Dynamic foraminal dimensions during neck motion 6.5 years after fusion and artificial disc replacement.
Adult
Aged
Biomechanical Phenomena
Cervical Vertebrae
/ diagnostic imaging
Diskectomy
/ adverse effects
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
/ surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Period
Range of Motion, Articular
Spinal Fusion
/ adverse effects
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Total Disc Replacement
/ adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
22
04
2020
accepted:
23
07
2020
entrez:
12
8
2020
pubmed:
12
8
2020
medline:
8
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To compare changes in foraminal motion at two time points post-surgery between artificial disc replacement (ADR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Eight ACDF and 6 ADR patients (all single-level C5-6) were tested at 2 years (T1) and 6.5 years (T2) post-surgery. The minimum foraminal height (FH.Min) and width (FW.Min) achieved during neck axial rotation and extension, and the range of these dimensions during motion (FH.Rn and FW.Rn, respectively) were measured using a biplane dynamic x-ray system, CT imaging and model-based tracking while patients performed neck axial rotation and extension tasks. Two-way mixed ANOVA was employed for analysis. In neck extension, significant interactions were found between year post-surgery and type of surgery for FW.Rn at C5-6 (p<0.006) and C6-7 (p<0.005), and for FH.Rn at C6-7 (p<0.01). Post-hoc analysis indicated decreases over time in FW.Rn for ACDF (p<0.01) and increases in FH.Rn for ADR (p<0.03) at the C6-7 adjacent level. At index level, FW.Rn was comparable between ACDF and ADR at T1, but was smaller for ACDF than for ADR at T2 (p<0.002). In axial rotation, differences were found between T1 and T2 but did not depend on type of surgery (p>0.7). Changes were observed in the range of foraminal geometry at adjacent levels from 2 years to 6.5 years post-surgery that were different between ACDF and ADR for neck extension. These changes are contrary to the notion that motion at adjacent levels continue to increase following ACDF as compared to ADR over the long term.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32780779
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237350
pii: PONE-D-20-11680
pmc: PMC7418980
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0237350Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: AB reports personal fees from SeaSpine Holdings, personal fees from Depuy Synthes Spine, outside the submitted work. SWB reports personal fees from DePuy Synthes, outside the submitted work. VC reports personal fees from Globus Medical, other from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, outside the submitted work. All authors are affiliated with Henry Ford Health System. DO, TB, AB, MJB, SWB, VC and YNY are salaried employees, and SA, AS are PW unpaid research volunteers. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Mar;20(3):245-55
pubmed: 24359000
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 1;32(23):2578-84
pubmed: 17978657
Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):341-9
pubmed: 20362252
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Mar 15;36(6):E393-400
pubmed: 21372650
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jul;197(1):W134-40
pubmed: 21700974
Eur Spine J. 1999;8(5):396-401
pubmed: 10552323
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Feb;15(2):111-3
pubmed: 2326704
J Neurosurg. 2001 Jul;95(1 Suppl):40-2
pubmed: 11453429
Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):1191-1198
pubmed: 27904963
J Spine Surg. 2020 Mar;6(1):18-25
pubmed: 32309642
Spine J. 2018 Apr;18(4):575-583
pubmed: 28882520
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 15;38(14):1226-32
pubmed: 23403550
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Dec;68(9):1354-70
pubmed: 3782207
Ochsner J. 2014 Spring;14(1):78-83
pubmed: 24688337
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Feb;16(2):172-7
pubmed: 22136389
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Oct 15;37(22 Suppl):S75-84
pubmed: 22885832
Cranio. 1989 Oct;7(4):275-85
pubmed: 2640164
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Feb 15;42(4):209-216
pubmed: 28207654
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Oct 15;23(20):2180-4
pubmed: 9802158
Eur Spine J. 2015 Sep;24(9):1882-92
pubmed: 26038156
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Mar 15;34(6):E202-7
pubmed: 19282725
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Jan;18(1):120-7
pubmed: 8434312
Spine J. 2010 Jun;10(6):497-504
pubmed: 20359957
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Mar;18(3):245-54
pubmed: 23330952
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 15;27(22):2431-4
pubmed: 12435970
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(27):e4171
pubmed: 27399140
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):516-28
pubmed: 25036218
Surg Radiol Anat. 2017 Oct;39(10):1069-1078
pubmed: 28343254
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jul 1;26(13):E287-93
pubmed: 11458168
J Spinal Disord. 1997 Jun;10(3):229-33
pubmed: 9213279
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 Jun;36(5):327-32
pubmed: 23769602
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Apr;81(4):519-28
pubmed: 10225797
Neurospine. 2019 Sep;16(3):589-600
pubmed: 31607093
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Mar 15;27(6):587-95
pubmed: 11884906
Radiol Med. 2014 Mar;119(3):164-74
pubmed: 24337755
J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Nov;57:185-193
pubmed: 30197057
J Neurosurg. 2004 Jan;100(1 Suppl Spine):2-6
pubmed: 14748566
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Oct;17(10):1131-6
pubmed: 1440000
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Oct;28(8):E449-53
pubmed: 26393318
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Jul;20(5):361-8
pubmed: 17607101
Spine J. 2013 Mar;13(3):342-51
pubmed: 23420004
J Korean Med Sci. 2004 Feb;19(1):101-6
pubmed: 14966350
Spine J. 2016 Apr;16(4):540-6
pubmed: 26681352
Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Feb;31(1):E50-E54
pubmed: 28604508
Neurol Res. 2006 Jul;28(5):568-71
pubmed: 16808891