Association between direct government subsidies and service scope of primary care facilities: a cross-sectional study in China.


Journal

International journal for equity in health
ISSN: 1475-9276
Titre abrégé: Int J Equity Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147692

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 08 2020
Historique:
received: 11 05 2020
accepted: 29 07 2020
entrez: 12 8 2020
pubmed: 12 8 2020
medline: 13 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Comprehensive primary care practices, through preconception, preventive, curative, and rehabilitative care, have been a global priority in the promotion of health. However, the scope of primary care services has still been in decline in China. Studies on the factors for primary care service scope have centred on human resources and infrastructure; the role of direct government subsidies (DGS) on services scope of primary care facilities were left unanswered. This study aimed to explore the association between the DGS and services scope of primary care facilities in China. A multi-stage, clustered cross-sectional survey using self-administrated questionnaire was conducted among primary care facilities of 36 districts/counties in China. A total of 770 primary care facilities were surveyed with 757 (98.3%) valid respondents. Of the 757 primary care facilities, 469 (62.0%) provided us detailed information of financial revenue and DGS from 2009 to 2016. Therefore, 469 primary care facilities from 31 counties/districts were included in this study. Sasabuchi-Lind-Mehlum tests and multivariate regression models were used to examine the inverted U-shaped relationship between the DGS and service scope. Of 469 PCFs, 332 (70.8%) were township health centres. Proportion of annul DGS to FR arose from 26.5% in 2009 to 50.5% in 2016. At the low proportion of DGS to financial revenue, an increase in DGS was associated with an increased service scope of primary care facilities, whereas the proportion of DGS to financial revenue over 42.5% might cause narrowed service scope (P = 0.023, 95% CI 11.59-51.74%); for the basic medical care dimension, the cut point is 42.6%. However, association between DGS and service scope of public health by primary care facilities is statistically insignificant. While the DGS successfully achieved equalization of basic preventive and public health services, the disproportionate proportion of DGS to financial revenue is associated with narrowed service scope, which might cause underutilization of primary care and distorted incentive structure of primary care. Future improvements of DGS should focus on the incentive of broader basic medical services provision, such as clarifying service scope of primary care facilities and strategic procurement with a performance-based subsidies system to determine resource allocation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Comprehensive primary care practices, through preconception, preventive, curative, and rehabilitative care, have been a global priority in the promotion of health. However, the scope of primary care services has still been in decline in China. Studies on the factors for primary care service scope have centred on human resources and infrastructure; the role of direct government subsidies (DGS) on services scope of primary care facilities were left unanswered. This study aimed to explore the association between the DGS and services scope of primary care facilities in China.
METHODS
A multi-stage, clustered cross-sectional survey using self-administrated questionnaire was conducted among primary care facilities of 36 districts/counties in China. A total of 770 primary care facilities were surveyed with 757 (98.3%) valid respondents. Of the 757 primary care facilities, 469 (62.0%) provided us detailed information of financial revenue and DGS from 2009 to 2016. Therefore, 469 primary care facilities from 31 counties/districts were included in this study. Sasabuchi-Lind-Mehlum tests and multivariate regression models were used to examine the inverted U-shaped relationship between the DGS and service scope.
RESULTS
Of 469 PCFs, 332 (70.8%) were township health centres. Proportion of annul DGS to FR arose from 26.5% in 2009 to 50.5% in 2016. At the low proportion of DGS to financial revenue, an increase in DGS was associated with an increased service scope of primary care facilities, whereas the proportion of DGS to financial revenue over 42.5% might cause narrowed service scope (P = 0.023, 95% CI 11.59-51.74%); for the basic medical care dimension, the cut point is 42.6%. However, association between DGS and service scope of public health by primary care facilities is statistically insignificant.
CONCLUSION
While the DGS successfully achieved equalization of basic preventive and public health services, the disproportionate proportion of DGS to financial revenue is associated with narrowed service scope, which might cause underutilization of primary care and distorted incentive structure of primary care. Future improvements of DGS should focus on the incentive of broader basic medical services provision, such as clarifying service scope of primary care facilities and strategic procurement with a performance-based subsidies system to determine resource allocation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32778111
doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01248-7
pii: 10.1186/s12939-020-01248-7
pmc: PMC7418383
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

135

Références

BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e028619
pubmed: 31753867
Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502
pubmed: 16202000
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Mar 9;18(1):66
pubmed: 29523121
JAMA. 2015 Dec 8;314(22):2364-72
pubmed: 26647258
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;29(2):240-7
pubmed: 26957381
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Nov;32(11):1971-6
pubmed: 24191088
JAMA. 2018 Mar 27;319(12):1239-1247
pubmed: 29522161
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Sep 1;36(9):1663-1671
pubmed: 28874496
J Am Board Fam Med. 2008 Sep-Oct;21(5):427-40
pubmed: 18772297
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2020-2026
pubmed: 29285762
Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr;54(2):356-366
pubmed: 30613955
Lancet. 2019 Sep 28;394(10204):1192-1204
pubmed: 31571602
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jun;29(6):947-55
pubmed: 24567201
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Sep;34(9):1531-7
pubmed: 26355055
Int J Integr Care. 2019 Jul 08;19(3):1
pubmed: 31327957
Global Health. 2019 Jul 2;15(1):45
pubmed: 31266514
BMJ. 2019 Jun 21;365:l2406
pubmed: 31227522
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 22;17(3):
pubmed: 31979154
Int J Equity Health. 2018 May 2;17(1):55
pubmed: 29720175
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug;30 Suppl 3:S568-75
pubmed: 26105670
Lancet. 2010 Mar 27;375(9720):1120-30
pubmed: 20346818
Ann Fam Med. 2015 May-Jun;13(3):206-13
pubmed: 25964397
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Sep 8;17(1):636
pubmed: 28886736
Ann Fam Med. 2018 Nov;16(6):492-497
pubmed: 30420363
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1546-1553
pubmed: 31161568
Lancet. 2012 Mar 3;379(9818):833-42
pubmed: 22386036
Can Fam Physician. 2018 Jun;64(6):e274-e282
pubmed: 29898948
J Rural Health. 2017 Jun;33(3):239-249
pubmed: 27500663
Med Care. 2013 Feb;51(2):186-92
pubmed: 23047128
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Oct;20(10):953-7
pubmed: 16191145
BMJ. 2017 Feb 1;356:j84
pubmed: 28148478
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
Med Care Res Rev. 2019 Oct;76(5):597-626
pubmed: 28906171
PLoS Med. 2016 Sep 06;13(9):e1002113
pubmed: 27598248
Int J Equity Health. 2017 May 23;16(1):49
pubmed: 28532500
BMJ Open. 2019 May 9;9(5):e025254
pubmed: 31072851
Lancet. 2017 Dec 9;390(10112):2584-2594
pubmed: 29231837
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 22;14(10):
pubmed: 28937609
BMJ. 2019 Jun 19;365:l2349
pubmed: 31217222
Lancet. 2011 Jun 18;377(9783):2064-6
pubmed: 21453962

Auteurs

Zhong Li (Z)

School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Research Center for Rural Health Services, Key Research Institute of Humanities & Social Sciences of Hubei Provincial Department of Education, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, 29205, SC, USA.

Peiyin Hung (P)

Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, 29205, SC, USA.

Ruibo He (R)

School of Finance and Public Administration, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan, 430205, Hubei, China.

Liang Zhang (L)

School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China. zhanglianghust@126.com.
Research Center for Rural Health Services, Key Research Institute of Humanities & Social Sciences of Hubei Provincial Department of Education, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China. zhanglianghust@126.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH