Machine learning vs. classic statistics for the prediction of IVF outcomes.
IVF
Implantation
Machine learning
Oocytes
Prediction models
Journal
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
ISSN: 1573-7330
Titre abrégé: J Assist Reprod Genet
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9206495
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
08
04
2020
accepted:
30
07
2020
pubmed:
13
8
2020
medline:
27
5
2021
entrez:
13
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess whether machine learning methods provide advantage over classic statistical modeling for the prediction of IVF outcomes. The study population consisted of 136 women undergoing a fresh IVF cycle from January 2014 to August 2016 at a tertiary, university-affiliated medical center. We tested the ability of two machine learning algorithms, support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural network (NN), vs. classic statistics (logistic regression) to predict IVF outcomes (number of oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, top-quality embryos, positive beta-hCG, clinical pregnancies, and live births) based on age and BMI, with or without clinical data. Machine learning algorithms (SVM and NN) based on age, BMI, and clinical features yielded better performances in predicting number of oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, fertilized oocytes, top-quality embryos, positive beta-hCG, clinical pregnancies, and live births, compared with logistic regression models. While accuracies were 0.69 to 0.9 and 0.45 to 0.77 for NN and SVM, respectively, they were 0.34 to 0.74 using logistic regression models. Our findings suggest that machine learning algorithms based on age, BMI, and clinical data have an advantage over logistic regression for the prediction of IVF outcomes and therefore can assist fertility specialists' counselling and their patients in adjusting the appropriate treatment strategy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32783138
doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01908-1
pii: 10.1007/s10815-020-01908-1
pmc: PMC7550518
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2405-2412Subventions
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : R21 ES024236
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : P30 ES000002
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : P30ES00002 and K99ES026648
Pays : United States
Organisme : Environment and Health Fund
ID : RPGA1301
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R21ES024236
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : P30 ES009089
Pays : United States
Références
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015 Sep;53(9):911-20
pubmed: 25894468
Fertil Steril. 2019 Feb;111(2):318-326
pubmed: 30611557
Med Decis Making. 2015 Aug;35(6):714-25
pubmed: 24842951
Cancer Invest. 2017 Nov 26;35(10):647-651
pubmed: 29243988
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Apr 4;2:21
pubmed: 31304368
Fertil Steril. 2019 Aug;112(2):387-396.e3
pubmed: 31146888
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Jul;36(7):1441-1448
pubmed: 31218565
Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Jan;26(1):42-9
pubmed: 23177416
Hum Reprod. 2020 Jan 1;35(1):100-116
pubmed: 31960915
Int J Fertil Steril. 2017 Oct;11(3):184-190
pubmed: 28868840
Lancet. 1995 Oct 21;346(8982):1075-9
pubmed: 7564791
Environ Int. 2018 Feb;111:23-31
pubmed: 29161633
Epidemiol Infect. 2018 Aug;146(11):1445-1451
pubmed: 29880081
Circulation. 2015 Nov 17;132(20):1920-30
pubmed: 26572668
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Apr;36(4):591-600
pubmed: 30690654
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 29;375(13):1216-9
pubmed: 27682033
In Vivo. 2016 Jul-Aug;30(4):507-12
pubmed: 27381616