Treatment effect of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy by prognostic and intrinsic subtype and biomarker analysis in patients with bone-only disease: a joint analysis of PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3 clinical trials.
Bone-only disease
Disease-free interval
Intrinsic subtype
Palbociclib
Treatment-free interval
Journal
Breast cancer research and treatment
ISSN: 1573-7217
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer Res Treat
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8111104
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
25
03
2020
accepted:
30
06
2020
pubmed:
13
8
2020
medline:
24
6
2021
entrez:
13
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This analysis evaluated the relationship between treatment-free interval (TFI, in PALOMA-2)/disease-free interval (DFI, in PALOMA-3) and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS, in PALOMA-3), treatment effect in patients with bone-only disease, and whether intrinsic subtype affects PFS in patients receiving palbociclib. Data were from phase 3, randomized PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3 clinical studies of hormone receptor‒positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‒negative (HR+ /HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients receiving endocrine therapy plus palbociclib or placebo. Subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot (STEPP) analysis evaluated the association between DFI and PFS and OS. PFS by luminal subtype and cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 or endocrine pathway gene expression levels were evaluated in patients with bone-only disease; median PFS and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Median durations of TFI were 37.1 and 30.9 months (PALOMA-2) and DFI were 49.2 and 52.0 months (PALOMA-3) in the palbociclib and placebo groups, respectively. Among the PALOMA-2 biomarker population (n = 454), 23% had bone-only disease; median PFS was longer with palbociclib versus placebo (31.3 vs 11.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI 0.25‒0.69). The interaction effect of bone-only versus visceral disease subgroups on median PFS with palbociclib was not significant (P = 0.262). Among the PALOMA-3 biomarker population (n = 302), 27% had bone-only disease. STEPP analyses showed that palbociclib PFS benefit was not affected by DFI, and that palbociclib OS effect may be smaller in patients with short DFIs. Among patients who provided metastatic tumor tissues (n = 142), regardless of luminal A (hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% CI 0.11‒0.47; P = 0.0000158) or luminal B (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI 0.12‒0.56; P = 0.000269) subtype, palbociclib improved PFS versus placebo. These findings support palbociclib plus endocrine therapy as standard of care for HR+ /HER2- ABC patients, regardless of baseline TFI/DFI or intrinsic molecular subtype, including patients with bone-only disease. Pfizer (clinicaltrials.gov:NCT01740427, NCT01942135).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32783178
doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05782-4
pii: 10.1007/s10549-020-05782-4
pmc: PMC7568717
doi:
Substances chimiques
Piperazines
0
Pyridines
0
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
palbociclib
G9ZF61LE7G
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01942135', 'NCT01740427']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
23-35Références
Br J Cancer. 1990 Jul;62(1):142-6
pubmed: 2390476
Int J Cancer. 2013 Jul;133(1):1-13
pubmed: 23280579
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jan 1;26(1):110-121
pubmed: 31527167
Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jun;43(2):89-95
pubmed: 21811424
Ann Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;29(3):669-680
pubmed: 29342248
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 10;37(14):1169-1178
pubmed: 30807234
Am J Cancer Res. 2015 Sep 15;5(10):2929-43
pubmed: 26693050
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Apr;174(3):719-729
pubmed: 30632023
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;35(25):2875-2884
pubmed: 28580882
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 10;35(32):3638-3646
pubmed: 28968163
Breast Cancer Res. 2009;11(5):R77
pubmed: 19874578
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1926-1936
pubmed: 30345905
Lancet. 2015 Oct 3;386(10001):1341-1352
pubmed: 26211827
Cancer Res. 2008 May 1;68(9):3108-14
pubmed: 18451135
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Dec 04;107(1):357
pubmed: 25479802
Ann Oncol. 2016 May;27(5):828-33
pubmed: 26823524
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 1;34(25):3069-103
pubmed: 27217461
In Vivo. 2018 Mar-Apr;32(2):353-358
pubmed: 29475920
Br J Cancer. 2015 Apr 28;112(9):1445-51
pubmed: 25880008
Stat Med. 2009 Apr 15;28(8):1255-68
pubmed: 19170050
Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12 Suppl 2:S2
pubmed: 21050423
Breast. 2015 Nov;24 Suppl 2:S26-35
pubmed: 26253814
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):425-439
pubmed: 26947331
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):1925-1936
pubmed: 27959613
Mol Cancer Ther. 2004 Nov;3(11):1427-38
pubmed: 15542782
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Apr;75:284-298
pubmed: 28259011
Lancet. 2017 Jun 17;389(10087):2403-2414
pubmed: 27939057
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 16;373(3):209-19
pubmed: 26030518
J Bone Oncol. 2017 Aug 31;8:18-22
pubmed: 28884071
World J Exp Med. 2018 Aug 30;8(1):1-7
pubmed: 30191138
Curr Oncol. 2018 Jun;25(Suppl 1):S131-S141
pubmed: 29910656
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Jan 15;95(2):142-53
pubmed: 12529347
Cancer Manag Res. 2015 Jan 21;7:37-46
pubmed: 25653556
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jun;169(3):469-479
pubmed: 29404806
Am J Clin Pathol. 2015 Apr;143(4):471-8
pubmed: 25779997
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Oct 1;2(10):1287-1294
pubmed: 27281556
Ann Oncol. 2012 Oct;23(10):2578-2584
pubmed: 22492698
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 20;36(24):2465-2472
pubmed: 29860922