is the distance from mesial contact of the permanent molar on one side to the mesial contact of the permanent molar on the other side, with the line connecting the buccal/incisor tip points in the intervening teeth. This is most evident when seeking to resolve dental crowding or arch-length discrepancy (ALD) [2]. The shape of the arch form of maxillary and mandible resembles that of the various geometric forms such as including ellipse, parabola, hyperbola, and catenary curve [3], [4], [5], [6]. Ellipse is the best form that fits the shape of the Maxillary arch [1,2]. The mathematical equation formulated by Srinivasan Ramanujan in 1914 for widely considered to be the most accurate for calculation of the circumference of an ellipse is [7]. The computation of the circumference of the ellipse by this equation requires two values- '

Identifiants

pubmed: 32775580
doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106079
pii: S2352-3409(20)30973-2
pii: 106079
pmc: PMC7403886
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

106079

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships which have, or could be perceived to have, influenced the work reported in this article.

Références

Br J Orthod. 1989 May;16(2):85-93
pubmed: 2673344
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Feb;147(2):235-41
pubmed: 25636558
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2013 Jul;3(2):97-102
pubmed: 24778988
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987 Jan;91(1):3-14
pubmed: 3541577
Am J Orthod. 1969 Aug;56(2):164-79
pubmed: 4896226
Angle Orthod. 1998 Feb;68(1):29-36
pubmed: 9503132
Br J Orthod. 1996 Feb;23(1):21-8
pubmed: 8652494

Auteurs

Gowri Sankar Singaraju (GS)

Department of Orthodontics, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India-524003.

Yamini Priyanka Js (YP)

Department of Orthodontics, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India-524003.

Prasad Mandava (P)

Department of Orthodontics, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India-524003.

Vivek Reddy Ganugapanta (VR)

Department of Orthodontics, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India-524003.

Naga Ravi Teja (NR)

Department of Orthodontics, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India-524003.

Praveen Reddy Jn (PR)

YourDOST Health Solutions, Bangalore, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, India-560095.

Classifications MeSH