Practice Patterns and Responsiveness to Simulated Common Ocular Complaints Among US Ophthalmology Centers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Journal
JAMA ophthalmology
ISSN: 2168-6173
Titre abrégé: JAMA Ophthalmol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589539
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Sep 2020
01 Sep 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
11
8
2020
medline:
4
11
2020
entrez:
11
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has drastically changed how comprehensive ophthalmology practices care for patients. To report practice patterns for common ocular complaints during the initial stage of the COVID-19 pandemic among comprehensive ophthalmology practices in the US. In this cross-sectional study, 40 private practices and 20 university centers were randomly selected from 4 regions across the US. Data were collected on April 29 and 30, 2020. Investigators placed telephone calls to each ophthalmology practice office. Responses to 3 clinical scenarios-refraction request, cataract evaluation, and symptoms of a posterior vitreous detachment-were compared regionally and between private and university centers. The primary measure was time to next appointment for each of the 3 scenarios. Secondary measures included use of telemedicine and advertisement of COVID-19 precautions. Of the 40 private practices, 2 (5%) were closed, 24 (60%) were only seeing urgent patients, and 14 (35%) remained open to all patients. Of the 20 university centers, 2 (10%) were closed, 17 (85%) were only seeing urgent patients, and 1 (5%) remained open to all patients. There were no differences for any telemedicine metric. University centers were more likely than private practices to mention preparations to limit the spread of COVID-19 (17 of 20 [85%] vs 14 of 40 [35%]; mean difference, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.26-0.65; P < .001). Private practices had a faster next available appointment for cataract evaluations than university centers, with a mean (SD) time to visit of 22.1 (27.0) days vs 75.5 (46.1) days (mean difference, 53.4; 95% CI, 23.1-83.7; P < .001). Private practices were also more likely than university centers to be available to see patients with flashes and floaters (30 of 40 [75%] vs 8 of 20 [40%]; mean difference, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.79; P = .01). In this cross-sectional study of investigator telephone calls to ophthalmology practice offices, there were uniform recommendations for the 3 routine ophthalmic complaints. Private practices had shorter times to next available appointment for cataract extraction and were more likely to evaluate posterior vitreous detachment symptoms. As there has not been a study examining these practice patterns before the COVID-19 pandemic, the relevance of these findings on public health is yet to be determined.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32777008
pii: 2769193
doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.3237
pmc: PMC7407319
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
981-988Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Surv Ophthalmol. 1996 Mar-Apr;40(5):405-6
pubmed: 8779088
Ophthalmology. 2014 Apr;121(4):809-11
pubmed: 24694522
Eye (Lond). 2006 Sep;20(9):1105-6
pubmed: 16273085
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 22;2018:2909024
pubmed: 29765779
Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2005;(296):71-81
pubmed: 16050422
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Jul;55(1):54-8
pubmed: 16781292
J Dermatolog Treat. 2020 Aug;31(5):436-438
pubmed: 32237998
Ophthalmology. 2018 Oct;125(10):1597-1607
pubmed: 29716787
Eur Respir J. 2020 May 7;55(5):
pubmed: 32269088
Telemed J E Health. 2015 Apr;21(4):271-3
pubmed: 25635290
J Infect. 2020 Apr;80(4):373-377
pubmed: 32109444
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jul 20;727:138394
pubmed: 32334207
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;208:206-210
pubmed: 30905726
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 May/Jun;34(3):222-224
pubmed: 28472010
JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Jul 24;:
pubmed: 31339521
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Dec;57(6):985-9
pubmed: 17720277
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2013 May;31(2):399-411
pubmed: 23601479