Recruiting Adolescents With Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis to Internet-Delivered Therapy: Internal Pilot Within a Randomized Controlled Trial.
chronic fatigue syndrome
cognitive behavioral therapy
e-counseling
e-therapy
eHealth
myalgic encephalomyelitis
online systems
pediatrics
pilot projects
qualitative research
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 08 2020
12 08 2020
Historique:
received:
10
01
2020
accepted:
14
05
2020
revised:
24
04
2020
entrez:
14
8
2020
pubmed:
14
8
2020
medline:
23
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) in adolescents is common and disabling. Teenagers in the United Kingdom are more likely to recover if they access specialist care, but most do not have access to a local specialist CFS/ME service. Delivering treatment remotely via the internet could improve access to treatment. This study aims to assess (1) the feasibility of recruitment and retention into a trial of internet-delivered specialist treatment for adolescents with CFS/ME and (2) the acceptability of trial processes and 2 web-based treatments (to inform continuation to full trial). This study is an internal pilot for the initial 12 months of a full randomized controlled trial (RCT), with integrated qualitative methods (analysis of recruitment consultations and participant and clinician interviews). Recruitment and treatment were delivered remotely from a specialist pediatric CFS/ME treatment service within a hospital in South West United Kingdom. Adolescents (aged 11-17 years) from across the United Kingdom with a diagnosis of CFS/ME and no access to local specialist treatment were referred by their general practitioner to the treatment center. Eligibility assessment and recruitment were conducted via remote methods (telephone and on the web), and participants were randomized (via a computer-automated system) to 1 of 2 web-based treatments. The trial intervention was Fatigue in Teenagers on the InterNET in the National Health Service, a web-based modular CFS/ME-specific cognitive behavioral therapy program (designed to be used by young people and their parents or caregivers) supported by individualized clinical psychologist electronic consultations (regular, scheduled therapeutic message exchanges between participants and therapist within the platform). The comparator was Skype-delivered activity management with a CFS/ME clinician (mainly a physiotherapist or occupational therapist). Both treatments were intended to last for up to 6 months. The primary outcomes were (1) the number of participants recruited (per out-of-area referrals received between November 1, 2016, to October 31, 2017) and the proportion providing 6-month outcome data (web-based self-report questionnaire assessing functioning) and (2) the qualitative outcomes indicating the acceptability of trial processes and treatments. A total of 89 out of 150 (59.3% of potentially eligible referrals) young people and their parents or caregivers were recruited, with 75 out of 89 (84.2%) providing 6-month outcome data. Overall, web-based treatment was acceptable; however, participants and clinicians described both the advantages and disadvantages of remote methods. No serious adverse events were reported. Recruiting young people (and their parents or caregivers) into an RCT of web-based treatment via remote methods is feasible and acceptable. Delivering specialist treatment at home via the internet is feasible and acceptable, although some families prefer to travel across the United Kingdom for face-to-face treatment. ISRCTN 18020851; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN18020851. RR2-10.1186/s13063-018-2500-3.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) in adolescents is common and disabling. Teenagers in the United Kingdom are more likely to recover if they access specialist care, but most do not have access to a local specialist CFS/ME service. Delivering treatment remotely via the internet could improve access to treatment.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to assess (1) the feasibility of recruitment and retention into a trial of internet-delivered specialist treatment for adolescents with CFS/ME and (2) the acceptability of trial processes and 2 web-based treatments (to inform continuation to full trial).
METHODS
This study is an internal pilot for the initial 12 months of a full randomized controlled trial (RCT), with integrated qualitative methods (analysis of recruitment consultations and participant and clinician interviews). Recruitment and treatment were delivered remotely from a specialist pediatric CFS/ME treatment service within a hospital in South West United Kingdom. Adolescents (aged 11-17 years) from across the United Kingdom with a diagnosis of CFS/ME and no access to local specialist treatment were referred by their general practitioner to the treatment center. Eligibility assessment and recruitment were conducted via remote methods (telephone and on the web), and participants were randomized (via a computer-automated system) to 1 of 2 web-based treatments. The trial intervention was Fatigue in Teenagers on the InterNET in the National Health Service, a web-based modular CFS/ME-specific cognitive behavioral therapy program (designed to be used by young people and their parents or caregivers) supported by individualized clinical psychologist electronic consultations (regular, scheduled therapeutic message exchanges between participants and therapist within the platform). The comparator was Skype-delivered activity management with a CFS/ME clinician (mainly a physiotherapist or occupational therapist). Both treatments were intended to last for up to 6 months. The primary outcomes were (1) the number of participants recruited (per out-of-area referrals received between November 1, 2016, to October 31, 2017) and the proportion providing 6-month outcome data (web-based self-report questionnaire assessing functioning) and (2) the qualitative outcomes indicating the acceptability of trial processes and treatments.
RESULTS
A total of 89 out of 150 (59.3% of potentially eligible referrals) young people and their parents or caregivers were recruited, with 75 out of 89 (84.2%) providing 6-month outcome data. Overall, web-based treatment was acceptable; however, participants and clinicians described both the advantages and disadvantages of remote methods. No serious adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSIONS
Recruiting young people (and their parents or caregivers) into an RCT of web-based treatment via remote methods is feasible and acceptable. Delivering specialist treatment at home via the internet is feasible and acceptable, although some families prefer to travel across the United Kingdom for face-to-face treatment.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ISRCTN 18020851; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN18020851.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)
RR2-10.1186/s13063-018-2500-3.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32784188
pii: v22i8e17768
doi: 10.2196/17768
pmc: PMC7450376
doi:
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN18020851']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e17768Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 14/192/109
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_17210
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K025643/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
©Emma Anderson, Roxanne Parslow, William Hollingworth, Nicola Mills, Lucy Beasant, Daisy Gaunt, Chris Metcalfe, David Kessler, John Macleod, Susan Pywell, Kieren Pitts, Simon Price, Paul Stallard, Hans Knoop, Elise Van de Putte, Sanne Nijhof, Gijs Bleijenberg, Esther Crawley. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 12.08.2020.
Références
Lancet. 2012 Apr 14;379(9824):1412-8
pubmed: 22385683
BMJ Open. 2013 Jun 20;3(6):
pubmed: 23794542
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):789-798
pubmed: 28578829
J R Soc Med. 2000 Mar;93(3):129-34
pubmed: 10741312
Internet Interv. 2018 Dec 23;15:43-51
pubmed: 30619719
Pediatrics. 2012 Jul;130(1):e71-9
pubmed: 22711716
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
pubmed: 1593914
Trials. 2014 Jan 06;15:5
pubmed: 24393291
Trials. 2016 Jun 08;17(1):283
pubmed: 27278130
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;58(4):474-503
pubmed: 27943285
Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;212(2):112-118
pubmed: 29436329
Arch Dis Child. 2015 Dec;100(12):1141-7
pubmed: 26453575
Arch Dis Child. 2009 Oct;94(10):752-6
pubmed: 19001477
BMJ Open. 2011 Dec 12;1(2):e000252
pubmed: 22155938
Trials. 2018 Feb 22;19(1):136
pubmed: 29471861