The Value of a New Diagnostic Test for Prostate Cancer: A Cost-Utility Analysis in Early Stage of Development.
Journal
PharmacoEconomics - open
ISSN: 2509-4254
Titre abrégé: Pharmacoecon Open
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101700780
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
12
8
2020
medline:
12
8
2020
entrez:
12
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Standard biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis is an unpleasant and sometimes painful procedure with a detection rate as low as around 50%. Consequently, an accurate blood-based test would be highly desirable to improve the predictive accuracy. However, the clinical value of a new blood test for diagnosing prostate cancer depends on its sensitivity and specificity, in relation to the selected target population. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the health-economic value of introducing a new and more accurate diagnostic blood-based test to identify men in need of a biopsy to diagnose prostate cancer. We developed a Discrete Event Simulation Model with outputs including number of biopsies, cancer diagnosis, treatments and prostate cancer deaths. The analysis was performed from a health care perspective. It used epidemiologic data, treatment patterns, and health care costs from the Swedish region Skåne (population of 1.3 million). A 90% sensitivity and specificity of the new test was assumed. Among 31,250 men, age 50-69 years, 16.4% had a PSA between 3.0 and 9.9 µg/L and 28.9% a PSA of 2.0-9.9 µg/L. Testing men with PSA 3.0-9.9 µg/L, as in current clinical practice, decreased the number of biopsies by 3595, detected 61 more cancers, resulting in and two more fatalities and subsequently a loss of 14 QALYs. Cost offsets could justify a test value of SEK 4996. Testing a larger population, PSA 2.0-9.9 µg/L prevented 6 deaths, added 50 QALYs, and could justify a value of the test of SEK 5165, given a value of health of SEK 500,000 per QALY. A new blood-based test for prostate cancer has a significant potential to reduce the number of biopsies needed, resulting in reduced health care costs and improve patient care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Standard biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis is an unpleasant and sometimes painful procedure with a detection rate as low as around 50%. Consequently, an accurate blood-based test would be highly desirable to improve the predictive accuracy. However, the clinical value of a new blood test for diagnosing prostate cancer depends on its sensitivity and specificity, in relation to the selected target population.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this analysis was to investigate the health-economic value of introducing a new and more accurate diagnostic blood-based test to identify men in need of a biopsy to diagnose prostate cancer.
METHOD
METHODS
We developed a Discrete Event Simulation Model with outputs including number of biopsies, cancer diagnosis, treatments and prostate cancer deaths. The analysis was performed from a health care perspective. It used epidemiologic data, treatment patterns, and health care costs from the Swedish region Skåne (population of 1.3 million). A 90% sensitivity and specificity of the new test was assumed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among 31,250 men, age 50-69 years, 16.4% had a PSA between 3.0 and 9.9 µg/L and 28.9% a PSA of 2.0-9.9 µg/L. Testing men with PSA 3.0-9.9 µg/L, as in current clinical practice, decreased the number of biopsies by 3595, detected 61 more cancers, resulting in and two more fatalities and subsequently a loss of 14 QALYs. Cost offsets could justify a test value of SEK 4996. Testing a larger population, PSA 2.0-9.9 µg/L prevented 6 deaths, added 50 QALYs, and could justify a value of the test of SEK 5165, given a value of health of SEK 500,000 per QALY.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
A new blood-based test for prostate cancer has a significant potential to reduce the number of biopsies needed, resulting in reduced health care costs and improve patient care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32780268
doi: 10.1007/s41669-020-00226-7
pii: 10.1007/s41669-020-00226-7
pmc: PMC7895873
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
77-88Références
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec;16(16):1667-76
pubmed: 26563502
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822
pubmed: 28110982
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):203-13
pubmed: 22808955
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;36(28):2887-2894
pubmed: 30106639
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777
pubmed: 29552975
N Engl J Med. 2001 May 3;344(18):1373-7
pubmed: 11333995
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Jul;35(7):727-740
pubmed: 28432642
J Urol. 2011 Nov;186(5):1830-4
pubmed: 21944136
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Oct;19(87):i-xxxi, 1-191
pubmed: 26507078
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Nov;16(11):1340-1351
pubmed: 30442734
Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1109-15
pubmed: 25168616
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86
pubmed: 25220842
Urology. 2002 Nov;60(5):826-30
pubmed: 12429309
Biom J. 2012 Jan;54(1):127-42
pubmed: 22095849
Eur J Cancer. 2010 Nov;46(17):3102-8
pubmed: 21047593
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Fall;24(4):465-72
pubmed: 18828942
Rev Urol. 2017;19(3):149-155
pubmed: 29302237
Proteomics Clin Appl. 2014 Dec;8(11-12):951-62
pubmed: 25196118
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 16;367(7):595-605
pubmed: 22894572
Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):954-960
pubmed: 27329565
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Feb;20(2):255-61
pubmed: 21148123
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424
pubmed: 27626136
BJU Int. 2017 Jul;120(1):61-68
pubmed: 27743489