Assessment of Bypass of the Nearest Primary Health Care Facility Among Women in Ghana.
Adolescent
Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Ghana
/ epidemiology
Health Facilities
/ statistics & numerical data
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Middle Aged
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
/ statistics & numerical data
Patient Preference
Primary Health Care
Quality of Health Care
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 08 2020
03 08 2020
Historique:
entrez:
14
8
2020
pubmed:
14
8
2020
medline:
1
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recent reports have highlighted that expanding access to health care is ineffective at meeting the goal of universal health coverage if the care offered does not meet a minimum level of quality. Health care facilities nearest to patient's homes that are perceived to offer inadequate or inappropriate care are frequently bypassed in favor of more distant private or tertiary-level hospital facilities that are perceived to offer higher-quality care. To estimate the frequency with which women in Ghana bypass the nearest primary health care facility and describe patient experiences, costs, and other factors associated with this choice. This nationally representative survey study was conducted in 2017 and included 4203 households to identify women in Ghana aged 15 to 49 years (ie, reproductive age) who sought primary care within the last 6 months. Women who sought care within the past 6 months were included in the study. Data were analyzed from 2018 to 2019. Bypass was defined as a woman's report that she sought care at a health facility other than the nearest facility. Sociodemographic characteristics, reasons why women sought care, reasons why women bypassed their nearest facility, ratings for responsiveness of care, patient experience, and out-of-pocket costs. All numbers and percentages were survey-weighted to account for survey design. A total of 4289 women met initial eligibility criteria, and 4207 women (98.1%) completed the interview. A total of 1993 women reported having sough health care in the past 6 months, and after excluding those who were ineligible and survey weighting, the total sample included 1946 women. Among these, 629 women (32.3%) reported bypassing their nearest facilities for primary care. Women who bypassed their nearest facilities, compared with women who did not, were more likely to visit a private facility (152 women [24.5%] vs 202 women [15.6%]) and borrow money to pay for their care (151 women [24.0%] vs 234 women [17.8%]). After adjusting for covariates, women who bypassed reported paying a mean of 107.2 (95% CI, 79.1-135.4) Ghanaian Cedis (US $18.50 [95% CI, $13.65-$23.36]) for their care, compared with a mean of 58.6 (95% CI, 28.1-89.2) Ghanaian Cedis (US $10.11 [95% CI, $4.85-15.35]) for women who did not bypass (P = .006). Women who bypassed cited clinician competence (136 women [34.3%]) and availability of supplies (93 women [23.4%]) as the most important factors in choosing a health facility. The findings of this survey study suggest that bypassing the nearest health care facility was common among women in Ghana and that available services at lower levels of primary care are not meeting the needs of a large proportion of women. Among the benefits women perceived from bypassing were clinician competence and availability of supplies. These data provide insights to policy makers regarding potential gaps in service delivery and may help to guide primary health care improvement efforts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32785634
pii: 2769231
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12552
pmc: PMC7424402
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2012552Références
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 7;14(2):e0211984
pubmed: 30730967
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 2;14(7):e0218662
pubmed: 31265454
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Aug;73(4):540-549
pubmed: 21775038
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 31;13(1):e0189364
pubmed: 29385135
Lancet. 2018 Nov 17;392(10160):2203-2212
pubmed: 30195398
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Nov;6(11):e1196-e1252
pubmed: 30196093
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(5):722-728
pubmed: 29352418
Prev Med. 2016 Nov;92:74-81
pubmed: 27667338
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Oct 1;32(8):1146-1152
pubmed: 28541422
Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Apr 1;92(4):246-53
pubmed: 24700992
Global Health. 2018 Jun 20;14(1):59
pubmed: 29925416
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Sep;38(9):1576-1584
pubmed: 31479351
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 21;16(1):597
pubmed: 27769230
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Feb 28;26:105
pubmed: 28491236
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Dec 20;3(6):e001002
pubmed: 30622745
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 10;6:30291
pubmed: 27506292
Health Econ. 2005 Jul;14(7):687-701
pubmed: 15619273
Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Mar 31;23:146
pubmed: 27279971
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Feb 13;5(2):e002149
pubmed: 32133195
J Urban Health. 2018 Feb;95(1):1-12
pubmed: 29270709
Health Policy Plan. 1999 Jun;14(2):135-51
pubmed: 10538717
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 May;32(5):566-571
pubmed: 27943038
Trop Med Int Health. 2016 Apr;21(4):504-14
pubmed: 26806479
PLoS Med. 2019 Aug 7;16(8):e1002879
pubmed: 31390364
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Nov;6(11):e1176-e1185
pubmed: 30322648
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 11;10(8):e0135621
pubmed: 26262840
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 27;9(7):e029631
pubmed: 31352421
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Feb;30(1):1-7
pubmed: 24270520
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 29;18(1):1006
pubmed: 30594198
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 Jun;17(6):775-81
pubmed: 22519746
Glob Health Action. 2016 Aug 19;9:32178
pubmed: 27545454
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 20;14(6):e0218157
pubmed: 31220114
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jun;207:80-88
pubmed: 29734058
Ann Fam Med. 2008 Mar-Apr;6(2):124-30
pubmed: 18332404
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Nov 17;11:315
pubmed: 22094076
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 2;19(1):209
pubmed: 30940134
Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1301723
pubmed: 28578615
Health Policy Plan. 2009 Jul;24(4):279-88
pubmed: 19304785
Stud Fam Plann. 2017 Sep;48(3):293-303
pubmed: 28885679