Recruitment and retention of mothers of preschoolers and school-aged children in a social media-delivered healthy eating intervention: lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial.
Blogs
Healthy eating
Mothers
Randomized controlled trial
Recruitment
Retention
Social media
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Aug 2020
10 Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
12
11
2019
accepted:
26
07
2020
entrez:
12
8
2020
pubmed:
12
8
2020
medline:
28
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Social media represent cost-effective platforms to advance the dissemination and uptake of health research to improve population health. However, there is limited evidence available to support researchers overcome methodological challenges related to recruitment and retention of participants in studies using social media for delivering behavior change interventions. This study aims to describe the recruitment and the retention strategies used in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that evaluated a blog-delivered healthy eating intervention among mothers of preschoolers and school-aged children. Eighty-four adult mothers of children aged between two and 12 years old living in Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, were recruited between October 2015 and February 2017 using traditional methods (e.g. institutional email lists, flyers, newspapers, and word of mouth) and Facebook advertisements. Retention rates were calculated at the end of the 6-month intervention and at a 12-month follow-up assessment. Sociodemographic characteristics, Internet use behaviors and retention rates of mothers recruited through traditional methods and Facebook were compared using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests and Fisher exact tests. Of the 196 mothers who responded to the recruitment call, 87 (44.4%) were eligible and 84 (42.9%) were randomized to the trial, representing a recruitment success of 76.4% (84/110) from the planned sample size target. Among those, a minority (3.6%) were recruited using Facebook. Those mothers presented similar sociodemographic characteristics to those recruited using traditional methods. Retention rates were 73.8% and 66.7% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, with similar rates between mothers recruited using Facebook and traditional methods. Various challenges associated with population retention were highlighted with lack of time being mothers' main reason for withdrawing from the study. The methodological challenges experienced during the conduct of the blog-delivered healthy eating intervention allowed to draw upon several lessons regarding the recruitment process and the retention of mothers of preschoolers and school-aged children to inform future social media-delivered research. Recommendations for future research include exploring mothers' perceptions and preferences to tailor social media recruitment, ensure that interventions are delivered to them using social media platforms that are already integrated into their routine, and are providing remote outcome assessments to increase participant retention. Clinical Trial Protocol NCT03156803 . Registered on 17 May 2017, retrospectively registered.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Social media represent cost-effective platforms to advance the dissemination and uptake of health research to improve population health. However, there is limited evidence available to support researchers overcome methodological challenges related to recruitment and retention of participants in studies using social media for delivering behavior change interventions. This study aims to describe the recruitment and the retention strategies used in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that evaluated a blog-delivered healthy eating intervention among mothers of preschoolers and school-aged children.
METHODS
METHODS
Eighty-four adult mothers of children aged between two and 12 years old living in Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, were recruited between October 2015 and February 2017 using traditional methods (e.g. institutional email lists, flyers, newspapers, and word of mouth) and Facebook advertisements. Retention rates were calculated at the end of the 6-month intervention and at a 12-month follow-up assessment. Sociodemographic characteristics, Internet use behaviors and retention rates of mothers recruited through traditional methods and Facebook were compared using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests and Fisher exact tests.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of the 196 mothers who responded to the recruitment call, 87 (44.4%) were eligible and 84 (42.9%) were randomized to the trial, representing a recruitment success of 76.4% (84/110) from the planned sample size target. Among those, a minority (3.6%) were recruited using Facebook. Those mothers presented similar sociodemographic characteristics to those recruited using traditional methods. Retention rates were 73.8% and 66.7% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, with similar rates between mothers recruited using Facebook and traditional methods. Various challenges associated with population retention were highlighted with lack of time being mothers' main reason for withdrawing from the study.