Bilateral traumatic C6-C7 facet dislocation with C6 spondyloptosis and large disk sequestration in a neurologically intact patient.
Cervical facet dislocation
cervical spine fusion
cervical spondyloptosis
traumatic cervical spondylolisthesis
treatment of cervical dislocation
Journal
SAGE open medical case reports
ISSN: 2050-313X
Titre abrégé: SAGE Open Med Case Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101638686
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
06
02
2020
accepted:
29
04
2020
entrez:
13
8
2020
pubmed:
13
8
2020
medline:
13
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Traumatic cervical spondyloptosis is an uncommon and severe form of facet joint dislocation that commonly leads to severe neurological damage. Decision making regarding the reduction and fixation technique is challenging, especially when a patient is neurologically intact, since an undiagnosed prolapsed disk at the involved level may lead to severe neurological consequences during reduction. A 24-year-old male was admitted after sustaining a severe direct axial blow to his head. Computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging scans revealed an acute C6C7 fracture dislocation with spondyloptosis of C6 vertebra and a large disk fragment posterior to C6 vertebral body. The patient was neurologically intact, apart from mild bilateral numbness over C6 distribution. The patient underwent C6 corpectomy to avoid acute cord compression related to the large sequestered disk behind C6 vertebra. Following C6 corpectomy, we were unable to exert enough axial pull to reduce the facet dislocation through the anterior approach. Therefore, the reduction was performed through a posterior approach with C5T1 posterior fusion, followed by anterior cage placement and C5-7 anterior fusion (front-back-front approach). At postoperative follow-up of 24 months, the patient demonstrated a full and pain-free cervical range-of-motion and remained neurologically intact. Follow-up radiographs of the cervical spine demonstrated good instrumental alignment with solid fusion at 6-month follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32782800
doi: 10.1177/2050313X20929189
pii: 10.1177_2050313X20929189
pmc: PMC7383727
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
2050313X20929189Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Eur Spine J. 2014 Oct;23 Suppl 6:658-63
pubmed: 25200147
J Neurosurg. 1983 May;58(5):760-2
pubmed: 6834124
World Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;82(6):1374-9
pubmed: 24530458
Ochsner J. 2014 Spring;14(1):108-11
pubmed: 24688342
Surg Neurol. 2004 Nov;62(5):431-4
pubmed: 15518852
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 1;34(19):E703-8
pubmed: 19730203
Orthopedics. 2004 Dec;27(12):1297-8
pubmed: 15633963
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Oct 15;32(22):2467-73
pubmed: 18090087
Spine J. 2010 Jul;10(7):e16-20
pubmed: 20620981
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2004 Aug;47(4):242-4
pubmed: 15346323
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Apr 1;33(7):E188-93
pubmed: 18379387