Short-term Psychological Outcomes of Disclosing Amyloid Imaging Results to Research Participants Who Do Not Have Cognitive Impairment.


Journal

JAMA neurology
ISSN: 2168-6157
Titre abrégé: JAMA Neurol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589536

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 12 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 11 8 2020
medline: 25 6 2021
entrez: 11 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The goal of preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD) clinical trials is to move diagnosis and treatment to presymptomatic stages, which will require biomarker testing and disclosure. To assess the short-term psychological outcomes of disclosing amyloid positron emission tomography results to older adults who did not have cognitive impairment. This observational study included participants who were screening for a multisite randomized clinical trial that began on February 28, 2014, and is anticipated to be completed in 2022. Participants aged 65 to 85 years who had no known cognitive impairments underwent an amyloid positron emission tomography scan and learned their result from an investigator who used a protocol-specified process that included prescan education and psychological assessments. This report compares participants with elevated amyloid levels with at least 1 available outcome measure with participants who did not have elevated amyloid levels who enrolled in an observational cohort study and received further evaluations. Data were collected from April 2014 to December 2017 and analyzed from March 2019 to October 2019. A personal biomarker result described as either an elevated or not elevated amyloid level. To assess the immediate and short-term psychological outcome of disclosure, the following validated measures were used: the Geriatric Depression Scale, the state items from the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, as well as the Concerns About AD Scale and the Future Time Perspective Scale to assess changes in participants' perceived risk for AD and perceived remaining life span, respectively. A total of 1167 participants with elevated amyloid levels and 538 participants with not elevated amyloid levels were included. Participants had a mean (SD) age of 71.5 (4.7) years, 1025 (60.1%) were women, and most were white (1611 [94.5%]) and non-Latino (1638 [96.1%]). Compared with participants who learned that they had a not elevated amyloid result, individuals who learned of an elevated amyloid result were no more likely to experience short-term increases in depression (mean [SD] change in the Geriatric Depression Scale score, 0.02 [1.3] vs 0.04 [1.3]; P = .90), anxiety (mean [SD] change in State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score, -0.02 [3.2] vs -0.15 [3.0]; P = .65), or suicidality (mean [SD] change in the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale score, 0.0 [0.4] vs -0.01 [0.5]; P = .67). Participants with elevated amyloid levels had increased Concern About AD scores (raw change in scores: elevated amyloid group, 0.8 [3.9]; not elevated amyloid group, -0.4 [3.8]; P < .001). Participants with not elevated amyloid levels experienced a slight increase in Future Time Perspective score(mean [SD] score, 1.15 [7.4] points; P < .001); there was no change in time perspective among those receiving an elevated amyloid result (mean [SD] score, 0.33 [7.8] points). In this observational preclinical AD study, participants who learned they had elevated amyloid levels did not experience short-term negative psychological sequelae compared with persons who learned they did not have elevated amyloid levels.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32777010
pii: 2769022
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2734
pmc: PMC7418046
doi:

Substances chimiques

Amyloid 0
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
Biomarkers 0
solanezumab 5D6PWO0333

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Observational Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1504-1513

Subventions

Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG010124
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG063689
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K24 AG035007
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P50 AG016573
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001414
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG066519
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : U19 AG010483
Pays : United States

Auteurs

Joshua D Grill (JD)

Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, Irvine.
Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine.
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine.
Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine.

Rema Raman (R)

Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, University of Southern California, San Diego, San Diego.

Karin Ernstrom (K)

Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, University of Southern California, San Diego, San Diego.

David L Sultzer (DL)

Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, Irvine.
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine.

Jeffrey M Burns (JM)

University of Kansas Alzheimer's Disease Center, Kansas City.

Michael C Donohue (MC)

Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, University of Southern California, San Diego, San Diego.

Keith A Johnson (KA)

Division of Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

Paul S Aisen (PS)

Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, University of Southern California, San Diego, San Diego.

Reisa A Sperling (RA)

Harvard Medical School, Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Jason Karlawish (J)

Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH