Functionality and starch digestibility of wrinkled and round pea flours of two different particle sizes.
Functional properties
Particle size
Round pea flour
Starch digestibility
Wrinkled pea flour
Journal
Food chemistry
ISSN: 1873-7072
Titre abrégé: Food Chem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7702639
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Jan 2021
30 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
24
02
2020
revised:
28
07
2020
accepted:
28
07
2020
pubmed:
11
8
2020
medline:
11
11
2020
entrez:
11
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Wrinkled and round peas (two varieties each type) cultivated in two locations were milled to obtain fine and coarse wrinkled (WPF) and round pea flour (RPF). WPF exhibited markedly increased pasting viscosities at 120 and 140 °C compared with 95 °C. Overall, the pasting properties of WPF were considerably lower than those of RPF. Resistant starch (RS) contents of cooked WPF (17.2-22.2%, dsb) were significantly larger than those of RPF (7.9-11.4%), resulting from higher starch gelatinization temperatures, greater amylose contents, and presence of more protein and fiber in WPF. The two particle sizes affected the water-holding capacity (WHC) of WPF, gelatinization enthalpy changes (ΔH) of WPF and RPF, and pasting properties and starch digestibility of RPF. Pearson correlation and principal component analysis (PCA) were conducted to reveal the relationships among the techno-functional parameters of pea flours. Wrinkled pea showed promise to generate new pea flours with distinct functionality and enhanced nutritional value.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32777656
pii: S0308-8146(20)31573-9
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127711
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dietary Fiber
0
Plant Proteins, Dietary
0
Starch
9005-25-8
Amylose
9005-82-7
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
127711Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.