Repeat ablative therapy in hereditary or multifocal renal cancer: Functional and oncological outcomes.


Journal

Urologic oncology
ISSN: 1873-2496
Titre abrégé: Urol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9805460

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2020
Historique:
received: 05 10 2019
revised: 28 06 2020
accepted: 13 07 2020
pubmed: 12 8 2020
medline: 29 6 2021
entrez: 12 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To report managing renal tumors in patients at greater risk of repeated interventions (genetic predisposition, multifocal tumors) with thermoablative treatments (AT). A known significant challenge in these patients is the balance between nephron preservation and oncologic outcome. This retrospective, single-center study was based on data from patients treated with one or more AT for hereditary or multifocal renal tumors between 2007 and 2017. All medical records were systematically reviewed, and 10 patients meeting inclusion criteria were selected. Six patients had confirmed von Hippel-Lindau disease, 1 Bird-Hogg-Dubé syndrome, 1 chromosome 3 translocation, and 2 had a presumed genetic predisposition. Median age at cancer diagnosis was 39.5 years (±8.9). Fifty-seven tumors, including 41 de novo tumors that appeared during follow-up, were treated with 32 AT sessions (cryotherapy or radiofrequency) with an average tumor size of 13.5 mm (±9) and a median RENAL score of 6 [5; 7]. One patient underwent concomitant partial nephrectomy for a 55 mm lesion which was close to the bowel. Treatment was unsuccessful in 2 cases, subsequently managed successfully by retreatment with AT. Median delay of appearance of de novo tumor after the first AT was 18 months [6 ; 24]. One patient had metastatic progression. Overall and cancer specific survival was 90% and 100%, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 7.5 years (±4.9). The mean decrease in Chronic Kidney Disease - Epidemiological Collaboration equation-estimated glomerular filtration rate at the end of follow-up was 5.5 ml/min/1.73 m This study suggests that AT allows to meet the oncological objectives whilst preserving renal function in patients with renal cancer at greater risk of repeated treatments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32778477
pii: S1078-1439(20)30343-4
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.07.020
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

797.e15-797.e20

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Victor Gaillard (V)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Of Strasbourg, 1place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg, France. Electronic address: victor.gaillard@live.fr.

Thibault Tricard (T)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Of Strasbourg, 1place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg, France.

Julien Garnon (J)

Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Of Strasbourg, 1place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg, France.

Roberto Luigi Cazzato (RL)

Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Of Strasbourg, 1place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg, France.

Danoob Dalili (D)

Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Afshin Gangi (A)

Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Of Strasbourg, 1place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg, France.

Herve Lang (H)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Of Strasbourg, 1place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH