New technologies in the mix: Assessing N-mixture models for abundance estimation using automated detection data from drone surveys.

abundance estimation hierarchical models koala linear models machine learning thermal imaging unmanned aerial vehicles wildlife detection

Journal

Ecology and evolution
ISSN: 2045-7758
Titre abrégé: Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101566408

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Historique:
received: 08 12 2019
revised: 16 05 2020
accepted: 02 06 2020
entrez: 14 8 2020
pubmed: 14 8 2020
medline: 14 8 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Reliable estimates of abundance are critical in effectively managing threatened species, but the feasibility of integrating data from wildlife surveys completed using advanced technologies such as remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) and machine learning into abundance estimation methods such as N-mixture modeling is largely unknown due to the unique sources of detection errors associated with these technologies.We evaluated two modeling approaches for estimating the abundance of koalas detected automatically in RPAS imagery: (a) a generalized N-mixture model and (b) a modified Horvitz-Thompson (H-T) estimator method combining generalized linear models and generalized additive models for overall probability of detection, false detection, and duplicate detection. The final estimates from each model were compared to the true number of koalas present as determined by telemetry-assisted ground surveys.The modified H-T estimator approach performed best, with the true count of koalas captured within the 95% confidence intervals around the abundance estimates in all 4 surveys in the testing dataset (

Identifiants

pubmed: 32788970
doi: 10.1002/ece3.6522
pii: ECE36522
pmc: PMC7417234
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

8176-8185

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Références

Syst Biol. 2004 Oct;53(5):793-808
pubmed: 15545256
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 24;7:45127
pubmed: 28338047
Ecol Evol. 2019 Feb 05;9(2):899-909
pubmed: 30766679
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 17;6:22574
pubmed: 26986721
Ecology. 2018 Jul;99(7):1547-1551
pubmed: 29702727
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 1;9(1):3208
pubmed: 30824795
Ecology. 2011 Jul;92(7):1429-35
pubmed: 21870617
Ecology. 2018 Feb;99(2):281-288
pubmed: 29159859
Biometrics. 2004 Mar;60(1):108-15
pubmed: 15032780
J Environ Manage. 2018 Oct 1;223:668-675
pubmed: 29975894
PeerJ. 2015 May 14;3:e952
pubmed: 26020008
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 20;13(12):e0208726
pubmed: 30571710
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Apr;125(4):1982-94
pubmed: 19354374
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 12;11(1):e0146934
pubmed: 26756624
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 9;8(1):10357
pubmed: 29985399
Biometrics. 2018 Mar;74(1):369-377
pubmed: 28672424

Auteurs

Evangeline Corcoran (E)

School of Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences Queensland University of Technology (QUT) Brisbane QLD Australia.

Simon Denman (S)

School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Queensland University of Technology (QUT) Brisbane QLD Australia.

Grant Hamilton (G)

School of Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences Queensland University of Technology (QUT) Brisbane QLD Australia.

Classifications MeSH