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The methodological challenges experienced during the conduct of the blog-delivered healthy eating intervention allowed to draw upon several lessons regarding the recruitment process and the retention of mothers of preschoolers and school-aged children to inform future social media-delivered research. Recommendations for future research include exploring mothers' perceptions and preferences to tailor social media recruitment, ensure that interventions are delivered to them using social media platforms that are already integrated into their routine, and are providing remote outcome assessments to increase participant retention.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Clinical Trial Protocol NCT03156803 . Registered on 17 May 2017, retrospectively registered.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32778159
doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04628-0
pii: 10.1186/s13063-020-04628-0
pmc: PMC7418391
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03156803']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
706Subventions
Organisme : Danone Institute of Canada
ID : 107217
Références
JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Jun 05;4(2):e66
pubmed: 26048581
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Jan;50(1):70-74.e1
pubmed: 29325665
Matern Child Nutr. 2017 Apr;13(2):
pubmed: 27040460
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Aug;14(8):1364-81
pubmed: 20633316
Health Psychol. 2016 Jan;35(1):92-5
pubmed: 26192385
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Sep 15;18(9):e248
pubmed: 27634633
J Evid Based Med. 2012 Feb;5(1):44-5
pubmed: 23528122
Nutrients. 2015 Sep 10;7(9):7633-50
pubmed: 26378570
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Jan 1;9(1):129-134
pubmed: 29474726
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 2;12(6):e0178326
pubmed: 28575048
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 22;342(25):1887-92
pubmed: 10861325
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Jul;118(7):1220-1227.e3
pubmed: 29107587
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 7;18(11):e286
pubmed: 27821383
Women Birth. 2018 Oct;31(5):350-361
pubmed: 29373261
Child Obes. 2017 Oct;13(5):356-368
pubmed: 28557558
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jan 21;15:22
pubmed: 25604090
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 28;19(8):e290
pubmed: 28851679
Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 May;71(5):1054-61
pubmed: 10799366
Internet Interv. 2014 Apr;1(2):58-64
pubmed: 25045624
Eat Behav. 2016 Jan;20:1-8
pubmed: 26554510
JMIR Form Res. 2019 Dec 10;3(4):e13854
pubmed: 31821149
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 20;7(3):e015276
pubmed: 28320800
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014 Mar-Apr;46(2):128-33
pubmed: 24220043
Obes Sci Pract. 2016 Jun;2(2):224-248
pubmed: 27499884
Matern Child Nutr. 2020 Jul;16(3):e12981
pubmed: 32141188
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Apr 18;6(4):e59
pubmed: 28420600
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 29;19(6):e232
pubmed: 28663162
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 08;17(4):e87
pubmed: 25858777
P T. 2014 Jul;39(7):491-520
pubmed: 25083128
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 06;13(1):e2
pubmed: 21212045
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Jan;120(1):53-68
pubmed: 31519466
Br J Nutr. 2015 Nov 14;114(9):1464-70
pubmed: 26353803
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017 Mar;5:26-33
pubmed: 28685168
Nutrients. 2016 Sep 13;8(9):
pubmed: 27649233
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Oct 24;6(10):e200
pubmed: 29066427
Digit Health. 2018 May 07;4:2055207618771757
pubmed: 29942634
Appetite. 1998 Oct;31(2):205-28
pubmed: 9792733
Trials. 2014 Oct 16;15:399
pubmed: 25322807
Internet Interv. 2016 Apr 27;4:72-81
pubmed: 30135792
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 16;10(3):e0118899
pubmed: 25775005
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014 Nov-Dec;46(6):610-5
pubmed: 25069621
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Nov 14;15(11):e250
pubmed: 24231040
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 01;9(10):e108842
pubmed: 25272039
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 May 19;6(5):e92
pubmed: 28526669
Health Psychol Rev. 2016 Sep;10(3):297-312
pubmed: 26262912
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Sep;92(3):426-31
pubmed: 23899831
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Oct 29;9:129
pubmed: 23107387
Trials. 2013 Jun 09;14:166
pubmed: 23758961
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 22;20(2):e20
pubmed: 29472174
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Aug 02;5(3):e159
pubmed: 27485934
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 16;18(6):e166
pubmed: 27328967
Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 Sep;74(3):387-401
pubmed: 11522565
Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 14;6:1849
pubmed: 26696920
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 20;20(2):e55
pubmed: 29463487
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 26;9(3):e92744
pubmed: 24671210
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013 May-Jun;45(3):264-8
pubmed: 23622351